I have an old laptop with Win10 that runs slow, would Linux be better?


Recommended Posts

On 27/08/2022 at 17:58, ThaCrip said:

 

Linux Mint v21.0-Xfce (which I prefer over Cinnamon, slow hardware or not) will almost certainly be better than that as that's too long and you got a respectable CPU to.

 

even my old AMD Athlon X2 3600+ CPU (dual core from basically late 2000's) with a 250GB HDD and 4GB of RAM (the RAM cannot be upgraded any further as the ASUS board is at it's limit) boots up and is usable well faster than 3-5 minutes on Mint 21.0-Xfce. I did not time it, but starting from when the OS loads I can't imagine it's more than roughly 2 minutes tops off the top of my head to get the computer in a usable state.

 

but honestly, if you use that fairly often a SSD would be worth getting since the boot up times will drop significantly (and load times of programs will drop significantly, especially when you are trying to load multiple programs at the same time). still, even a regular hard drive should not take 3-5min to finish booting and getting to a usable state.

 

even on a laptop I got with a CLEARLY underpowered CPU (and 8GB of RAM and currently has a 128GB SSD in it)... Linux Mint clearly runs better than Windows 10 does overall. sure, the CPU is still slow either way, but since it does not have many CPU cycles to spare in general, you don't have all of that background junk on Mint that Windows 10 does using up a already low amount of CPU resources which I think is ultimately why Mint runs better than Win10 on that laptop. so Mint runs smoother and becomes usable quicker when booting up. plus, it seems with updates in general they install faster on Mint than Windows which is probably a much bigger deal when you already got a well underpowered CPU.

 

granted, the OP's CPU is still plenty good enough either way with Mint or Win10. but assuming the OP is staying on Win10, a SSD is the bottom line answer to give his overall system a solid performance boost.

 

 

 

That's typical behavior on a regular HDD. because if you are only loading one thing at a time, it's not too bad, but if you try to load more than one thing at a time, and each of those things require decent hard drive activity, the system will slow to a crawl temporarily.

 

even on Mint on my old 250GB HDD etc. after boot up if I load the browser, it take a bit for the browser to initially load which is not bad and expected. but say after a fresh boot up I ran system updates to Mint and there is decent hard drive activity of installing those updates and then I try loading the browser from scratch, while the updates are using the hard drive decently, it will slow to a crawl temporarily.

 

but the obvious fix in these cases, which I am sure everyone already mentioned, is to get a SSD as that will make a significant difference in these cases.

So I ran a boot timer at it said 180 seconds. I disabled the 10 second delay before explorer loads everything, so that should lower the time slightly, and I defragged the HDD, which appears to have never been done. I am also very much aware that the HDD is on it's way to the graveyard, but I only need it to work for another 2 weeks or so until I can buy a new CPU for my desktop

On 28/08/2022 at 00:58, jnelsoninjax said:

So I ran a boot timer at it said 180 seconds. I disabled the 10 second delay before explorer loads everything, so that should lower the time slightly, and I defragged the HDD, which appears to have never been done. I am also very much aware that the HDD is on it's way to the graveyard, but I only need it to work for another 2 weeks or so until I can buy a new CPU for my desktop

Ah, so this is a backup machine for when your desktop is not working correctly? It's not a primary machine?

 

In that case I wouldn't bother touching it. It will be slow and clunky, but you only need it for a short period of time every so often.

 

If you are looking to upgrade it though, I agree with upgrading the RAM to 8GB (you should have 2 slots for 4GB each?) but the main idea should be replacing the HDD for an SSD.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
On 27/08/2022 at 18:49, Nick H. said:

If you are looking to upgrade it though, I agree with upgrading the RAM to 8GB (you should have 2 slots for 4GB each?) but the main idea should be replacing the HDD for an SSD.

ya doing that, I think it would run very respectable. Friends don't let friends use "Sh** Spinners"

I'll echo the other comments here:  an SSD is a great way to extend the life of an old laptop.  It'll run like a dream!

On 27/08/2022 at 20:38, warwagon said:

ya doing that, I think it would run very respectable. Friends don't let friends use "Sh** Spinners"

It has 8GB already

On 27/08/2022 at 20:18, jnelsoninjax said:

It has 8GB already

Perfect. Then add an SSD.. it's a no brainer. Haven't used an HDD as a boot drive for the last 10 years.

