Storing Library files on Secondary Drive versus M.2 NVMe SSD


Recommended Posts

True or False

 

is it bad idea to store my Windows Library files on Secondary 4TB Storage Drive?       Have 500GB NvMe Boot SSD with Windows installed on it, and ever since i first got my First 250GB SSD i always make sure to manually move Documents, Pictures, Videos, Music, Desktop folders to My storage drive to limit writes to the NvMe M.2 or Sata SSDs in my Systems.      Extremely not sure if and when i do a Windows 11 Clean install of leaving those folders as default as i know i'll be worrying on writes constantly lol, even though i probably shouldn't, but just way i am with my old school self

 

Games are Installed on Seperate SSD  Samsung 860 Evo 1TB

Strictly Games on that one

 

Here is current Crystal disk info for all the drives

 

 

4TB Storage Drive CrystalDisk info.png

M.2 Boot NvMe Crystaldiskinfo.png

ohhh guess i am very old school in that regard then, as i always thought it was necessary thing to do all these years

Since i got my FIrst SSD Drive in 2016

 

Yeah I wouldn't worry about a modern SSD wearing out.

But I've always had a separate boot drive and data drive in a desktop just to make re-installs easier.

I can wipe the boot drive and all my files are exactly where I left them!

😛

yeah I've had Data always on usually a Hard Drive over the years.  and Boot drive only Windows and Some Small Applications personally over the years.     

But i guess i'll slowly stop worrying, as someday i may have an All SSD Computer for the first time.    Always been a worrier and panicer lol on various things over the years

 

 

Hello,

I believe Microsoft's official recommendation is to keep everything on the C:\ drive partition these days, however, like @Michael Scrip and you, @bikeman25, I like to keep my data on a separate partition.  Aside from making it slight more portable, it also allows me to quickly backup or synchronize my data.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

  • Like 1

Echoing what is said above, I store my OS on a smaller faster M.2 and then all my library (games, media) on a second larger drive.  In my current use case, it is another M.2, but hasn't always been.  I know there's no prescribed "need" for this, but it suits my workflow when wiping the OS or porting to a new install.

  • Like 2

My Dream motherboard  (ASUS Z590-PLUS TUF Gaming WiFi Intel LGA 1200 ATX Motherboard - Micro Center)   if i knew how to install components on newer boards like Processor, CPU Coolers,  i'd probably  buy it and get it all setup, and have my dream machine with more M.2 Slots--then my Main OS Drive would be Current M.2, and 2nd one would be for Libraries and Media,     and 4tB WD Black would probably turn into for maybe VIdeo File storage perhaps i suppose.   

But since i'm stuck with Gigabyte B460M-DS3H motherboard just will be happy with my 1 M.2 and current setup as it is, and enjoy my build to best of my ability--as its best i can do at the moment.     And ignore other comments on reddit that say i'm sacrificing performance way my build is setup and wearing out 4TB drive faster than if i stored my media files on C M.2 drive.   

Thank you all for the replies and putting me at ease for future when i do eventually get 2 M.2 drives or replace this 4TB with a Sata SSD that is always possible in the future if i don't manage to get motherboard upgraded at some point in way future.

 

 

At my peak, I had 2 disks in Raid 1 for the OS, 3 in RAID5 for my data, and 4 in RAID 10 for my applications. This was at one point done for performance reasons due to the short comings of mechanical disks and the price/capacity ratio of SSDs. (Hell back in my day, we didn't have SSDs!) Now days, SSDs are so cheap and fast that I just purchase 2TB m.2 ssds and store my OS and application data on the same disk. All of my files have moved to a DFS server running in my homelab that lives on a 24 disk 200TB SAN in RAID6. :)In business environments, I have seen SSDs fail, however I have not had one personally fail on me. Since I have servers that backup to the cloud using Veeam, I treat my workstations like cattle - disposable dumb clients. If they take the ######, re image them and I'm back up and running in a couple of hours. I wouldn't worry too much about SSDs failing - but DO have good backups of your personal data. You can re-download all the other crap and write scripts to get things tweaked the way you like them.

Yeah i only have not too much written to my M.2 Nvme SSD Currently.    i always backup my data every week incremental, and  Full backup at end of each month, or sometimes before a Windows Update

 

 

 

NvMe Status.png

  • 1 month later...

Did a Clean Windows 11 Pro x64bit install  yesterday, left Library folders as default for now,  still a tiny bit nervous on Writes to The M.2 NvMe SSD,  but a little less than i was before, but no longer i suppose doing all i can to avoid writes to the drive as much as i possibly could in the past

just hopefully it lasts as long time, as since upgraded to Tower style CPU Cooler harder to get to than when i was using Intel LGA 1200 Stock cooler on my Intel 10700

Previously all User folders was on Mechanical hard drive E 4TB WD Black,  even Onedrive (which that still is stored there was too nervous to leave that as default on NvMe SSD Drive

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I sort of agree with you on that. I had a telescope - a real hefty thing, although only around 500CHF - that got me so fascinated about the stars and planets. I would stare for hours, amazed that I could see the craters of the moon or the rings of Saturn in "realtime" (quotations because, y'know, speed of light and whatnot). A friend of mine has a telescope like the one mentioned in the review, and the pictures are amazing to look at. But there is something missing for me. I may as well just go to NASA's website and look through their gallery.
    • As opposed to catching bad press because it's the engine's fault? The engine has all the tools a dev needs to optimize their game, Epic isn't gonna hold their hand to make sure they use them. Also, Epic isn't forcing anyone to use Lumen, Nanite or super high resolution meshes and textures. Just because Nanite can render meshes with millions of polygons doesn't mean you should use it like that, in fact, Epic recommends you avoid doing that. Most of the stuttering can easily be fixed by cutting down on unique shaders by using master materials and generating a PSO cache and compiling every shader before loading the game and also managing what must be loaded and unloaded at runtime, it's up to the developer to set all that up properly.
    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!