What if we ever actually stop existing?


Recommended Posts

Nobody understands life because we can't prove what's beyond it.

But if we take what we know about the universe as an example, in which nothing is wasted and dying suns and solar systems are repurposed for new, nothing is wasted and everything is reused. If we applied the same logic to life, then it makes sense to assume that when the life ends the energy or entity from it that we can't measure or understand is repurposed.

Reincarnation doesn't make sense to me because you'd have a fixed number of souls reincarnating, yet the world population keeps expanding, from which souls did the extra billions reincarnate? Religion does not have the answer to life, it simply tries to place a narrative on it.

Personally I think that when we step out of this life we're thrust into a new one immediately and the question is, why would it have to be another human male (in my case) could it be an ant, another living thing, a tree?

Not knowing is also frustrating.

  • Like 3
On 28/02/2023 at 01:46, Steven P. said:

Personally I think that when we step out of this life we're thrust into a new one immediately 

What led you to that belief?

"it makes sense to assume that when the life ends the energy or entity from it that we can't measure or understand"

Why does it make sense? There is no evidence of a spirit or life force.

On 27/02/2023 at 16:16, foolsfolly said:

What led you to that belief?

Because of what science tells us how the universe works, in that nothing is ever wasted or "dies" it (all of the atoms) is immediately repurposed.

That is on the grandest scale in our comprehension.

We all stop existing at some point. Regardless of beliefs, there is going to be one day where you stop moving and people will mourn or celebrate that idea.

What happens after that? Some people say they remember past lifes, others say that they believe they will have future lives without any knowledge of what they were doing before.

I can't say that I remember anything previous to this life. So I think that we have this and that is it. I will die, and while my body wiill decay and become something else it won't become me. I am me, here and now.

I'm a firm believer of the quantum multi-verse theory.

I do believe there are multiple time streams and branches and when we die it's likely our energy is dispersed between multiple parallel lines. So in this sense it could make sense that you could have a sense of past life, if you have a bigger chunk of said dispersed energy from any one individual; and why the memories don't always line up with how things would have been in your present world.

this next part could be quite controversial for religious. concepts such as heaven/hell could easily be different time streams or even just the collective unconscious of energy coming together before it disperses again for new life.

  • Like 3
On 28/02/2023 at 02:27, Nick H. said:

We all stop existing at some point. Regardless of beliefs, there is going to be one day where you stop moving and people will mourn or celebrate that idea.

What happens after that? Some people say they remember past lifes, others say that they believe they will have future lives without any knowledge of what they were doing before.

I can't say that I remember anything previous to this life. So I think that we have this and that is it. I will die, and while my body wiill decay and become something else it won't become me. I am me, here and now.

These agonizing questions that we all ponder at some point in our lives are partly what led humans to invent God's and religion.

 

  • Like 2
On 28/02/2023 at 02:19, Steven P. said:

Because of what science tells us how the universe works, in that nothing is ever wasted or "dies" it (all of the atoms) is immediately repurposed.

That is on the grandest scale in our comprehension.

I mean no offense Steven but that is a very simplistic view of matter never being wasted. 

On 27/02/2023 at 09:19, Steven P. said:

Because of what science tells us how the universe works, in that nothing is ever wasted or "dies" it (all of the atoms) is immediately repurposed.

That is on the grandest scale in our comprehension.

Well, I believe based the current cosmological theories that we simply break down into our base carbon based components and become absorbed into the earth - we decay. There is no 'energy' to go anywhere. We are just carbon based 'things'. When our sun eventually expands to engulf the earth, the elements that make up the earth are then 'recycled' as elements in the sun. When our sun eventually collapses into a dwarf white star if will have shed great quantities of carbon back into space (some of which will be from you and me).  

On 28/02/2023 at 02:28, Brandon H said:

I'm a firm believer of the quantum multi-verse theory.

I do believe there are multiple time streams and branches and when we die it's likely our energy is dispersed between multiple parallel lines. So in this sense it could make sense that you could have a sense of past life, if you have a bigger chunk of said dispersed energy from any one individual; and why the memories don't always line up with how things would have been in your present world.

this next part could be quite controversial for religious. concepts such as heaven/hell could easily be different time streams or even just the collective unconscious of energy coming together before it disperses again for new life.