On 27/08/2022 at 21:31, warwagon said:

Perfect. Then add an SSD.. it's a no brainer. Haven't used an HDD as a boot drive for the last 10 years.

I will, for $50 to boost the speed is a no brainer as you said

I think Nick H summed it up.

 

unless a laptop's 2nd gen i5 is a lot worse than a desktops, that should be far from slow (like closer to fast than slow in the big scheme of things for general day-to-day use) as on my primary desktop I got a i5-3550 (I used to have a i3-2120 not long ago (as I upgraded in 2020) before I swapped out CPU for the i5-3550) and it's still plenty fast enough for many uses, as while I know you said your setup is only got 4GB of RAM, I suspect just adding a SSD will help off-set the lack of RAM to some degree.

 

but I see you mentioned 8GB of RAM (which I am assuming this is your primary setup(?)) as I figure as long as someone has at least 8GB of RAM it should still be easily good enough for many uses, even moderate to somewhat heavy use, especially if paired with a SSD. hell, even before I upgraded from 8GB of RAM to 16GB of RAM on my primary PC 2 years ago, 8GB of RAM was still easily good enough for general usage on my SSD setup. even when I upgraded, I can't say I notice any obvious differences in general day-to-day usage, even though there are some tasks I occasionally do that can push RAM use a bit higher to where I probably get some level of benefit with the RAM upgrade (still, I figure at the very least by the time 16GB of RAM becomes a real problem, my system will probably be quite ancient by that point).

 

so I think I can confidently say that unless a person is a fairly heavy user (with fairly major RAM hog programs), the biggest all-around boost in terms of RAM upgrade will come from 4GB to 8GB more than 8GB to 16GB etc, especially if they got a SSD.

 

hell, I am sure even my i3-2120 (dual core), if I was still using it, is still good enough for general use to this day, especially if you got sufficient RAM (say 8GB) and a SSD. but I had a theory that even 4GB of RAM might not be too bad if paired with a SSD as it might help off-set the lack of RAM. but I never got around to testing this yet (but if my main PC dies, ill know soon enough since ill be immediately putting in a SSD into my old desktop computer which has a dual core CPU from the late 2000's and is limited to only 4GB of RAM).

 

p.s. but come to think of it... has anyone around here tried what I suspect might be true above? (i.e. running a decent CPU paired with only 4GB of RAM on a decent SATA SSD in that does it largely offset the performance hit from lack of RAM or not for general day-to-day use?)

  • 1 month later...

Linux is faster indeed, although it all depends on the filling details. I have a problem when rebooting Linux, the black screen is on and does not turn on, only when the power is turned off can it be turned on again. How to deal with this problem?

On 30/09/2022 at 12:11, pololy07 said:

Linux is faster indeed, although it all depends on the filling details. I have a problem when rebooting Linux, the black screen is on and does not turn on, only when the power is turned off can it be turned on again. How to deal with this problem?

This might help.

 

https://askubuntu.com/questions/162075/my-computer-boots-to-a-black-screen-what-options-do-i-have-to-fix-it

  • Thanks 1
  • 1 year later...

You can try (all) the easy Unix-like systems.

Easy difficulty
PCLinuxOS -- https://pclosusers.com/communityiso/LXQt/community-pclinuxos64-lxqt-2023.11.iso
ROSA Fresh Desktop -- https://mirror.rosalinux.ru/rosa/rosa2021.1/iso/ROSA.FRESH.12/lxqt/ROSA.FRESH.LXQT.12.4.x86_64.uefi.iso
mageia -- https://www.mageia.org/fr/downloads/
OpenMandriva -- https://www.openmandriva.org
GhostBSD -- https://www.ghostbsd.org
Clear Linux -- https://www.clearlinux.org/downloads.html
Mint -- https://linuxmint.com/download.php
EndeavourOS -- https://endeavouros.com
ALT Linux -- http://nightly.altlinux.org/sisyphus/tested/regular-lxqt-latest-x86_64.iso
nobara -- https://nobaraproject.org

When you have more experience or more skills you will be able to use more dificult systems as well.

Intermediate difficulty
DragonFly BSD -- https://www.dragonflybsd.org/
Void Linux -- https://repo-default.voidlinux.org/live/current/void-live-x86_64-20230628-xfce.iso
Alpine Linux -- https://www.alpinelinux.org/
OpenBSD -- https://www.openbsd.org
Artix Linux -- https://artixlinux.org/download.php
Devuan -- https://devuan.org

In terms of memory management (RAM usage), Alpine Linux and DragonFly BSD tend to be 'stronger' than most operating systems, but they also have a slightly more difficult learning curve at the beginning.

