Do you like confirmation when deleting a file?


Do you like confirmation when deleting a file?  

60 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you like confirmation when deleting a file?

    • Yes
      32
    • No
      13
    • Yes but only for files i'm going to shift+delete
      15


Recommended Posts

By default Windows 8 / 10 / 11 disable the delete confirmation dialog box. That means if a file or folder is currently selected, when you press delete, instead of asking you if you wish to delete the file .. it goes *POOOF* into the recycle bin.

If you right click on the recycle bin and select properties you can select "Display delet confirmation dialog box"

Now when you delete a file you are prompted asking if you are sure you wish to delete it.

Iimage.png.b0f1c8140a1ad845420be3ff208fd717.png

Some people have told me they when deleting something they don't want to be bothered having to click yes. Personally I find it horrifying, that with that option off (Default), I could delete something and not even know it.

So the question of the day is

Do you like confirmation when deleting a file?

  • Like 2

I find few things more irritating than the old cycle of "Are you sure?"  then "Are you really sure?", then "Are you really REALLY sure?" nonsense.  If I clicked delete, it's because I want it gone... ESPECIALLY if I shift-deleted. Quit holding my hand, I'm not 5! :p

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Haven't answered the poll as it's not just a simple yes/no for me.

I don't mind the dialog for items that will delete right away without going to the recycle/trash bin for obvious reasons of that can't (easily) be undone.

As long as I can ctrl+z or go to the recycle/trash bin and restore a file if needed then I don't need to see a confirmation dialog.

  • Like 1
  On 03/03/2023 at 15:58, Brandon H said:

Haven't answered the poll as it's not just a simple yes/no for me.

I don't mind the dialog for items that will delete right away without going to the recycle/trash bin for obvious reasons of that can't (easily) be undone.

As long as I can ctrl+z or go to the recycle/trash bin and restore a file if needed then I don't need to see a confirmation dialog.

Expand  

Gave you an option.

 

Yes, I like it like it is.

it's the same on Linux Mint where in file manager if you have a file highlighted, press the 'delete' key, it instantly goes to the 'Trash' (Recycle Bin) and then one has to right click the Trash (either on desktop icon, which is not there by default on most recent Mint 21.1 or in the file manager), select 'empty trash' and then one final confirmation for it to be truly gone.

  On 03/03/2023 at 16:23, Warwagon said:

What happens on a network share when you press delete? does it go into a recycle bin? Or is it just erased?

Expand  

I just did a quick test on my Mint setup. my main PC (Mint 21.1-Xfce(all three of my computers use this)) has a Samba share on a certain folder location with create/write/delete access and pressing 'delete' on a folder in that share (so the laptop is accessing my main PC's share) it has the delete confirmation popup in the one with the Samba share before permanent deletion occurs and then allowing it to proceed permanently deletes the folder/file.

but on the other share I also have setup on my main PC through Samba, that has read-only access as I just ran a quick test by creating a folder in that share location on my main PC, then through another computer (laptop) I tried to delete that share through it's file manager accessing that share by pressing 'delete' key and the delete confirmation appears and I proceed to allow that confirmation to proceed but it errors saying no permission like expected since I set that share folder to read-only.

p.s. I primarily setup that Samba share (the one with create/write/delete access) on my main PC so when I use Clonezilla to image my two backup computers (a old desktop and a laptop) boot drive I can store the image it creates on my main PC's hard drive through the Samba share though the network.

 

  On 03/03/2023 at 16:23, Warwagon said:

What if you had a cat and it walks across your keyboard pressing delete?

Expand  

-Normal file manager would just imediately send it to the Recycle Bin (Trash).

-Pressing 'delete' accessing a Samba share through file manager has a delete confirmation dialog before permanent deletion.

Ever since Windows 95 introduced it I have always completely disabled the recycle bin and hidden it, so I do like to have the confirmation just in case I hit del by mistake or something. When I do want to delete a file I just hold shift and hit delete so I don't have to answer the confirmation anyway, but that's not something you can really do accidentally.

  • Like 2

The only time you should ever get a confirmation is when it's a permanent delete (eg. shift+delete) otherwise the recycle bin is your last defense.

  On 03/03/2023 at 22:27, Matthew S. said:

The only time you should ever get a confirmation is when it's a permanent delete (eg. shift+delete) otherwise the recycle bin is your last defense.

Expand  

assuming you knew it was in there. If when you ran something like ccleaner and by default it empties the recycle bin and you didn't know it was there.

I do like a confirmation box but from an efficiency point of view.

If I know I will need to delete some files in a moment - say, if something is unzipping then I used to be able to select the Zip file, click delete and then wait until it had finished.  This meant I could click away and go elsewhere and delete the file after it's finished unzipping.

I can't do that now, so it means I have to wait until it's finished before navigating away.

I haven't tested whether opening a new tab will deselect that file or not.

 

But I also enjoy filling the recycle bin as much as I can so when I eventually decide to empty it, I can watch all the little "how much space you have left indicators" go up.

I have the policy enabled for the confirmation for shift-delete, personally I do like that extra check when you're shift-deleting or emptying the recycle bin. It helps me prevent an "I done goofed" moment, especially for newer files that wouldn't be on a backup image yet. Regular recycle bin delete though nah it's unnecessary as it's not really deleted yet. 

