• 0

ESET Internet Security: The ESET LiveGrid® servers cannot be reached


Question

On two computer with ESET Internet Security installed (v 16.1.14.0) I get the  message: The ESET LiveGrid® servers cannot be reached.

Some time stamps [it's mostly on computer 1] - derived from my eset.com account its Activity feed:

Computer 1:
6:00 PM, 05/11/2023
The ESET LiveGrid® servers cannot be reached
7:42 PM, 05/10/2023
4:10 PM, 05/04/2023
1:00 PM, 05/02/2023
9:22 AM, 05/02/2023
8:06 PM, 04/25/2023

Computer 2:
12:05 PM, 05/02/2023
The ESET LiveGrid® servers cannot be reached
10:47 AM, 05/02/2023

What can be the issue here? Is a reinstall an option, or is this ESET related?

14 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I get the live grid not working as well. It's all to do with server addresses not being reached. I ignore it, it works anyway and can be reached eventually. Does not seem to effect the program working. I think it's the ISP.

  • 0

As @NinjaGingeralso mentions, I get this when first booting up and my VPN is taking a moment to connect. I ignore it for 5 minutes, and the problem solves itself.

But maybe our resident guru, @goretskycould offer some tips?

  • 0
On 11/05/2023 at 21:07, Nick H. said:

As @NinjaGingeralso mentions, I get this when first booting up and my VPN is taking a moment to connect. I ignore it for 5 minutes, and the problem solves itself.

But maybe our resident guru, @goretskycould offer some tips?

Strange I can't read the users in your post they're completely white, forum bug? 

  • 0
On 12/05/2023 at 04:55, kiddingguy said:

It's not only when booting up.

Sometimes also after waking up/idle/hibernate.

A reboot though fixed the problem, but that's just a temp solution.

Hi !

I used to have the same issue with ESET, even one of their technicians who took over my computer was never able to fix this annoying problem. He simply stopped troubleshooting and told me it was an application incompatibility, and closed the incident! just like that 😲!

That's why I ditched ESET!

 

  • 0

Hello,

From looking at https://status.eset.com/, it looks like there were issues with ESET's cloud between May 11 12:19 UTC and May 12 13:00 UTC.

The issue with connectivity after a hibernate/sleep/low power state sounds unrelated.  As a complete guess, it sounds like the software isn't detecting or getting the link state info refreshed from the network stack, but, again, that's a complete guess on my part.  I will ask a friend I know over there who's on the core architecture team (which may not be the right person, but it's a starting point), but you may also want to ask in their support forum—the support engineers there  are senior ones who work for ESET's headquarters.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky


 

  • 0
On 12/05/2023 at 07:03, goretsky said:

From looking at https://status.eset.com/, it looks like there were issues with ESET's cloud between May 11 12:19 UTC and May 12 13:00 UTC.

Hi!

I encountered this problem long before the period you mention, the problem appeared following an update of the app.

Now I'm using another antivirus, and there is no problem of connection with the database of this one, and no incompatibility with another application. The problem was ESET!

With the experience I had with the support, I will never recommend this security suite. The service completely sucks!

  • 0

Hello,

@snowy owl, I was replying to the person who was having the issue, but thanks for sharing.  I am glad you found something that meets your needs.



@kiddingguy, if you are consistently able to reproduce the problem, ESET's support folks can help you troubleshoot it.  There's are all sorts of detailed logging options for troubleshooting under Advanced setup [F5 key] → Tools → Diagnostics → Advanced Logging, but you would want to speak with a support engineer first to determine what sort of information needs to be captured.

 

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

  • 0
On 14/05/2023 at 01:04, goretsky said:

I am glad you found something that meets your needs.

Hi,

Indeed, I went back to Kaspersky, which hasn't given me all these problems that I had encountered with ESET.

I also mention the experience I had with one of their technicians who had passed on the incident to a higher level technician. To whom I had sent all the diagnostics of the app, only to be told that there must be some incompatibility with another application, but he could not tell me which one! And with a snap of the finger he closed the request, and then I was on my own. So I can't give any good feedback about them.

Earlier I mentioned that this problem had started after an update of the app, to be more precise, this problem had started around the middle of November 2022, and was happening every day, and then, sometimes the connection ended up being restored the same day or sometimes only the next day.

Good continuation, I will not interfere in your subject anymore.

Have a nice day

Best regards

Edited by snowy owl
misspelling
  • 0

@goretsky

Hi Aryeh,

Just came to my attention about your distinguished career in the AV industry, going back to working with John McAfee at his kitchen table!
John would've been an interesting guy to work with. "If I suicide myself, I didn't. I was whackd." and yet his cause of death is reported as a hanging. 
Was an intriguing story, no doubt.

  • 0

Hello,

Mr. McAfee was certainly an interesting individual; he had an amazing ability to synthesize information from many disparate sources at once and then make a decision.  In retrospect, some of them were wrong, but often they were correct.  He also had an ability to rapidly pivot if something wasn't working out.  These were definitely important skills that allowed him to flourish.

That said, he had grown accustomed to having his way and getting whatever he wanted in the years since he had made his fortune, and was very proud of the control he had over everything around him.  Being jailed and fighting extradition meant having all of that all taken away from him.  At his final extradition you could hear the stress in his voice--he clearly was dreading what was to come next.  I think that what he did was simply his final way of exerting some control over his life.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      561
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!