  • Facepalm 1

As others said, if possible, switch from HDD to SSD and upgrade to 8GB or 16GB RAM...

If you are okay with the current amount of RAM, you will be limited to 32bit versions since 64bit versions consume more memory...

Since it's already more than a year since then, I wonder what the OP did with the machine...

On 14/12/2023 at 09:58, aioraito said:

As others said, if possible, switch from HDD to SSD and upgrade to 8GB or 16GB RAM...

If you are okay with the current amount of RAM, you will be limited to 32bit versions since 64bit versions consume more memory...

Since it's already more than a year since then, I wonder what the OP did with the machine...

As everyone has said the SSD upgrade should be done and according to the OP it was done.  Upgrading to 16GB of RAM for a machine with a 2 core (4 thread) CPU doesn't make much sense to me. You are not limited to a 32-bit OS with 8GB of RAM in anyway. What are you talking about?  16GB of RAM has only become standard on NEW non-entry level computers in like the last year.

On 14/12/2023 at 08:38, FateTrap said:

You can try (all) the easy Unix-like systems.

Easy difficulty
PCLinuxOS -- https://pclosusers.com/communityiso/LXQt/community-pclinuxos64-lxqt-2023.11.iso
ROSA Fresh Desktop -- https://mirror.rosalinux.ru/rosa/rosa2021.1/iso/ROSA.FRESH.12/lxqt/ROSA.FRESH.LXQT.12.4.x86_64.uefi.iso
mageia -- https://www.mageia.org/fr/downloads/
OpenMandriva -- https://www.openmandriva.org
GhostBSD -- https://www.ghostbsd.org
Clear Linux -- https://www.clearlinux.org/downloads.html
Mint -- https://linuxmint.com/download.php
EndeavourOS -- https://endeavouros.com
ALT Linux -- http://nightly.altlinux.org/sisyphus/tested/regular-lxqt-latest-x86_64.iso
nobara -- https://nobaraproject.org

When you have more experience or more skills you will be able to use more dificult systems as well.

Intermediate difficulty
DragonFly BSD -- https://www.dragonflybsd.org/
Void Linux -- https://repo-default.voidlinux.org/live/current/void-live-x86_64-20230628-xfce.iso
Alpine Linux -- https://www.alpinelinux.org/
OpenBSD -- https://www.openbsd.org
Artix Linux -- https://artixlinux.org/download.php
Devuan -- https://devuan.org

In terms of memory management (RAM usage), Alpine Linux and DragonFly BSD tend to be 'stronger' than most operating systems, but they also have a slightly more difficult learning curve at the beginning.

Those are easy? Man, you must have a wild imagination.

I had so many issues with EndeavourOS. Just one thing popping after another. And being on Arch, it isn't easy peasy.

Nobara? That's on a whole new level. Not for a beginner.

Edit: ANY distro can be light weight depending on what DE they use/allow, as well as all the software they install OOTB.

  • Like 1
On 14/12/2023 at 13:18, Mindovermaster said:

Those are easy? Man, you must have a wild imagination.

I had so many issues with EndeavourOS. Just one thing popping after another. And being on Arch, it isn't easy peasy.

Nobara? That's on a whole new level. Not for a beginner.

Edit: ANY distro can be light weight depending on what DE they use/allow, as well as all the software they install OOTB.

You see suggestions like this all the time on the Linux subreddits when someone posts they have never used Linux before and ask for suggestions. A lot people won't even suggest a DE that is similar to Windows (like KDE or Cinnamon) and instead go to GNOME or even just a Window Manager. I think a lot of people just recommend things they prefer and for their use cases while ignoring the person asking experience and use case. It's kinda a form of gatekeeping IMO. The best were the BSD distros mentioned when the OP wanted to use Linux.

The other guy saying the OP would be limited to a 32-bit OS with 8GB of RAM was also bizarre. Both comments were very weird especially on a post that was from over two years ago. Like why?

