What if we ever actually stop existing?


Recommended Posts

Nobody understands life because we can't prove what's beyond it.

But if we take what we know about the universe as an example, in which nothing is wasted and dying suns and solar systems are repurposed for new, nothing is wasted and everything is reused. If we applied the same logic to life, then it makes sense to assume that when the life ends the energy or entity from it that we can't measure or understand is repurposed.

Reincarnation doesn't make sense to me because you'd have a fixed number of souls reincarnating, yet the world population keeps expanding, from which souls did the extra billions reincarnate? Religion does not have the answer to life, it simply tries to place a narrative on it.

Personally I think that when we step out of this life we're thrust into a new one immediately and the question is, why would it have to be another human male (in my case) could it be an ant, another living thing, a tree?

Not knowing is also frustrating.

  • Like 3
On 28/02/2023 at 01:46, Steven P. said:

Personally I think that when we step out of this life we're thrust into a new one immediately 

What led you to that belief?

"it makes sense to assume that when the life ends the energy or entity from it that we can't measure or understand"

Why does it make sense? There is no evidence of a spirit or life force.

On 27/02/2023 at 16:16, foolsfolly said:

What led you to that belief?

Because of what science tells us how the universe works, in that nothing is ever wasted or "dies" it (all of the atoms) is immediately repurposed.

That is on the grandest scale in our comprehension.

We all stop existing at some point. Regardless of beliefs, there is going to be one day where you stop moving and people will mourn or celebrate that idea.

What happens after that? Some people say they remember past lifes, others say that they believe they will have future lives without any knowledge of what they were doing before.

I can't say that I remember anything previous to this life. So I think that we have this and that is it. I will die, and while my body wiill decay and become something else it won't become me. I am me, here and now.

I'm a firm believer of the quantum multi-verse theory.

I do believe there are multiple time streams and branches and when we die it's likely our energy is dispersed between multiple parallel lines. So in this sense it could make sense that you could have a sense of past life, if you have a bigger chunk of said dispersed energy from any one individual; and why the memories don't always line up with how things would have been in your present world.

this next part could be quite controversial for religious. concepts such as heaven/hell could easily be different time streams or even just the collective unconscious of energy coming together before it disperses again for new life.

  • Like 3
On 28/02/2023 at 02:27, Nick H. said:

We all stop existing at some point. Regardless of beliefs, there is going to be one day where you stop moving and people will mourn or celebrate that idea.

What happens after that? Some people say they remember past lifes, others say that they believe they will have future lives without any knowledge of what they were doing before.

I can't say that I remember anything previous to this life. So I think that we have this and that is it. I will die, and while my body wiill decay and become something else it won't become me. I am me, here and now.

These agonizing questions that we all ponder at some point in our lives are partly what led humans to invent God's and religion.

 

  • Like 2
On 28/02/2023 at 02:19, Steven P. said:

Because of what science tells us how the universe works, in that nothing is ever wasted or "dies" it (all of the atoms) is immediately repurposed.

That is on the grandest scale in our comprehension.

I mean no offense Steven but that is a very simplistic view of matter never being wasted. 

On 27/02/2023 at 09:19, Steven P. said:

Because of what science tells us how the universe works, in that nothing is ever wasted or "dies" it (all of the atoms) is immediately repurposed.

That is on the grandest scale in our comprehension.

Well, I believe based the current cosmological theories that we simply break down into our base carbon based components and become absorbed into the earth - we decay. There is no 'energy' to go anywhere. We are just carbon based 'things'. When our sun eventually expands to engulf the earth, the elements that make up the earth are then 'recycled' as elements in the sun. When our sun eventually collapses into a dwarf white star if will have shed great quantities of carbon back into space (some of which will be from you and me).  

On 28/02/2023 at 02:28, Brandon H said:

I'm a firm believer of the quantum multi-verse theory.

I do believe there are multiple time streams and branches and when we die it's likely our energy is dispersed between multiple parallel lines. So in this sense it could make sense that you could have a sense of past life, if you have a bigger chunk of said dispersed energy from any one individual; and why the memories don't always line up with how things would have been in your present world.

this next part could be quite controversial for religious. concepts such as heaven/hell could easily be different time streams or even just the collective unconscious of energy coming together before it disperses again for new life.

