Ideal setup for a consultant with different clients on a Windows (11) machine


Recommended Posts

Just a question... when working as a consultant on 1 laptop with multiple clients and client-environments, custom/client logins, applications etc... what is the best setup?

Given that's everything secured via agreements and righteous use of software per client, GDPR etc.

 

- each client a different Windows user on your (local) machine, with the apps installed that are needed per client?

- use different VM's?

- use virtual desktops?

- use specific software for client-management? (if so  which?)

- something else?

It really depends on the agreements you have with your clients. One other option you can consider (if complete data separation is required) is multiple Windows installs, and you boot into the specific client install as required.

 

The main issue with this, as well as using different client accounts is that it might get very annoying for you when you want to do things like check your mail, keep browser bookmarks in sync, have shared documents (quotes and the like) - because each install/account would require you to keep its own set of what is basically common data. But again, it's all down to what your agreements say regarding data privacy.

 

VM's are not a bad way to go if your machine can run them with good performance. This will depend on what client specific software you want to run inside the VM though.

  • 4 weeks later...
On 29/09/2022 at 00:52, BoondockSaint said:

It really depends on the agreements you have with your clients. One other option you can consider (if complete data separation is required) is multiple Windows installs, and you boot into the specific client install as required.

 

The main issue with this, as well as using different client accounts is that it might get very annoying for you when you want to do things like check your mail, keep browser bookmarks in sync, have shared documents (quotes and the like) - because each install/account would require you to keep its own set of what is basically common data. But again, it's all down to what your agreements say regarding data privacy.

 

VM's are not a bad way to go if your machine can run them with good performance. This will depend on what client specific software you want to run inside the VM though.

Is VirtualBox a decent program, or do I need more 'professional like' tooling for this. If so, which?

I don't mind paying for it, as long as it's reasonable and somewhere around a maximum €100/$100 /year (or preferably a one time down payment)

I guess the devolutions suggested by @binaryzero is a bit too expensive for me and the purpose I would like to use it for.

VirtualBox is a solid offering, especially given its pricetag of $0. It is highly configurable, whether it can do what you need really depends on the software you will install inside of it. Its primary commercial competitor would be VMware Workstation, which (in the EU at least) is around €188 (perpetual license, so you only pay for main version upgrades).

Of course the biggest consideration is what your host machine is - and how many resources you can give your VMs.

Client privacy is important, but whether you want to go to this level of data separation really depends on what sector you are working in. You need to consider software licensing if you go with the VM approach - sure you can install MS Office 365 (as an example) on multiple devices, but what about other apps you need. Are your clients providing you with individual licenses? If you're running with VMs, you need to think about backing up that data - not just the whole VM (that part is easy), but the client documents too. In that scenario, do you need to keep them on separate backup drives, or can you have them toegher?

Will this computer be used strictly for client work, or will it be for your own purposes too. You could make it simpler by having separate user accounts on the machine for each client. This would mean that your browser caches, bookmarks, mail files, documents all have their own home directory. You can still install software for each client on the machine as a whole, but configuration is kept with the user profile.

Well it'd help if you told us what sort of consulting you'll be doing...

Lol too expensive....jfc, purchase software and then make your money back...it's paid for itself. 

Edited by binaryzero

I'm into digital marketing & customer journey developments for clients. And everything I purchase needs to be "paid back" via the customer in my rates. So I would like to keep those as clean, and competitive, as possible.

Normally specific software, and licenses, are paid by the customer (and I can use them with their credentials). Some other (generic) tooling I have myself.

So therefore I would like to have, for each client of mine, single environments and/or filesharing way like OneDrive, Sharepoint or whatever (VM or something similar). Separated from other customers of mine, on 1 notebook, so I only have to log in into one client-environment and use all the software, tools that are needed for that particulier job/assignment.

 

PS Sure, I do get it that some software needs to be purchased, but I don't really get the "jfc" by @binaryzero for just asking what kind of software I best can get, and my reference on it. That's what this thread it about. Not about me not (willing to spend) money on this type of software/services.

  • Like 1
On 30/10/2022 at 11:28, kiddingguy said:

I'm into digital marketing & customer journey developments for clients. And everything I purchase needs to be "paid back" via the customer in my rates. So I would like to keep those as clean, and competitive, as possible.

Normally specific software, and licenses, are paid by the customer (and I can use them with their credentials). Some other (generic) tooling I have myself.

So therefore I would like to have, for each client of mine, single environments and/or filesharing way like OneDrive, Sharepoint or whatever (VM or something similar). Separated from other customers of mine, on 1 notebook, so I only have to log in into one client-environment and use all the software, tools that are needed for that particulier job/assignment.

 

PS Sure, I do get it that some software needs to be purchased, but I don't really get the "jfc" by @binaryzero for just asking what kind of software I best can get, and my reference on it. That's what this thread it about. Not about me not (willing to spend) money on this type of software/services.

Don’t sweat the “jfc”. Some people don’t tolerate others not thinking their way. Best to ignore them like they don’t exist. 
 

I don’t know the correct answer here but it seems to me VMs are the way to go if you want to keep them completely separate. There are low cost alternatives if you need a connection manager, like Royal TS. If you don’t need drive redirection, MS even has a  decent manager out there for free. Check out their client on the store. If aesthetics aren’t your thing, 

https://mremoteng.org

 

MS has an rdp manager for macOS.

Reminna would be useful if running Linux.