Edited by Good Bot, Bad Bot
On 14/12/2023 at 13:29, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

You see suggestions like this all the time on the Linux subreddits when someone posts they have never used Linux before and ask for suggestions. A lot people won't even suggest a DE that is similar to Windows (like KDE or Cinnamon) and instead go to GNOME or even just a Window Manager. I think a lot of people just recommend things they prefer and for their use cases while ignoring the person asking experience and use case. It's kinda a form of gatekeeping IMO. The best were the BSD distros mentioned when the OP wanted to use Linux.

The other guy saying the OP would be limited to a 32-bit OS with 8GB of RAM was also bizarre. Both comments were very weird especially on a post that was from over two years ago. Like why?

Cinnamon is based on GNOME, so don't wash it out.

I was not telling the OP that, see who I quoted? He probably picked those distros from DistroWatch..

And BSD is good, but not somewhere you want to start at..

Everyone has an opinion and I gave mine. If you can't accept that, leave.

 

On 14/12/2023 at 14:56, Mindovermaster said:

Cinnamon is based on GNOME, so don't wash it out.

I was not telling the OP that, see who I quoted? He probably picked those distros from DistroWatch..

And BSD is good, but not somewhere you want to start at..

Everyone has an opinion and I gave mine. If you can't accept that, leave.

 

Cinnamon is based on GNOME but unlike GNOME it is a very similar to the Windows desktop layout and workflow so it would be familiar for a new Linux user.

Ummmm I didn't say you told the OP anything. It wasn't obvious I was referring to FateTrap (and others like them on Reddit) who you quoted?

I was actually agreeing with you and even if didn't I wouldn't need to or would leave. Chill man...

On 14/12/2023 at 14:46, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

I was actually agreeing with you and even if didn't I wouldn't need to or would leave. Chill man...

Didn't sound like an agreement, but.. O well.

On 14/12/2023 at 20:18, Mindovermaster said:

Didn't sound like an agreement, but.. O well.

You made a remark about those distros not being "easy" to the person in question and I replied to you that a lot of people make poor suggestions to Linux beginners. What other agreement were you looking for? LOL

On 14/12/2023 at 19:30, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

You made a remark about those distros not being "easy" to the person in question and I replied to you that a lot of people make poor suggestions to Linux beginners. What other agreement were you looking for? LOL

:rolleyes:

On 15/12/2023 at 01:39, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

As everyone has said the SSD upgrade should be done and according to the OP it was done.  Upgrading to 16GB of RAM for a machine with a 2 core (4 thread) CPU doesn't make much sense to me. You are not limited to a 32-bit OS with 8GB of RAM in anyway. What are you talking about?  16GB of RAM has only become standard on NEW non-entry level computers in like the last year.

I may not have conveyed it the way I intended, or it was misunderstood...

What I'm trying to say is 32bit OS can only use up to 4GB RAM [as what I have seen using Windows XP 32bit on a computer with 8GB RAM] while a 64bit OS can easily eat up all the 4GB RAM which is why I also recommended to upgrade to 8GB or 16GB RAM... I also have 2core 4thread computer and it is fine running 64bit LMDE with 16GB RAM and a SSD...

  • Like 1
On 14/12/2023 at 21:24, aioraito said:

What I'm trying to say is 32bit OS can only use up to 4GB RAM [as what I have seen using Windows XP 32bit on a computer with 8GB RAM] while a 64bit OS can easily eat up all the 4GB RAM which is why I also recommended to upgrade to 8GB or 16GB RAM... I also have 2core 4thread computer and it is fine running 64bit LMDE with 16GB RAM and a SSD...

Good point..

On 14/12/2023 at 20:36, Mindovermaster said:

:rolleyes:

We can only all guess why the eyeroll... is it really that hard to just say you misunderstood what I said?

Edited by Good Bot, Bad Bot
On 14/12/2023 at 22:24, aioraito said:

I may not have conveyed it the way I intended, or it was misunderstood...

What I'm trying to say is 32bit OS can only use up to 4GB RAM [as what I have seen using Windows XP 32bit on a computer with 8GB RAM] while a 64bit OS can easily eat up all the 4GB RAM which is why I also recommended to upgrade to 8GB or 16GB RAM... I also have 2core 4thread computer and it is fine running 64bit LMDE with 16GB RAM and a SSD...

That's why it's always a good idea to read the previous comments as the OP had said he upgraded to 8GB.  I didn't say the laptop wouldn't run with 16GB of RAM but there is a diminishing returns with a CPU that old. The laptop will run great with 8GB of RAM and a SSD with Linux for a secondary system.  He would be better off putting that money toward a newer laptop.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!