Come now. How can you be a 'firm believer' in the multiverse? It's pure hypothetical at this point and has several heavy hitters in the science community unconvinced.

The time to be a 'firm believer' is when the evidence is there to support it.

 

On 28/02/2023 at 02:37, Biscuits Brown said:

Well, I believe based the current cosmological theories that we simply break down into our base carbon based components and become absorbed into the earth - we decay. There is no 'energy' to go anywhere. We are just carbon based 'things'. When our sun eventually expands to engulf the earth, the elements that make up the earth are then 'recycled' as elements in the sun. When our sun eventually collapses into a dwarf white star if will have shed great quantities of carbon back into space (some of which will be from you and me).  

We are all stardust.

On 27/02/2023 at 16:35, foolsfolly said:

I mean no offense Steven but that is a very simplistic view of matter never being wasted. 

Absolutely if you ignore what the "life"/conscience/the mind entity is. I wasn't only talking about the physical things that made up our bodies or universe.

On 27/02/2023 at 16:37, Biscuits Brown said:

Well, I believe based the current cosmological theories that we simply break down into our base carbon based components and become absorbed into the earth - we decay. There is no 'energy' to go anywhere. We are just carbon based 'things'. When our sun eventually expands to engulf the earth, the elements that make up the earth are then 'recycled' as elements in the sun. When our sun eventually collapses into a dwarf white star if will have shed great quantities of carbon back into space (some of which will be from you and me).  

Absolutely if you ignore what the "life"/conscience/the mind entity is.  I wasn't only talking about the physical things that made up our bodies or universe.

  • Like 2
On 27/02/2023 at 09:40, foolsfolly said:

Come now. How can you be a 'firm believer' in the multiverse? It's pure hypothetical at this point and has several heavy hitters in the science community unconvinced.

The time to be a 'firm believer' is when the evidence is there to support it.

 

We are all stardust.

well 'firm' is a strong word yes. but it makes a certain amount of sense when thinking about certain aspects.

Could the theories be completely wrong? sure. but with our current level of technology we have no way to prove either way; we're just starting to scratch the surface of quantum mechanics. I'm not going to fight someone tooth and nail to prove "I'm Right". There's enough of that kind of argument with current modern organized religions.

edit: I'm of the type that just wants to live my current life to the fullest while treating those around me with kindness. When its my time to go then I'll find out.

  • Like 5
On 28/02/2023 at 02:52, Steven P. said:

Absolutely if you ignore what the "life"/conscience/the mind entity is. I wasn't only talking about the physical things that made up our bodies or universe.

I don't follow. What is this "life"/conscience/the mind entity in your view?

You mention conscience. There is no conscience absent a brain. Are you aware of any universal conscience absent a brain?

Should we be using 'conscious' instead of 'conscience'?

  • Dislike 1
On 27/02/2023 at 18:08, foolsfolly said:

I don't follow. What is this "life"/conscience/the mind entity in your view?

You mention conscience. There is no conscience absent a brain. Are you aware of any universal conscience absent a brain?

You don't have to "follow" make up your own mind. :) 

On 28/02/2023 at 04:11, Steven P. said:

You don't have to "follow" make up your own mind. :) 

I mean 'follow' as in I'm not following your line of thinking. You're correct of course in that we all must make our own minds up.

 

  • 1 month later...

Just an edit, I didn't realize this was an old topic, sorry if I broke the rules about old topics, thought the topic was intersting enough for me to give my two bob thoughts!

 

I do tend to wonder at what point we all stop existing,  but I suppose that what death is for to find out whether there is an afterlife. Personally, I believe whatever floats your boat is what you think is beyond this life.

I am a Christian, so I do tend to think I'll be going to heaven (or hell depending on you look at the bible and context) , but I also know that there are people out there who want to tend to think there is re-incarnation. Wouldn't it be awesome though we could pick what happens to us at the end of our current life?

  • Like 2
  • 3 weeks later...

