Advice for buying a 3.5" HDD USB enclosure


Recommended Posts

I am looking for a reasonably priced 3.5" HDD USB enclosure.

I will be popping a 18 TB Western Digital Purple Pro HDD into it.

I have found the following enclosures that support 18TB hard drives and include a 12v power adapter:

Yottamaster DF6
Supports UASP, unsure about TRIM
£25 from Amazon UK

Orico CP35C3
Supports UASP / TRIM
£29 from Amazon UK

Orico M35C3
Supports UASP / TRIM
£35 from Amazon UK

These supports 18TB hard drives, but are not available in the UK:

  • LC-Power LC-35U3-C
  • Orico HM35C3
  • Orico 3139U3

Any thoughts on the three above that are available in the UK?

I haven't heard of Yottamaster. Could be a UK thing.

TBH, just buy with the look vs price. I had good experiences with Sabrent or Orico.

I currently have this one (in US) https://www.amazon.com/Sabrent-External-Lay-Flat-Docking-EC-DFLT/dp/B00LS5NFQ2/ref=sr_1_3?crid=2G4JIFPGEIBSA&keywords=hdd+external+case&qid=1675990661&sprefix=hdd+external+case%2Caps%2C121&sr=8-3

They pretty much all work the same..

  • Like 2

I got a Orico 6518US3 (v1) 2.5"/3.5" HDD enclosure (USB3) (i.e. https://www.orico.cc/us/product/detail/3534.html ; mine basically looks the same but I got a power button about a inch above the Orico logo. NOT in the back of the unit like shown. but I wonder if they changed to that setup with later models since mine is 'v1' and I heard some people having issues with power button years ago but I don't know the details as I never had a issue with mine but I always leave the units power switch to a ON state (see below)) that I think supports up to 8TB probably some odd years ago now which I think ill be good for many years to come as I can't see myself using a hard drive larger than 8TB in that anytime soon since even if I were to get a hard drive larger than 8TB, it will almost certainly go into my main PC and one of the HDD's currently in my main PC (which are all in the 4-6TB range) would be removed to use externally on this Orico unit for external storage.

I leave my power switch on the device always on and have it connected to a power station that I can simply flip a switch to turn it off (so it's kind of like unplugging the AC adapter and plugging it back in by flipping the switch on my power station). so for example with the unit off, I slide in a hard drive into the unit, then flip power switch, it powers up and I do some transfers, after that's done, I unmount the device and safety disconnect it from the OS, then power off the switch.

also, if I plan on letting a hard drive run in that unit for any length of time I got a external USB powered 120mm fan I sit on top to blow some air across it to keep heat down on 3.5" HDD's.

p.s. I use this unit on Linux and it works out-of-the-box. also, I have that Orico unit plugged into a USB 3 port on a Vantec USB3 device (model = UGT-PC345) connected to my motherboards PCI-E x1 slot on my main PC to give it a USB3 ports as my motherboard only has USB2 (I had my motherboard since May 2012). I also have another device to give me a couple of front USB3 ports that I connected to that PCI-E Vantec devices 20-pin connector.

Edited by ThaCrip
On 10/02/2023 at 15:03, ThaCrip said:

I got a Orico 6518US3 (v1) 2.5"/3.5" HDD enclosure (USB3) (i.e. https://www.orico.cc/us/product/detail/3534.html ; mine basically looks the same but I got a power button about a inch above the Orico logo. NOT in the back of the unit like shown. but I wonder if they changed to that setup with later models since mine is 'v1' and I heard some people having issues with power button years ago but I don't know the details as I never had a issue with mine but I always leave the units power switch to a ON state (see below)) that I think supports up to 8TB probably some odd years ago now which I think ill be good for many years to come as I can't see myself using a hard drive larger than 8TB in that anytime soon since even if I were to get a hard drive larger than 8TB, it will almost certainly go into my main PC and one of the HDD's currently in my main PC (which are all in the 4-6TB range) would be removed to use externally on this Orico unit for external storage.

I leave my power switch on the device always on and have it connected to a power station that I can simply flip a switch to turn it off (so it's kind of like unplugging the AC adapter and plugging it back in by flipping the switch on my power station). so for example with the unit off, I slide in a hard drive into the unit, then flip power switch, it powers up and I do some transfers, after that's done, I unmount the device and safety disconnect it from the OS, then power off the switch.

also, if I plan on letting a hard drive run in that unit for any length of time I got a external USB powered 120mm fan I sit on top to blow some air across it to keep heat down on 3.5" HDD's.

p.s. I use this unit on Linux and it works out-of-the-box. also, I have that Orico unit plugged into a USB 3 port on a Vantec USB3 device (model = UGT-PC345) connected to my motherboards PCI-E x1 slot on my main PC to give it a USB3 ports as my motherboard only has USB2 (I had my motherboard since May 2012). I also have another device to give me a couple of front USB3 ports that I connected to that PCI-E Vantec devices 20-pin connector.

