I have an old laptop with Win10 that runs slow, would Linux be better?


Recommended Posts

On 27/08/2022 at 17:58, ThaCrip said:

 

Linux Mint v21.0-Xfce (which I prefer over Cinnamon, slow hardware or not) will almost certainly be better than that as that's too long and you got a respectable CPU to.

 

even my old AMD Athlon X2 3600+ CPU (dual core from basically late 2000's) with a 250GB HDD and 4GB of RAM (the RAM cannot be upgraded any further as the ASUS board is at it's limit) boots up and is usable well faster than 3-5 minutes on Mint 21.0-Xfce. I did not time it, but starting from when the OS loads I can't imagine it's more than roughly 2 minutes tops off the top of my head to get the computer in a usable state.

 

but honestly, if you use that fairly often a SSD would be worth getting since the boot up times will drop significantly (and load times of programs will drop significantly, especially when you are trying to load multiple programs at the same time). still, even a regular hard drive should not take 3-5min to finish booting and getting to a usable state.

 

even on a laptop I got with a CLEARLY underpowered CPU (and 8GB of RAM and currently has a 128GB SSD in it)... Linux Mint clearly runs better than Windows 10 does overall. sure, the CPU is still slow either way, but since it does not have many CPU cycles to spare in general, you don't have all of that background junk on Mint that Windows 10 does using up a already low amount of CPU resources which I think is ultimately why Mint runs better than Win10 on that laptop. so Mint runs smoother and becomes usable quicker when booting up. plus, it seems with updates in general they install faster on Mint than Windows which is probably a much bigger deal when you already got a well underpowered CPU.

 

granted, the OP's CPU is still plenty good enough either way with Mint or Win10. but assuming the OP is staying on Win10, a SSD is the bottom line answer to give his overall system a solid performance boost.

 

 

 

That's typical behavior on a regular HDD. because if you are only loading one thing at a time, it's not too bad, but if you try to load more than one thing at a time, and each of those things require decent hard drive activity, the system will slow to a crawl temporarily.

 

even on Mint on my old 250GB HDD etc. after boot up if I load the browser, it take a bit for the browser to initially load which is not bad and expected. but say after a fresh boot up I ran system updates to Mint and there is decent hard drive activity of installing those updates and then I try loading the browser from scratch, while the updates are using the hard drive decently, it will slow to a crawl temporarily.

 

but the obvious fix in these cases, which I am sure everyone already mentioned, is to get a SSD as that will make a significant difference in these cases.

So I ran a boot timer at it said 180 seconds. I disabled the 10 second delay before explorer loads everything, so that should lower the time slightly, and I defragged the HDD, which appears to have never been done. I am also very much aware that the HDD is on it's way to the graveyard, but I only need it to work for another 2 weeks or so until I can buy a new CPU for my desktop

On 28/08/2022 at 00:58, jnelsoninjax said:

So I ran a boot timer at it said 180 seconds. I disabled the 10 second delay before explorer loads everything, so that should lower the time slightly, and I defragged the HDD, which appears to have never been done. I am also very much aware that the HDD is on it's way to the graveyard, but I only need it to work for another 2 weeks or so until I can buy a new CPU for my desktop

Ah, so this is a backup machine for when your desktop is not working correctly? It's not a primary machine?

 

In that case I wouldn't bother touching it. It will be slow and clunky, but you only need it for a short period of time every so often.

 

If you are looking to upgrade it though, I agree with upgrading the RAM to 8GB (you should have 2 slots for 4GB each?) but the main idea should be replacing the HDD for an SSD.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
On 27/08/2022 at 18:49, Nick H. said:

If you are looking to upgrade it though, I agree with upgrading the RAM to 8GB (you should have 2 slots for 4GB each?) but the main idea should be replacing the HDD for an SSD.

ya doing that, I think it would run very respectable. Friends don't let friends use "Sh** Spinners"

I'll echo the other comments here:  an SSD is a great way to extend the life of an old laptop.  It'll run like a dream!

On 27/08/2022 at 20:38, warwagon said:

ya doing that, I think it would run very respectable. Friends don't let friends use "Sh** Spinners"

It has 8GB already

On 27/08/2022 at 20:18, jnelsoninjax said:

It has 8GB already

Perfect. Then add an SSD.. it's a no brainer. Haven't used an HDD as a boot drive for the last 10 years.

