Empty NTFS partitions on my SDD; what's the use?


Recommended Posts

After I cloned my SSD I see that there are empty, non drive-letters, partitions on muy SSD.

What's the use of this? Can they be safely deleted? [for space-sake they can remain, because this drive has lots of free space].

Just wondering...

image.png

image.png

First partition should be for boot. I see it all the time with Linux systems.

Why they are "fragmented" like that, not sure.. Maybe they use it for storing system data? IDK..

Technically your EFI Partition should only be 100MB (the very first one), and shouldn't have any gap between that and the Windows partition, the recovery partition (the last one) can vary but is generally around 600MB.

  On 26/03/2023 at 04:48, Matthew S. said:

Technically your EFI Partition should only be 100MB (the very first one), and shouldn't have any gap between that and the Windows partition, the recovery partition (the last one) can vary but is generally around 600MB.

Expand  

Unless t's an OEM install then it's not uncommon to see a Schmorgan's board of partitions.

Can't really do anything with the "Other" 16MB.  Assuming it's a MSR partition.

If you're worried about any possible data in the 837 and 650mb ... you should be able to just assign them drive letters and take a look inside.  Afterwards, you should be able to safely delete them causing them to become unallocated ... and extend the partitions of C and Z.  ¯\_ (ツ)_/¯

Does that 500+ GB partition have a drive letter...assuming it does?  What's up with the two smaller T and Z partitions?  Man, that's just a messy looking drive layout.

 

  On 26/03/2023 at 04:48, Matthew S. said:

Technically your EFI Partition should only be 100MB (the very first one), and shouldn't have any gap between that and the Windows partition, the recovery partition (the last one) can vary but is generally around 600MB.

Expand  

It's probably one of the ASUS notebooks in his sig block.  My Dell notebook has a 650 EFI partition ... my ASUS notebook is 345mb.  My home built desktop is 100.

  On 26/03/2023 at 11:06, Warwagon said:

Unless t's an OEM install then it's not uncommon to see a Schmorgan's board of partitions.

Expand  

True, I did forget about OEM bloat.  Having only ever owned one Windows-based laptop which was well before UEFI...

  On 26/03/2023 at 11:08, Jim K said:

Man, that's just a messy looking drive layout.

Expand  

Agreed ;) what is odd they don't look to be recovery partitions.. Even when you install windows native on the drive - shouldn't there be the recovery partition for say windows 10.. Those wouldn't show up as ntfs partitions..

That  looks to be self inflicted - or redoing maybe the recovery partitions that an OEM might do..

 

 

  On 26/03/2023 at 13:06, BudMan said:

Agreed ;) what is odd they don't look to be recovery partitions.. Even when you install windows native on the drive - shouldn't there be the recovery partition for say windows 10.. Those wouldn't show up as ntfs partitions..

That  looks to be self inflicted - or redoing maybe the recovery partitions that an OEM might do..

 

 

Expand  

It were recovery drives.

However, I put Win 11 Pro on it [with a purchased key], so I don't really need the Asus recovery anymore... drivers and software can be downloaded based on the model.

I rearranged the layout. And everything's working fine. 

The G: General is 'spare GB's' put on other drive :laugh:

Is this better drive layout-speaking?!

image.png

Even if you install windows 10/11 clean there should be a recovery partition.. This allows you to "reset" etc..

Not saying you have to have that - you could always do a clean install again if things go sideways.. But then again its not so large of amount of space that it should matter..  And pretty sure it contains recovery tools that could be used in the fixing of issues.. etc.

I don't see the point of like that G drive, why not just make it all just your OS drive?  I don't see the point of your temp and swap partitions either - do you ever even use swap?

Partitioning your drives like that make more sense in a multi user setup where you don't want some user using your whole disk with their stuff and killing the space the OS has for its use, etc.   In a single user machine they don't have as much use, and limit your use of possible space, etc.

 

 

 

  On 26/03/2023 at 17:32, BudMan said:

Even if you install windows 10/11 clean there should be a recovery partition.. This allows you to "reset" etc..

Not saying you have to have that - you could always do a clean install again if things go sideways.. But then again its not so large of amount of space that it should matter..  And pretty sure it contains recovery tools that could be used in the fixing of issues.. etc.

I don't see the point of like that G drive, why not just make it all just your OS drive?  I don't see the point of your temp and swap partitions either - do you ever even use swap?

Partitioning your drives like that make more sense in a multi user setup where you don't want some user using your whole disk with their stuff and killing the space the OS has for its use, etc.   In a single user machine they don't have as much use, and limit your use of possible space, etc.

 

 

 

Expand  

This is from a clean install disk [other computer]. I don't see any 'reset' partition...