You're a mere congregation of energy, questioning its own existence, no more or less significant than sandwich mustard. In the material world, in which you've inferred a stable and consistent purpose, you resemble a skipping stone on water, with the grand splendor of life experienced only from a relative and possibly isolated perspective. The beauty of that skipping stone lost on an Ant in Africa but bewildering a child in Spain as it skips, seemingly forever, challenging all they know... Until it sinks. As for proving your relevance or subjectivity, you're as tangible as an abstract artwork. A paradoxical existence, both inconsequential and infinitely precious, like a drop of water in an endless ocean. Give no more or less precedence than deserved in the notions of a beyond.

Life's meaning, intertwined with quantum probabilities, suggests that our essence exists in a state of flux. Upon death, our energy may be repurposed in various forms, transcending the constraints of fixed souls or reincarnation. This continuous rebirth, unrestricted by species or matter, highlights the complex interconnectedness of existence. Embracing this uncertainty, we find ourselves resonating with the universe's grand quantum symphony. Frustration is without merit, as you're already within this cosmic dance of particles and forces. You are as you have always been since the birth of the universe and you'll remain in this flux for trillions of years.

  • Like 3

You know what, I used to agonise over questions like this for hours in my early 20s. 20 years later, do you know what my mantra is now? "enjoy the passing of time".

I've come to the conclusion that a) if there is an all-consuming purpose to life as we know it, it will present itself so there's little point searching for it, b) certainly in this guise, all of our evidence to date suggests that we only get one turn on this crazy ride, so just do you, try not to upset people but don't take their crap, and try to "enjoy the passing of time".

For me, enjoyment is the one thing I'm striving for. From enjoyment comes joy.

On 27/02/2023 at 09:46, Steven P. said:

Nobody understands life because we can't prove what's beyond it.

Some understand life as there is enough evidence (that's at least plausible) out there for those who can see it.

basically Christianity is the Truth. Jesus Resurrected ('Shroud of Turin' is further evidence for this (before anyone brings it up, that 1988 radio carbon dating test is not valid as the piece that was tested was from a repaired portion of the Shroud basically)) etc. basically that's the general point of life here on earth is a test whether we ultimately side with God (i.e. The Holy Trinity (Father/Son(Jesus Christ/Holy Spirit)) or against Him as we all will ultimately end up in Heaven with God (eternal joy) or hell with Satan (eternal suffering/misery) as those are the only two final destinations after we pass from this life into the next.

but in the end for some people (basically the hard-line atheist types especially), it pretty much boils down to... "To one who has faith, no explanation is necessary. To one without faith, no explanation is possible." - St. Thomas Aquinas

or another way to put it... those who want that hardcore definitive proof of whether there is life beyond the hear-and-now on earth, you will simply not get that level of concrete proof that pretty much everyone will acknowledge (although it appears they got people with near-death experiences of people seeing stuff they could not possibly know, which is another reason the soul/our consciousness lives on once our bodies are dead). faith is required on some level as it's just the way things are ;)

but personally I never understood the atheist mindset of 'There is no God. period.' as it makes more sense to be, at minimum, agnostic, or a more towards a believer than atheist if you got to choose between the two given all of the stuff out there in the world. but for some people... it's like they don't want to believe there is a ultimate source of good/evil because then they might have to change their lives and that there is consequences for how they live their lives as some might not want to change as they prefer their sin over God etc.

just some thoughts ;)

On 12/05/2023 at 17:18, ThaCrip said:

Some understand life as there is enough evidence (that's at least plausible) out there for those who can see it.

basically Christianity is the Truth.

Sorry, but I stopped here. My family support Christianity, but they accept other people and their faiths - or in my case, the lack of. They would never say that their belief is The Truth, they would merely say that it is their belief in things.

Saying that something as open as this question has an absolute answer invalidates your argument for me.

  • Like 3

Ah, the one question that has been bothering us since our existence. Always fascinating to see various perspectives and beliefs. Keep it coming, guys.

I am a firm believer of "Live and let live". It is OK to believe in whatever you think happens to us, as long as you keep it to yourself and respect others' beliefs too. Just try to be a good person and be of benefit to the society and the planet while you are alive.

That being said, I am a practicing Hindu and kind of go with that flow. There's a lot of discussion and commentaries regarding this topic in Vedic literature. Some make sense, some don't.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!