On 27/08/2022 at 21:31, warwagon said:

Perfect. Then add an SSD.. it's a no brainer. Haven't used an HDD as a boot drive for the last 10 years.

I will, for $50 to boost the speed is a no brainer as you said

I think Nick H summed it up.

 

unless a laptop's 2nd gen i5 is a lot worse than a desktops, that should be far from slow (like closer to fast than slow in the big scheme of things for general day-to-day use) as on my primary desktop I got a i5-3550 (I used to have a i3-2120 not long ago (as I upgraded in 2020) before I swapped out CPU for the i5-3550) and it's still plenty fast enough for many uses, as while I know you said your setup is only got 4GB of RAM, I suspect just adding a SSD will help off-set the lack of RAM to some degree.

 

but I see you mentioned 8GB of RAM (which I am assuming this is your primary setup(?)) as I figure as long as someone has at least 8GB of RAM it should still be easily good enough for many uses, even moderate to somewhat heavy use, especially if paired with a SSD. hell, even before I upgraded from 8GB of RAM to 16GB of RAM on my primary PC 2 years ago, 8GB of RAM was still easily good enough for general usage on my SSD setup. even when I upgraded, I can't say I notice any obvious differences in general day-to-day usage, even though there are some tasks I occasionally do that can push RAM use a bit higher to where I probably get some level of benefit with the RAM upgrade (still, I figure at the very least by the time 16GB of RAM becomes a real problem, my system will probably be quite ancient by that point).

 

so I think I can confidently say that unless a person is a fairly heavy user (with fairly major RAM hog programs), the biggest all-around boost in terms of RAM upgrade will come from 4GB to 8GB more than 8GB to 16GB etc, especially if they got a SSD.

 

hell, I am sure even my i3-2120 (dual core), if I was still using it, is still good enough for general use to this day, especially if you got sufficient RAM (say 8GB) and a SSD. but I had a theory that even 4GB of RAM might not be too bad if paired with a SSD as it might help off-set the lack of RAM. but I never got around to testing this yet (but if my main PC dies, ill know soon enough since ill be immediately putting in a SSD into my old desktop computer which has a dual core CPU from the late 2000's and is limited to only 4GB of RAM).

 

p.s. but come to think of it... has anyone around here tried what I suspect might be true above? (i.e. running a decent CPU paired with only 4GB of RAM on a decent SATA SSD in that does it largely offset the performance hit from lack of RAM or not for general day-to-day use?)

  • 1 month later...

Linux is faster indeed, although it all depends on the filling details. I have a problem when rebooting Linux, the black screen is on and does not turn on, only when the power is turned off can it be turned on again. How to deal with this problem?

On 30/09/2022 at 12:11, pololy07 said:

Linux is faster indeed, although it all depends on the filling details. I have a problem when rebooting Linux, the black screen is on and does not turn on, only when the power is turned off can it be turned on again. How to deal with this problem?

This might help.

 

https://askubuntu.com/questions/162075/my-computer-boots-to-a-black-screen-what-options-do-i-have-to-fix-it

  • Thanks 1
  • 1 year later...

You can try (all) the easy Unix-like systems.

Easy difficulty
PCLinuxOS -- https://pclosusers.com/communityiso/LXQt/community-pclinuxos64-lxqt-2023.11.iso
ROSA Fresh Desktop -- https://mirror.rosalinux.ru/rosa/rosa2021.1/iso/ROSA.FRESH.12/lxqt/ROSA.FRESH.LXQT.12.4.x86_64.uefi.iso
mageia -- https://www.mageia.org/fr/downloads/
OpenMandriva -- https://www.openmandriva.org
GhostBSD -- https://www.ghostbsd.org
Clear Linux -- https://www.clearlinux.org/downloads.html
Mint -- https://linuxmint.com/download.php
EndeavourOS -- https://endeavouros.com
ALT Linux -- http://nightly.altlinux.org/sisyphus/tested/regular-lxqt-latest-x86_64.iso
nobara -- https://nobaraproject.org

When you have more experience or more skills you will be able to use more dificult systems as well.

Intermediate difficulty
DragonFly BSD -- https://www.dragonflybsd.org/
Void Linux -- https://repo-default.voidlinux.org/live/current/void-live-x86_64-20230628-xfce.iso
Alpine Linux -- https://www.alpinelinux.org/
OpenBSD -- https://www.openbsd.org
Artix Linux -- https://artixlinux.org/download.php
Devuan -- https://devuan.org

In terms of memory management (RAM usage), Alpine Linux and DragonFly BSD tend to be 'stronger' than most operating systems, but they also have a slightly more difficult learning curve at the beginning.