What sort of R/W speeds are you getting with the drive in the enclosure? Much difference compared to having the hard drive directly connected to a Sata port?

I got one ORICO which died on me and it was a very common issue after 1| year or so, do not recommend it.

I have had this for more than 3 years and works excellent. Hugely recommended:

 

https://www.vantecusa.com/products_detail.php?p_id=46&p_name=NexStar+TX%2C+USB+3.0+Hard+Drive+External+Enclosure&pc_id=2&pc_name=3.5"+Enclosures&pt_id=1&pt_name=Hard+Drive+Enclosures

On 09/02/2023 at 20:00, Mindovermaster said:

I haven't heard of Yottamaster. Could be a UK thing.

TBH, just buy with the look vs price. I had good experiences with Sabrent or Orico.

I currently have this one (in US) https://www.amazon.com/Sabrent-External-Lay-Flat-Docking-EC-DFLT/dp/B00LS5NFQ2/ref=sr_1_3?crid=2G4JIFPGEIBSA&keywords=hdd+external+case&qid=1675990661&sprefix=hdd+external+case%2Caps%2C121&sr=8-3

They pretty much all work the same..

I have had no problem with Sabrent. I would recommend them. 

Hello,

Some general things I look for in an external USB enclosure:

  • all metal housing (preferred) or at least a mixture of metal and plastic
  • some form of shock mounting (silicone grommets for drive on the inside, rubber bumpers or casing on the outside, etc.)
  • uses standard, replaceable screws
  • if requiring external power (for a 3.5" or 5.25" drive), either has an internal power supply (more common for 5.25") or uses a common, barrel connector of a standard size and voltage.
  • power switch (if drive is externally powered)
  • unobtrusive activity and/or power LEDs

The last few enclosures I have purchased were from Oyen Digital, but OWS (aka MacSales) sells some of the same models as well.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

I always recommend sabrent. I have had there enclosures and docks for over 10 years and not a single one has broke or not given me the speeds I expected. At an old job, we use to ship 2-4T hard drives with data to customers as their "delivery" of the project work and not a single customer complained about the enclosures. We used Sabrent for those because I wanted to try them out and they did well. We bought over 100 in the first year and not a single one was DOA or didnt work as advertised. 

This is the newer version of what we use to order and works great: https://www.amazon.com/Sabrent-Tool-Free-Enclosure-Internal-EC-KSL3/dp/B08J5SLTJX/ref=sr_1_3?crid=22FAP5BRVSX8Q&keywords=sabrent+enclosure+3.5&qid=1676073079&sprefix=sabrent+enclosure+%2Caps%2C115&sr=8-3

I recently got this because my dock was old and I wanted a more enclosure style dock and it works great: https://www.amazon.com/Sabrent-External-Lay-Flat-Docking-EC-DFLT/dp/B00LS5NFQ2/ref=sr_1_19?crid=2J7JHA9BP1Z28&keywords=sabrent+enclosure&qid=1676073144&sprefix=fingerprint%2Caps%2C153&sr=8-19

I put it through copying 6Ts of data onto an 8T and it did it at full USB 3 speeds without any slow downs, dropped files, etc. Highly recommend these enclosure

  • Like 1
On 10/02/2023 at 08:49, PaulATMOS said:

What sort of R/W speeds are you getting with the drive in the enclosure? Much difference compared to having the hard drive directly connected to a Sata port?

Basically the same. things are only limited by the hard drive itself, not the SATA/USB3 interface. so everything is as fast as expected.

but it's not surprising as even SATA II tops out at pretty much 300MB/s (SATA III I think is double that at 600MB/s) which is faster than the hard drives and I think even the basic USB3 is at least 300MB/s to which is faster than I think pretty much all hard drives currently...

...because I was looking at a random review of a 14TB Seagate (to get a ball park feel of things) and even that don't seem to be able to get more than about 250MB/s tops with average speed across whole drive being about 200MB/s etc which even SATA II can keep up with since it's 300MB/s. but even when hard drives start exceeding 300MB/s barrier, it's probably not going to have much effect in general unless until they exceed that 300MB/s barrier quite a bit. basically SATA II level speed is not going to become a problem for the foreseeable future for people in general and just about everyone has at least SATA II connection speeds unless their computer is fairly ancient as even my backup computer from 2005-2006 (I built it in March 2006 but it's pretty much high end 2005 tech) has SATA II ports on the motherboard. hell, even if someone has original SATA (SATA I), that's I think limited to 150MB/s which would still not be bad for a random hard drive since even on hard drives that do exceed 150MB/s, it won't be by all that much. but I guess if someone was filling a hard drive at SATA I speeds of 150MB/s and say they had a really large HDD that could average about 200MB/s, while that would add hours to the total transfer time to fill the drive by losing say about 50MB/s, all-in-all even 150MB/s ain't bad. and like I was saying, there is probably not many computers still in use that don't have at least SATA II connections at this point in time.

Edited by ThaCrip

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!