  On 03/03/2023 at 15:54, FloatingFatMan said:

I find few things more irritating than the old cycle of "Are you sure?"  then "Are you really sure?", then "Are you really REALLY sure?" nonsense.  If I clicked delete, it's because I want it gone... ESPECIALLY if I shift-deleted. Quit holding my hand, I'm not 5! :p

 

Expand  

^^^^

Exactly

A single confirmation is all that is necessary for me however, if it is going to prompt me on every single file when trying to delete in bulk I will gain a furious need to harm someone lol.

I've got both of my systems set up so that it doesn't ask me to confirm. But it does move it to the recycle bin. I don't think that I've ever used shift+delete, perhaps because I'm too clumsy or never that sure that I want the file gone.

Case in point, while writing this I accidentally hit a wrong key and it removed almost all of what I had written. No big deal, but it's easier to have the fall-back of hitting Ctrl+Z when something goes wrong. :laugh:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Because Win7 was beautiful, much faster and more functional than XP. Win10 (glossing over 8 as many do) was slightly faster in some cases, more functional in some cases, but some people such as myself hated how it looked and decided it wasn't worth the upgrade. Some people liked (or were ok with) the look, and thus it is a good upgrade. Win11 is like 10, but is less functional between key features being removed and constant bugs/crashes either due to updates, or just things that were never patched. It literally has nothing going for it, and I use it every day at work so I'm quite familiar with it.
    • I switched my mom from Chrome to Firefox and she had a serious meltdown. She even managed to figure out how to reinstall Chrome, which really surprised me. What finally got her to switch was Chrome no longer being supported on Win7 and me putting a Chrome skin on FF, and setting it up identically.
    • Feels very much like most other gnome based Linux distros. There is minimal amounts that are influenced by Windows 11, maybe just enough to make people who are switching comfortable enough with the idea. As far as I can tell its mainly just turning the 'taskbar' panel as a 100% sized static panel, rather than the default dynamic sized. Turning it from the Mac OS Dock into the Windows taskbar. The Arc Menu - that I assume you're taking not with from the screenshots, is indeed the Windows 11 style one, but it has lots of other options too, from the more traditional gnome, Windows 7 etc. Still free to install what ever Window Manager you want once you're comfortable enough with Linux though.
    • Wow, and here I'm still happily using 1080p...
    • Added an extra filter to Fail2Ban.  I thought about just adding this to my existing aibots filter, but for the time being I'm keeping it separate because it's "possible" real humans may trigger this one so as long as it doesn't start filling my inbox I'd like to get notified about these so I can adjust it as necessary in the future. I'm still holding close to 10k unique IP addresses at any given time that have been banned via the "aibots" filter that looks for certain user agent strings of known AI scrapers.  However, I've been getting an increasing amount of traffic trying to scrape the site with sanitized user agent strings that just look like normal web browsers, however... Because I enabled authentication I can now see that they're racking up lots of 401 (unauthorized) responses in the Apache "access.log" file, but they're not triggering anything in the Apache "error.log" file, which is where failed attempts to log in would appear.  Basically, if an actual human tried to log in with an invalid username and password they don't immediately go into "access.log" as a 401, they go into "error.log" with a status message such as "user FOO not found".  The only way to trigger a 401 simply by visiting the site, as far as I'm aware, is to hit "Cancel" on the login prompt, or otherwise try to access files directly without properly authenticating. So, given the fact I'm getting a few thousand 401 errors a day from sanitized user agent strings that don't show up in "error.log", which means no attempt at logging in properly, I added another jail/filter set to Fail2Ban to immediately ban anybody who triggers a 401.  This feels a bit nuclear so I may need to adjust it in the future, but as far as I'm aware so far no real humans are being inconvenienced so all I'm doing is wasting the time of some AI scraper bots. Example log entry 61.170.149.70 - - [25/Jun/2025:20:01:04 -0400] "GET /content/mdwiki_en_all_maxi_2024-06/A/Neuroregeneration HTTP/1.1" 401 3287 "https://kiwix.marcusadams.me/content/mdwiki_en_all_maxi_2024-06/A/Neuroregeneration" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/114.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/114.0.1823.43" Contents of /etc/fail2ban/filter.d/apache-401repeat.conf #Fail2Ban filter for bots and scrapers that try to access #files directly without entering credentials for apache2-auth #and therefore trigger lots of 401 errors without triggering #the apache-auth jail. # #Marcus Dean Adams [Definition] failregex = ^<HOST> .+\" 401 \d+ .*$ Contents of /etc/fail2ban/jail.d/apache-401repeat.local [apache-401repeat] enabled = true ignoreip = 10.1.1.1 port = 80,443 filter = apache-401repeat maxretry = 1 bantime = 672h findtime = 10m logpath = /var/log/apache2/access.log Oh, and all this traffic is AFTER I explicitly banned Alibaba's IP ranges that were absolutely blowing me up day and night. Observation; two of the IP addresses that have triggered this jail in the 30 or so minutes since I turned it on were owned by Microsoft.  Wonder if they're doing their own AI scraping/probing, or if that's just an Azure VM owned by somebody else.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rising Star
      Phillip0web went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      Epaminombas earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Bert Fershner earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Reacting Well
      ChrisOdinUK earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Year In
      Steviant earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      552
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      208
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      175
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      152
    5. 5
      Som
      139
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!