  • Facepalm 1

As others said, if possible, switch from HDD to SSD and upgrade to 8GB or 16GB RAM...

If you are okay with the current amount of RAM, you will be limited to 32bit versions since 64bit versions consume more memory...

Since it's already more than a year since then, I wonder what the OP did with the machine...

On 14/12/2023 at 09:58, aioraito said:

As others said, if possible, switch from HDD to SSD and upgrade to 8GB or 16GB RAM...

If you are okay with the current amount of RAM, you will be limited to 32bit versions since 64bit versions consume more memory...

Since it's already more than a year since then, I wonder what the OP did with the machine...

As everyone has said the SSD upgrade should be done and according to the OP it was done.  Upgrading to 16GB of RAM for a machine with a 2 core (4 thread) CPU doesn't make much sense to me. You are not limited to a 32-bit OS with 8GB of RAM in anyway. What are you talking about?  16GB of RAM has only become standard on NEW non-entry level computers in like the last year.

On 14/12/2023 at 08:38, FateTrap said:

You can try (all) the easy Unix-like systems.

Easy difficulty
PCLinuxOS -- https://pclosusers.com/communityiso/LXQt/community-pclinuxos64-lxqt-2023.11.iso
ROSA Fresh Desktop -- https://mirror.rosalinux.ru/rosa/rosa2021.1/iso/ROSA.FRESH.12/lxqt/ROSA.FRESH.LXQT.12.4.x86_64.uefi.iso
mageia -- https://www.mageia.org/fr/downloads/
OpenMandriva -- https://www.openmandriva.org
GhostBSD -- https://www.ghostbsd.org
Clear Linux -- https://www.clearlinux.org/downloads.html
Mint -- https://linuxmint.com/download.php
EndeavourOS -- https://endeavouros.com
ALT Linux -- http://nightly.altlinux.org/sisyphus/tested/regular-lxqt-latest-x86_64.iso
nobara -- https://nobaraproject.org

When you have more experience or more skills you will be able to use more dificult systems as well.

Intermediate difficulty
DragonFly BSD -- https://www.dragonflybsd.org/
Void Linux -- https://repo-default.voidlinux.org/live/current/void-live-x86_64-20230628-xfce.iso
Alpine Linux -- https://www.alpinelinux.org/
OpenBSD -- https://www.openbsd.org
Artix Linux -- https://artixlinux.org/download.php
Devuan -- https://devuan.org

In terms of memory management (RAM usage), Alpine Linux and DragonFly BSD tend to be 'stronger' than most operating systems, but they also have a slightly more difficult learning curve at the beginning.

Those are easy? Man, you must have a wild imagination.

I had so many issues with EndeavourOS. Just one thing popping after another. And being on Arch, it isn't easy peasy.

Nobara? That's on a whole new level. Not for a beginner.

Edit: ANY distro can be light weight depending on what DE they use/allow, as well as all the software they install OOTB.

  • Like 1
On 14/12/2023 at 13:18, Mindovermaster said:

Those are easy? Man, you must have a wild imagination.

I had so many issues with EndeavourOS. Just one thing popping after another. And being on Arch, it isn't easy peasy.

Nobara? That's on a whole new level. Not for a beginner.

Edit: ANY distro can be light weight depending on what DE they use/allow, as well as all the software they install OOTB.

You see suggestions like this all the time on the Linux subreddits when someone posts they have never used Linux before and ask for suggestions. A lot people won't even suggest a DE that is similar to Windows (like KDE or Cinnamon) and instead go to GNOME or even just a Window Manager. I think a lot of people just recommend things they prefer and for their use cases while ignoring the person asking experience and use case. It's kinda a form of gatekeeping IMO. The best were the BSD distros mentioned when the OP wanted to use Linux.

The other guy saying the OP would be limited to a 32-bit OS with 8GB of RAM was also bizarre. Both comments were very weird especially on a post that was from over two years ago. Like why?

Edited by Good Bot, Bad Bot
On 14/12/2023 at 13:29, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

You see suggestions like this all the time on the Linux subreddits when someone posts they have never used Linux before and ask for suggestions. A lot people won't even suggest a DE that is similar to Windows (like KDE or Cinnamon) and instead go to GNOME or even just a Window Manager. I think a lot of people just recommend things they prefer and for their use cases while ignoring the person asking experience and use case. It's kinda a form of gatekeeping IMO. The best were the BSD distros mentioned when the OP wanted to use Linux.

