Clean Install or Not Clean Install Windows 11 On Supported Desktop


Recommended Posts

Hello All

 

My Last System clean install was Christmas 2020 when i got my Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500GB M.2 NvMe drive,     Would it be a waste of TIme or a good thing to do prior to installing any new PC Games at Christmas or Software?     I do have System image backup, but my 8TB drive ran out of space, so unforuately i no longer have the base Image from the original clean install..     

 

Plan on making a new image after this clean install, then updating it every so often, and incremental backups for other times, hoping to keep the base image this time hopefully i'll have enough space to for once

*May Or May Not make the 4TB drive that is currently Internal on Main Desktop external again if i can afford a newer enclosure, and resume using WD Black 1TB Internally for Music Storage/Photos, and a Few Small Programs that doesn't need Speed of SSD Drives,  Games are all on Game Sata SSD (1TB)     Currently the WD Black 1TB  is used on occasion with Hard drive dock, but may or may not on next dust clean out, after i have the newer enclosure for the 4TB, swap things around for good.--Last time i just restored from Full Image of the Storage drive to the 4TB on Previous clean install

 

 

Well that answers that then lol,  guess i'll wait til i have a real reason for Main Desktop and Secondary Machine Laptop,  or one of the drives kicks the bucket, then i know i'll have to for sure.      

 

Laptop i'd upgrade the M.2 SSD in that one, and then definitely would be time for clean install, but 10th Screw still won't budge no matter what i try, guess when i got more money, get it to local shop and let them upgrade the M.2 in that one,  the 8GB of Ram at same time (to 16GB max it can hold i believe)    

 

Desktop running very well, no issues to report,  just thought would do a clean install, since haven't done one in ages on the Desktop machine, but yeah i guess waste of time, and all the reconfiguring and such

 

Edited by bikeman25
On 22/12/2022 at 15:28, bikeman25 said:

Well that answers that then lol,  guess i'll wait til i have a real reason for Main Desktop and Secondary Machine Laptop,  or one of the drives kicks the bucket, then i know i'll have to for sure.

 

Just clone the HDD to the m.2 ..boom done!

Well only have 1 M.2 Slot (boot drive) so don't plan on upgrading the M.2 anytime soon in the Desktop unless it goes bad

Drive Config is 

500GB Boot Drive NvMe in the Desktop

1TB Game SSD

and 4TB Storage Drive for Music/Photos/Videos like game captures that i take sometimes

Used Space on Internal 4TB is about 476GB currently

 

Laptop M.2 128GB, but so far working fine there as well,  and the Storage drive on Laptop 1TB Hitachi, til i can get that upgraded as well

 

Don't a see a reason that i have to clone anything as yet, typically make system images with Macrium Reflect every so often as my backup, in addition to One Drive bit of Backed up files

 

 

 

Assuming you don't install a bunch of random junk, which I am guessing you don't, you should be able to last AT LEAST 2-3 years without a clean install of Windows. but if you don't install much stuff in general, you may be able to go many years without a clean install. still, I would probably do at least one clean install every 5 years max if for no other reason to keep things fresh and clean up any left over junk.

but I would avoid Windows 11 for now, especially if you play games as you are more likely to have issues vs the more standardized Windows 10. plus, there is no real rush to leave Windows 10 yet anyways since it's supported until Oct 2025. I would see how things are in say early 2025 and then go from there.

p.s. I am on Linux Mint, so I typically do a clean install between major versions (as major versions it's best to clean install but small point release updates it's okay to update is the general word), which are 2 years apart. in other words... I don't clean install any sooner than this, but more typically probably no later than 3 years or so even though one could technically wait closer to 5 years if they really wanted to since that's how long each major version is supported. all of the small amount of games I play/replay work on Linux through Lutris etc.

Well been on Windows 11 for over a year now on desktop. Nope I don't install much junk at all.   Yes will do clean install once every 5 years though for sure

 

 

 

Now I'm finally able to upgrade my PC to Win11 ( TPM2.0 was always enabled, but it didn't tell me my HD needed to be GPT and not MBR, thanks Microsoft), I'm tempted to do it. It won't be a clean install, really can't be assed. My Win10 has been installed for over 160 years (recently ghosted over to a 1tb M,2 drive). It has a few issues with ownership gripes and other foibles, but its pretty damn solid. Just not sure if I'm gonna like Win11, but thats by the by. To answer the OP question...YES, fresh install (especially if you get issues you don't know how to solve)....I just can't be bothered with all the hassle of getting my system back to how I've got it now, all comfy and familiar...maybe on my next PC build I will....Merry Christmas folks!

Say, when going from 10 to 11, I would do a clean installation. The first time I tried 11 I just installed over and got a few errors over time. Having said that, 11 is a downgrade, so I'm back on 10 and used backup to return to 10. But that's the only time I would clean install. Going to a new op. Will clean when I upgrade to 12, when it comes out. If it's as bad as 11, Linux, here I come.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
On 11/01/2023 at 05:54, DKAngel said:

it does a clean install, and then merges all your files and settings back into it anyways

Not quite. It’s closer to an in-place upgrade. If it were a clean install and then merging files back in, the registry hives would not get updated. 

  • Like 1

This machine is running Windows 10 right now or did you do an update to Windows 11 since your last clean install? Either way I would always suggest a clean install when going to a new version of Windows. Forget what the others are saying... When you are moving to a new version of Windows that would be a good time to do a clean install.

Edited by Good Bot, Bad Bot

I always clean install. I do so twice a year as part of miniatous since WIndows 98 to prevent winrot.

In this day and age with SSDs you can be back and up within a few hours if you back your data up on other drives or with Onedrive or Drop box for your files. Ni nite has all your free apps

Yeah when  22H2 Released, i just did in place upgrade thru WIndows Update,  but yeah in the future gonna probably do one sometime soon here when i got time to tackle that task.     

Perhaps on birthday in February if i get any newer hardware or software--then might go ahead and do the clean install then

 

Machine been running Windows 11 since clean install on October 6th 2021

Inplace upgrade from 21H2 to 22H2 via Windows Update not too long ago, and Moment update later in October

 

boot drive is NvMe SSD

Data is backed up to External and Onedrive

System is imaged with Macrium Reflect Home Edition (but probably will conduct clean install, then make a fresh backup in the future and use that if i ever need to restore in the future i think best, as backup drive ran out of space and lost the original clean install base image from 2021 lol, this time gonna make sure i keep the base image as now i got 2 8TB drives, so backing up Desktop & Laptop and 3rd Desktop should be fine to do to 1 of the drives, and keep base image on 2nd 8TB Drive i think

 

 

Edited by bikeman25

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!