Come now. How can you be a 'firm believer' in the multiverse? It's pure hypothetical at this point and has several heavy hitters in the science community unconvinced.

The time to be a 'firm believer' is when the evidence is there to support it.

 

On 28/02/2023 at 02:37, Biscuits Brown said:

Well, I believe based the current cosmological theories that we simply break down into our base carbon based components and become absorbed into the earth - we decay. There is no 'energy' to go anywhere. We are just carbon based 'things'. When our sun eventually expands to engulf the earth, the elements that make up the earth are then 'recycled' as elements in the sun. When our sun eventually collapses into a dwarf white star if will have shed great quantities of carbon back into space (some of which will be from you and me).  

We are all stardust.

On 27/02/2023 at 16:35, foolsfolly said:

I mean no offense Steven but that is a very simplistic view of matter never being wasted. 

Absolutely if you ignore what the "life"/conscience/the mind entity is. I wasn't only talking about the physical things that made up our bodies or universe.

On 27/02/2023 at 16:37, Biscuits Brown said:

Well, I believe based the current cosmological theories that we simply break down into our base carbon based components and become absorbed into the earth - we decay. There is no 'energy' to go anywhere. We are just carbon based 'things'. When our sun eventually expands to engulf the earth, the elements that make up the earth are then 'recycled' as elements in the sun. When our sun eventually collapses into a dwarf white star if will have shed great quantities of carbon back into space (some of which will be from you and me).  

Absolutely if you ignore what the "life"/conscience/the mind entity is.  I wasn't only talking about the physical things that made up our bodies or universe.

  • Like 2
On 27/02/2023 at 09:40, foolsfolly said:

Come now. How can you be a 'firm believer' in the multiverse? It's pure hypothetical at this point and has several heavy hitters in the science community unconvinced.

The time to be a 'firm believer' is when the evidence is there to support it.

 

We are all stardust.

well 'firm' is a strong word yes. but it makes a certain amount of sense when thinking about certain aspects.

Could the theories be completely wrong? sure. but with our current level of technology we have no way to prove either way; we're just starting to scratch the surface of quantum mechanics. I'm not going to fight someone tooth and nail to prove "I'm Right". There's enough of that kind of argument with current modern organized religions.

edit: I'm of the type that just wants to live my current life to the fullest while treating those around me with kindness. When its my time to go then I'll find out.

On 28/02/2023 at 02:52, Steven P. said:

Absolutely if you ignore what the "life"/conscience/the mind entity is. I wasn't only talking about the physical things that made up our bodies or universe.

I don't follow. What is this "life"/conscience/the mind entity in your view?

You mention conscience. There is no conscience absent a brain. Are you aware of any universal conscience absent a brain?

Should we be using 'conscious' instead of 'conscience'?

  • Dislike 1
On 27/02/2023 at 18:08, foolsfolly said:

I don't follow. What is this "life"/conscience/the mind entity in your view?

You mention conscience. There is no conscience absent a brain. Are you aware of any universal conscience absent a brain?

You don't have to "follow" make up your own mind. :) 

On 28/02/2023 at 04:11, Steven P. said:

You don't have to "follow" make up your own mind. :) 

I mean 'follow' as in I'm not following your line of thinking. You're correct of course in that we all must make our own minds up.

 

  • 1 month later...

Just an edit, I didn't realize this was an old topic, sorry if I broke the rules about old topics, thought the topic was intersting enough for me to give my two bob thoughts!

 

I do tend to wonder at what point we all stop existing,  but I suppose that what death is for to find out whether there is an afterlife. Personally, I believe whatever floats your boat is what you think is beyond this life.

I am a Christian, so I do tend to think I'll be going to heaven (or hell depending on you look at the bible and context) , but I also know that there are people out there who want to tend to think there is re-incarnation. Wouldn't it be awesome though we could pick what happens to us at the end of our current life?

  • Like 2
  • 3 weeks later...