 

Are you possibly overthinking this?

Get a NAS, and setup shares.  a sperate share  per customer.  This covers your data seperation in an easy to manage manner.  

Do you really need to keep all your applications seperate?  If a client buys you an application to use, chances are it MIGHT be specific to their needs so no worry about using it for multiple clients (even then, do they care?)

 

I am in a similar boat to you, contractor with multiple similar clients, I just use the tools I need and charge the clients accordingly, keep their data in separate shares on the NAS, all backed up to an external HDD and cloud.

 

If your clients are total Nazi's on data seperation and security then the VM way might be the best way to go.  that would be a pain TBH, but each to their own in the end.

 

Good luck

On 28/09/2022 at 14:30, kiddingguy said:

Just a question... when working as a consultant on 1 laptop with multiple clients and client-environments, custom/client logins, applications etc... what is the best setup?

Given that's everything secured via agreements and righteous use of software per client, GDPR etc.

 

- each client a different Windows user on your (local) machine, with the apps installed that are needed per client?

- use different VM's?

- use virtual desktops?

- use specific software for client-management? (if so  which?)

- something else?

Windows 11 Pro, Hyper-V, encrypted workstations per client.

Don't ever ever allow client work to overlap your personal machine, except in the minor case of inprivate browsing.

I have a separate Asus machine with an AMD Ryzen 4500U, 8 GB RAM, Windows 11 Pro installed.

Thus... for each client a separate Windows user can be doable?
My personal machine is & stays my personal machine. Data from clients will never enter there.

On some policies IT-depts can - after approval by managing 'this device' - wipe the entire machine when a (data) breach has been the case (or they suspect it.

Does this mean, when I opt for another Windows-user, that my complete machine can be wiped (incl. the data from my own company, and other clients as well?
Or... will only this Windows-user be deleted from the machine?

In the first case, I think a VM would be the better option, because its "externally" managed on my computer. Also for other security reasons for my company itself as well as other clients, this might be the better other since it's more 'sandboxed' than a (more common) Windows user, right?

Typically if you're consulting, the client will provide you with the environment...

Another Windows user? Errrr okkaay.... This won't make any difference except be a pain in the ass when you need to work on multiple things.

If you're asking these questions, you probably shouldn't be offering consulting services.

  • Dislike 2
On 01/11/2022 at 06:04, binaryzero said:

Typically if you're consulting, the client will provide you with the environment...

Another Windows user? Errrr okkaay.... This won't make any difference except be a pain in the ass when you need to work on multiple things.

If you're asking these questions, you probably shouldn't be offering consulting services.

WTH 'if your asking these questions'..., please @binaryzerocome up with real & supportive answers/options to my question - as this forum is for; helping each other out!!. And not bashing on everything that has been said here. This totally makes no sense to me. And is completely not helpful.

I have been on several jobs & assignments in the past. In some cases the client will provide the environment, and sometimes even the hardware. In some cases they don't.
And maybe I am overthinking this, but I would like to do right (GPDR and security wise) for my client, and myself.

I am now on a possible assignment where I should bring in my own (company) notebook - with their tooling etc - and would like to know what options there are to have it organized and managed professionally.

On 01/11/2022 at 06:16, binaryzero said:

Just install the tools on your machine and use it, organise your data in folders. Yeah, you're overthinking it...

And that's the whole thing here in this thread... which "tools" to use :ermm:

On 31/10/2022 at 23:11, binaryzero said:

Maybe the tools that are required to do...the job? 

You're the one providing professional services for a particular skill you have, you should know which pieces of software you're going to need to use...

 

Everyone starts somewhere. Playing gatekeeper just makes you look bad. 

  • Like 2
On 01/11/2022 at 07:11, binaryzero said:

Maybe the tools that are required to do...the job? 

You're the one providing professional services for a particular skill you have, you should know which pieces of software you're going to need to use...

 

That's right. The tooling/software I use it clear and how to deploy.

But I'm talking about environments in/on how to use them on a notebook used for business purposes.

Like should I create a new user for this, a VM, remote desktop, virtual desktop, client management software etc etc. What is best security-wise, and also software-management wise. Also, as stated, what about giving too much rights away on controlling my main machine with (Microsoft) managed, outsourced, IT-services and alike. I don't like giving too much control to other parties on my own notebook.

On 31/10/2022 at 23:16, kiddingguy said:

That's right. The tooling/software I use it clear and how to deploy.

But I'm talking about environments in/on how to use them on a notebook used for business purposes.

Like should I create a new user for this, a VM, remote desktop, virtual desktop, client management software etc etc. What is best security-wise, and also software-management wise. Also, as stated, what about giving too much rights away on controlling my main machine with (Microsoft) managed, outsourced, IT-services and alike. I don't like giving too much control to other parties on my own notebook.

You will want a machine with more ram if you are going to be using VMs. 8GB won’t be sufficient. 

On 01/11/2022 at 16:16, kiddingguy said:

That's right. The tooling/software I use it clear and how to deploy.

But I'm talking about environments in/on how to use them on a notebook used for business purposes.

Like should I create a new user for this, a VM, remote desktop, virtual desktop, client management software etc etc. What is best security-wise, and also software-management wise. Also, as stated, what about giving too much rights away on controlling my main machine with (Microsoft) managed, outsourced, IT-services and alike. I don't like giving too much control to other parties on my own notebook.

Then ask them to provide a machine... And just install the software, as per normal.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!