Test Windows 11 ARM on x86?


Recommended Posts

Hello! Is there a way to test Windows 11 ARM on x86? I am thinking of switching from PC to Mac m2 with Parallels running Windows 11. I maintain a .NET Framework Winforms app that requires x86 and that's the only thing that really prevents me from just switching to macOS full time.

Is there a way to test the ARM version and it's limitations before I dive head first in? I have no idea if the app even works in this configuration with the x64 emulation, etc... so I'd like to know, but 3k is a lot to spend and have it flop.

Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1426760-test-windows-11-arm-on-x86/
Share on other sites

On 11/03/2023 at 07:02, scumdogmillionaire said:

Hello! Is there a way to test Windows 11 ARM on x86? I am thinking of switching from PC to Mac m2 with Parallels running Windows 11. I maintain a .NET Framework Winforms app that requires x86 and that's the only thing that really prevents me from just switching to macOS full time.

Is there a way to test the ARM version and it's limitations before I dive head first in? I have no idea if the app even works in this configuration with the x64 emulation, etc... so I'd like to know, but 3k is a lot to spend and have it flop.

Thanks!

Can your application run on 4.8.1? If so, it should be fine.

If not, then it may still work fine, but it will have to use emulated x64 .NET Framework which will make it slower.

If you are using anything before .NET 6 (maybe 5 too), you can pretty much forget about that working, at least in my experience. It wouldn't even install.

  • Like 1

Yeah, luckily I keep up with .NET Framework on it. It's currently on 4.7.2. I can look at updating it to 4.8.1, I didn't really know that was a marker for it, so I will certainly look into that. Visual Studio doesn't even load up 4.8 by default, so I never bothered with that move so my installer wouldn't have to deal with it.

Thank you for the insight!

On 11/03/2023 at 08:51, scumdogmillionaire said:

Yeah, luckily I keep up with .NET Framework on it. It's currently on 4.7.2. I can look at updating it to 4.8.1, I didn't really know that was a marker for it, so I will certainly look into that. Visual Studio doesn't even load up 4.8 by default, so I never bothered with that move so my installer wouldn't have to deal with it.

Thank you for the insight!

Yeah 4.8.1 came out specifically for Windows on ARM and Visual Studio. They are working pretty hard to get feature parity with the x64 version of VS. The newest preview build adds in Maui support.

I've been running projects that were built on 4.5 and 4.8.1 has been ok to run them under as long as I reinstalled the NuGet packages.  Coherence mode is top notch too. People scratch their heads when they see Visual Studio 2022 in the dock.

On 11/03/2023 at 10:57, adrynalyne said:

Yeah 4.8.1 came out specifically for Windows on ARM and Visual Studio. They are working pretty hard to get feature parity with the x64 version of VS. The newest preview build adds in Maui support.

I've been running projects that were built on 4.5 and 4.8.1 has been ok to run them under as long as I reinstalled the NuGet packages.  Coherence mode is top notch too. People scratch their heads when they see Visual Studio 2022 in the dock.

That's great to hear.

So what if you rely on a package or component that is on Framework 2.0 or something?  Is that still fine, just as long as host app is still on 4.8.1?

EDIT: Ah crap, I just realized SQL Server Express which I install with the app won't work. I could find work arounds for development, but to actually test my installer even I'm going to need an actual Windows PC somewhere. Boo.

On 11/03/2023 at 09:05, scumdogmillionaire said:

That's great to hear.

So what if you rely on a package or component that is on Framework 2.0 or something?  Is that still fine, just as long as host app is still on 4.8.1?

EDIT: Ah crap, I just realized SQL Server Express which I install with the app won't work. I could find work arounds for development, but to actually test my installer even I'm going to need an actual Windows PC somewhere. Boo.

Framework 3.5 and older are on a different code base than 4.x so no, there is very little chance of those working.

For Sql Server,  my workaround was to use Docker in macOS and create a container using the amd64 version of the image. It allows you to go all the way back to SQL Server 2017. The ARM image out there is some weird edge version. I don't know if SQL server express is available in Docker though. I use the developer version of SQL server.

 

  • Like 1

Yeah, I don't care so much about this working from an end user side, but I'd like to be able to have one computer that I use daily rather than two. Guess it's never gonna happen until I no longer have to maintain this app. My next thought was Azure Dev Box, but that's stupid expensive AND i have a hardware code signing key, so I have to deal with that myself. Frustrating. Stopped at every corner haha.

On 11/03/2023 at 09:33, scumdogmillionaire said:

Yeah, I don't care so much about this working from an end user side, but I'd like to be able to have one computer that I use daily rather than two. Guess it's never gonna happen until I no longer have to maintain this app. My next thought was Azure Dev Box, but that's stupid expensive AND i have a hardware code signing key, so I have to deal with that myself. Frustrating. Stopped at every corner haha.

Yeah, from what you have described, Parallels should be fine and actually, at least for me, it works incredibly well.

If you want details on the Docker setup, let me know. Its as simple as installing Docker on macOS and running docker run with some options, but I can give you all that. Then its as simple as using SSMS or whatever, just like before.

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...

One thing you could try is setting up a virtual machine on your current PC and installing Windows 11 ARM on it. This way, you can test out your .NET Framework Winforms app and see if it works with x64 emulation. It's not a perfect test, but it could give you an idea of what to expect. As for your concern about spending a lot of money on a new Mac and having it flop, I totally get it.

On 06/04/2023 at 01:52, ogbonnayauche said:

One thing you could try is setting up a virtual machine on your current PC and installing Windows 11 ARM on it. This way, you can test out your .NET Framework Winforms app and see if it works with x64 emulation. It's not a perfect test, but it could give you an idea of what to expect. As for your concern about spending a lot of money on a new Mac and having it flop, I totally get it.

How would you go about that, being its a different architecture? Seems like an emulator would be needed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
    • Yes, I actually glossed over the Linux part from the OP. You could always go for a 9070 XT and if you really want to play Ray Traced games in the future, GeForce Now is pretty damn good on Linux https://www.neowin.net/news/nvidias-native-geforce-now-app-for-linux-bridges-the-gaming-gap-hands-on/
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!