You're a mere congregation of energy, questioning its own existence, no more or less significant than sandwich mustard. In the material world, in which you've inferred a stable and consistent purpose, you resemble a skipping stone on water, with the grand splendor of life experienced only from a relative and possibly isolated perspective. The beauty of that skipping stone lost on an Ant in Africa but bewildering a child in Spain as it skips, seemingly forever, challenging all they know... Until it sinks. As for proving your relevance or subjectivity, you're as tangible as an abstract artwork. A paradoxical existence, both inconsequential and infinitely precious, like a drop of water in an endless ocean. Give no more or less precedence than deserved in the notions of a beyond.

Life's meaning, intertwined with quantum probabilities, suggests that our essence exists in a state of flux. Upon death, our energy may be repurposed in various forms, transcending the constraints of fixed souls or reincarnation. This continuous rebirth, unrestricted by species or matter, highlights the complex interconnectedness of existence. Embracing this uncertainty, we find ourselves resonating with the universe's grand quantum symphony. Frustration is without merit, as you're already within this cosmic dance of particles and forces. You are as you have always been since the birth of the universe and you'll remain in this flux for trillions of years.

  • Like 3

You know what, I used to agonise over questions like this for hours in my early 20s. 20 years later, do you know what my mantra is now? "enjoy the passing of time".

I've come to the conclusion that a) if there is an all-consuming purpose to life as we know it, it will present itself so there's little point searching for it, b) certainly in this guise, all of our evidence to date suggests that we only get one turn on this crazy ride, so just do you, try not to upset people but don't take their crap, and try to "enjoy the passing of time".

For me, enjoyment is the one thing I'm striving for. From enjoyment comes joy.

On 27/02/2023 at 09:46, Steven P. said:

Nobody understands life because we can't prove what's beyond it.

Some understand life as there is enough evidence (that's at least plausible) out there for those who can see it.

basically Christianity is the Truth. Jesus Resurrected ('Shroud of Turin' is further evidence for this (before anyone brings it up, that 1988 radio carbon dating test is not valid as the piece that was tested was from a repaired portion of the Shroud basically)) etc. basically that's the general point of life here on earth is a test whether we ultimately side with God (i.e. The Holy Trinity (Father/Son(Jesus Christ/Holy Spirit)) or against Him as we all will ultimately end up in Heaven with God (eternal joy) or hell with Satan (eternal suffering/misery) as those are the only two final destinations after we pass from this life into the next.

but in the end for some people (basically the hard-line atheist types especially), it pretty much boils down to... "To one who has faith, no explanation is necessary. To one without faith, no explanation is possible." - St. Thomas Aquinas

or another way to put it... those who want that hardcore definitive proof of whether there is life beyond the hear-and-now on earth, you will simply not get that level of concrete proof that pretty much everyone will acknowledge (although it appears they got people with near-death experiences of people seeing stuff they could not possibly know, which is another reason the soul/our consciousness lives on once our bodies are dead). faith is required on some level as it's just the way things are ;)

but personally I never understood the atheist mindset of 'There is no God. period.' as it makes more sense to be, at minimum, agnostic, or a more towards a believer than atheist if you got to choose between the two given all of the stuff out there in the world. but for some people... it's like they don't want to believe there is a ultimate source of good/evil because then they might have to change their lives and that there is consequences for how they live their lives as some might not want to change as they prefer their sin over God etc.

just some thoughts ;)

On 12/05/2023 at 17:18, ThaCrip said:

Some understand life as there is enough evidence (that's at least plausible) out there for those who can see it.

basically Christianity is the Truth.

Sorry, but I stopped here. My family support Christianity, but they accept other people and their faiths - or in my case, the lack of. They would never say that their belief is The Truth, they would merely say that it is their belief in things.

Saying that something as open as this question has an absolute answer invalidates your argument for me.

  • Like 3

Ah, the one question that has been bothering us since our existence. Always fascinating to see various perspectives and beliefs. Keep it coming, guys.

I am a firm believer of "Live and let live". It is OK to believe in whatever you think happens to us, as long as you keep it to yourself and respect others' beliefs too. Just try to be a good person and be of benefit to the society and the planet while you are alive.

That being said, I am a practicing Hindu and kind of go with that flow. There's a lot of discussion and commentaries regarding this topic in Vedic literature. Some make sense, some don't.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!