The other guy saying the OP would be limited to a 32-bit OS with 8GB of RAM was also bizarre. Both comments were very weird especially on a post that was from over two years ago. Like why?

Cinnamon is based on GNOME, so don't wash it out.

I was not telling the OP that, see who I quoted? He probably picked those distros from DistroWatch..

And BSD is good, but not somewhere you want to start at..

Everyone has an opinion and I gave mine. If you can't accept that, leave.

 

On 14/12/2023 at 14:56, Mindovermaster said:

Cinnamon is based on GNOME, so don't wash it out.

I was not telling the OP that, see who I quoted? He probably picked those distros from DistroWatch..

And BSD is good, but not somewhere you want to start at..

Everyone has an opinion and I gave mine. If you can't accept that, leave.

 

Cinnamon is based on GNOME but unlike GNOME it is a very similar to the Windows desktop layout and workflow so it would be familiar for a new Linux user.

Ummmm I didn't say you told the OP anything. It wasn't obvious I was referring to FateTrap (and others like them on Reddit) who you quoted?

I was actually agreeing with you and even if didn't I wouldn't need to or would leave. Chill man...

On 14/12/2023 at 14:46, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

I was actually agreeing with you and even if didn't I wouldn't need to or would leave. Chill man...

Didn't sound like an agreement, but.. O well.

On 14/12/2023 at 20:18, Mindovermaster said:

Didn't sound like an agreement, but.. O well.

You made a remark about those distros not being "easy" to the person in question and I replied to you that a lot of people make poor suggestions to Linux beginners. What other agreement were you looking for? LOL

On 14/12/2023 at 19:30, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

You made a remark about those distros not being "easy" to the person in question and I replied to you that a lot of people make poor suggestions to Linux beginners. What other agreement were you looking for? LOL

:rolleyes:

On 15/12/2023 at 01:39, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

As everyone has said the SSD upgrade should be done and according to the OP it was done.  Upgrading to 16GB of RAM for a machine with a 2 core (4 thread) CPU doesn't make much sense to me. You are not limited to a 32-bit OS with 8GB of RAM in anyway. What are you talking about?  16GB of RAM has only become standard on NEW non-entry level computers in like the last year.

I may not have conveyed it the way I intended, or it was misunderstood...

What I'm trying to say is 32bit OS can only use up to 4GB RAM [as what I have seen using Windows XP 32bit on a computer with 8GB RAM] while a 64bit OS can easily eat up all the 4GB RAM which is why I also recommended to upgrade to 8GB or 16GB RAM... I also have 2core 4thread computer and it is fine running 64bit LMDE with 16GB RAM and a SSD...

  • Like 1
On 14/12/2023 at 21:24, aioraito said:

What I'm trying to say is 32bit OS can only use up to 4GB RAM [as what I have seen using Windows XP 32bit on a computer with 8GB RAM] while a 64bit OS can easily eat up all the 4GB RAM which is why I also recommended to upgrade to 8GB or 16GB RAM... I also have 2core 4thread computer and it is fine running 64bit LMDE with 16GB RAM and a SSD...

Good point..

On 14/12/2023 at 20:36, Mindovermaster said:

:rolleyes:

We can only all guess why the eyeroll... is it really that hard to just say you misunderstood what I said?

Edited by Good Bot, Bad Bot
On 14/12/2023 at 22:24, aioraito said:

I may not have conveyed it the way I intended, or it was misunderstood...

What I'm trying to say is 32bit OS can only use up to 4GB RAM [as what I have seen using Windows XP 32bit on a computer with 8GB RAM] while a 64bit OS can easily eat up all the 4GB RAM which is why I also recommended to upgrade to 8GB or 16GB RAM... I also have 2core 4thread computer and it is fine running 64bit LMDE with 16GB RAM and a SSD...

That's why it's always a good idea to read the previous comments as the OP had said he upgraded to 8GB.  I didn't say the laptop wouldn't run with 16GB of RAM but there is a diminishing returns with a CPU that old. The laptop will run great with 8GB of RAM and a SSD with Linux for a secondary system.  He would be better off putting that money toward a newer laptop.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      540
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!