Ah well.. when your computer's not working as is should, better to clean install anyhow.

image.png

  On 26/03/2023 at 17:32, BudMan said:

Even if you install windows 10/11 clean there should be a recovery partition.. This allows you to "reset" etc..

Expand  

Yeah, don't get rid of that. I have learned the hard way. I decided to reset the laptop and it went, "oops something went wrong." Because cleverclogs that I am thought, "meh, I'm never going to need that option." So I had to reinstall the whole Windows partition again. Ultimately it was going to be the same process, but I did have to make sure my documents and such were backed up to their latest version before I went ahead.

 

  On 26/03/2023 at 17:32, BudMan said:

 don't see the point of like that G drive, why not just make it all just your OS drive?  I don't see the point of your temp and swap partitions either - do you ever even use swap?

Partitioning your drives like that make more sense in a multi user setup where you don't want some user using your whole disk with their stuff and killing the space the OS has for its use, etc.   In a single user machine they don't have as much use, and limit your use of possible space, etc.

Expand  

I would argue that if you are dual-booting or trying to access information from one OS to another over a network you might want a common filesystem area that both systems could access, but I agree that there are easier solutions.

  On 26/03/2023 at 18:18, Nick H. said:

dual-booting or trying to access information from one OS to another over a network

Expand  

While I agree with dual-boot, but does anyone even do that any more.. Back in the day sure I could boot multiple OSes - but now just run a VM, or for my linux fix just run it on a pi, or of late I have just been using wsl in windows..   Also use cygwin etc..   I just don't see the need to partition a disk like being done, other than like uefi or some sort of recovery partition, etc.  For my storage/os needs I would just use 1 partition.. 

But over a network - makes no difference what the file system is.. As long as the server that is sharing it can access it, for example my nas disks are btrfs - windows sure doesn't understand that filesystem ;)

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • PC manufacturers used to trick BIOS copyright strings to get full editions of trial software by Usama Jawad You may have noticed that when you purchase a new PC, it comes with certain software pre-installed. Sometimes, when you open this software, it activates, and you receive the full version of it without paying any additional cost. This is because that PC's manufacturer is a licensee of that software and the fact that a customer gets the full version of a trial software for free serves as a perk for potential buyers. However, many PC manufacturers tried to trick this process in its infancy. During the days of Windows 95, when the Plug and Play specification was still in development, the OS' engineering team was trying to figure out ways through which it could identify PCs that existed prior to the inception of this specification. To that end, one of the methods they tried was searching for copyright strings and firmware dates in the BIOS. Through the course of this investigation, they discovered a rather oddly named copyright string "Not Copyright Fabrikam Computer" in a PC that was actually manufactured by Contoso. In this case, both Fabrikam and Contoso are fictional names that are used to describe this scenario without revealing the actual identity of the OEMs involved. Microsoft engineer Raymond Chen explains in a blog post that these odd copyright strings were actually appearing because Contoso PCs contained a trial version of a software and the company wanted the full version to be activated for customers even though it was not an official licensee. In order to bypass the costly licensing process, what the firm did was that it added the following text to its copyright string: "Copyright Contoso Not Copyright Fabrikam Computer". The trial version of said software would search for the string "Copyright Fabrikam Computer" and end up finding it within the substring of the convoluted copyright string mentioned above, accidentally activating the software's full version. While more robust ways were adopted later to avoid this problem, it's certainly interesting to see that OEMs would go to this length in order to distribute software that they are not officially allowed to. Well, as they say, the past stays in the past.
    • Uhm... a couple of issues with this. First, you're engaging in revisionist history. People weren't dragged from Win 7 to Win 10. You've kind of glossed over a whole cycle there: Win 8/8.1. People stayed on 7 because they hated 8/8.1 and held on until 10 showed up. THEN they actually started to switch voluntarily. Second, it's not about the OS, it's about the workflow. OS fans consistently miss this. People have work to do and they've invested a lot of time, effort and even money building their workflows. It's expensive to change so, that change has to offer real benefits that compensate for the cost of updating workflow and sorry, Win 11 just doesn't. That's the same reason they won't just jump to an entirely new OS - which has an even bigger workflow cost - until there's just no other option. Not only is there the core workflow cost, but the cost of finding new parallel software for the new OS, transferring and possible converting files and dealing with incompatibilities and then redeveloping workflows. It's just not as simple as "switch". And now there IS another option, stay on Win 10 for another year and pray for Win 12 (much as Win 7 users did with Win 8 - which happened when Win 10 came out).
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      DrRonSr earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Sharon dixon earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Parallax Abstraction earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      956400 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidfegan earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      616
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      227
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      170
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      166
    5. 5
      Som
      148
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!