Recommended Posts

Just a question... what's easier in usage for better password management? And nowadays most common, and workable? [also when passwords/keys are not stored ny acciddent and/or forgotten]

Passkeys 2FA (with apps like Google/Microsoft Authenticator) or a Password Manager (e.g. LastPass, Dashlane, KeePass or alike). Or a combination between one of these [or alternatives, such as 2FA with a password manager.

And can this also be configured on OS-level (Windows in this case). I do have a fingerprint reader, and is thi sufficient, or is there third party tooling needed to get it working.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1430196-passkey-vs-2fa-vs-password-manager/
Share on other sites

In short... I use a password manager with just a password (totally offline which is more secure than password managers that store stuff online) and on Google I use YubiKey. I avoid 2FA that uses smart phones since I don't like using smart phones for anything besides looking something up online real quick. but when I am online in general (like doing anything besides looking up something real quick) I am pretty much always on a proper computer (desktop).

 

-For general password management... a typical password manager is all you need (pwsafe.org in my case which I have been using since about the late 2000's as it works on Windows/Linux etc and it's totally offline so you don't put your trust in a company that could get hacked and your password database exposed). note: if you think you may forget your password, I suggest writing it down on a piece of paper and storing it in a secure location. this way even if you forgot, you are covered and the risk of someone getting a hold of it from writing it down somewhere should be minimal if you put it in a location people generally ain't going to have access to it.

-For signing into a limited amount of websites that support it... I use a YubiKey (this is optimal, but since it's not free I can easily understand why many won't use it especially since you need two of them at minimum and I would not be a fan of this method unless you can get them cheap enough, say $40 tops. I got mine at a decent discount a while ago as I think it was somewhere around $30 for two of them. but I think the last I checked, off the top of my head, it's probably more around $50 for two nowadays, possibly less if you can get a discount). I have never been a fan of authenticator programs etc. I avoid smart phones for doing stuff online (especially anything beyond looking up something quick) as a general rule. so anything that requires these, I just outright don't use it.

but personally I think using 2FA on a password manager is more trouble than it's worth. because the way I see it, if your computer became compromised it probably ain't going to be difficult for that shady person to get a hold of your passwords etc at that point. so the key is... make sure your devices stay virus free and you are secure enough with a typical password manager with a password on it.

Thx. So no “real” need for passkey with password manager?

Password manager & 2FA if/when applicable can be sufficient.

Like I said, I have a fingerprint reader to log into Windows (and to use as biometric unlock on Dashlane).
Plus Google/MS Authenticator for certain (gaming) apps.

For most of my 2FA and Password managing, i use 1Password. Simply because i am able to incorporate my 2FA codes as well as my login details all in one app. You do have to pay a subscription for it, but i think its 100% worth it as you can incorporate anything in it. 

I use MS Authenticator for my 365 logins, but the rest i have within 1Password. 

  • Like 2

I use Bitwarden and always use 2FA when I can.  It copies the 2fa code to the clipboard so you can paste it right in after filling in credentials.  It's the easiest form of 2FA I find.  No need to pick up another device.  

If you are in security like me and hate that habbit (saves me time), 2FA on a secondary device like Raivo on iOS or w/e is on Android.  Technically it's better to do this to prevent things like malware getting both from your BW addin/memory if it gets onto your system.  

Yubikey is also good, highly recommend Yubikey Bio + having a backup stored somewhere offsite.  Recommend keeping an encrypted backup of your passwords as well like having a quick process to export from bitwarden into a keepass vault so that if BW is down you I quickly get up and running with a recent backup.  

  • 4 weeks later...
On 12/06/2023 at 13:59, MJay said:

For most of my 2FA and Password managing, i use 1Password. Simply because i am able to incorporate my 2FA codes as well as my login details all in one app. You do have to pay a subscription for it, but i think its 100% worth it as you can incorporate anything in it. 

I use MS Authenticator for my 365 logins, but the rest i have within 1Password. 

Login details (username/password) and 2FA are seperate by design for security. By tying both together under one service defeats the point, and to me, is insecure.

On 07/07/2023 at 22:08, SouthGate said:

Login details (username/password) and 2FA are seperate by design for security. By tying both together under one service defeats the point, and to me, is insecure.

You're not wrong, but I'll offer a counterpoint--

Think of it like a "good/better/best".  It's good to have 2fa stored in the same password manager than it is to not have 2fa at all.  It's better to have it in a separate product, and best to have that product be biometric and hardware-separate to your electronics (like Yubikey).  Security is always a scale of ease-of-use to risk acceptance, so it's hard to advocate "better" or "best" security when the risk is low, but it's still best practice.

There are contexts where even having 2fa within the same password manager will legitimately help you -- for example when a password is compromised - which does happen all the time - simply having the 2fa in place is a level of protection.  That's what we're really talking about here -- not that 1password is compromised in and of itself, but that your password to Joe's Pizza Shack is compromised because Joe's Pizza Shack has cruddy security.  2FA will prevent the use of your account; it doesn't matter where that 2fa "lives".

So I'd still advocate 2fa within a product like 1password if someone has no 2fa at all.  There's room to grow after that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think I understood the article fine. Online password managers open users up to more possibilities of getting hacked, and due to KeePass being offline and local it reduces the idea of getting hacked. If someone chooses to put their database online they're kinda missing the point. With regards to the idea of the on-prem idea, I would have two issues. I'm not sure about the first issue, but I wouldn't be surprised about them offering a cloud storage for the passwords that most wouldn't bother to switch off, regardless of if they went for on-prem or not. The second issue is that the on-prem solution for Bitwarden costs money, whereas KeePass is free and open-source (as far as I am aware). The article points out how to sync the database between devices, and I recognise that deficiency in security. But it isn't a necessity. So both services can offer a same idea, but one is free and the other isn't...choices, choices.... But to each their own.
    • AB Download Manager 1.9.2 by Razvan Serea AB Download Manager is an open-source, feature-rich download manager designed to accelerate downloads, organize files efficiently, and provide seamless control over downloads. With support for multiple connections, resume capability, and an intuitive interface, it enhances the downloading experience for users seeking speed and reliability. The software integrates with various browsers, enabling quick link grabbing and batch downloading. It supports HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP protocols, ensuring broad compatibility with different file sources. Users can schedule downloads, set speed limits, and categorize files automatically for better organization. AB Download Manager is lightweight yet powerful, making it a great alternative to proprietary download managers. Its open-source nature allows developers to contribute, customize, and improve the software as needed. Whether you're downloading large files, managing multiple downloads at once, or seeking an ad-free experience, this tool offers a practical and efficient solution. Key features of AB Download Manager: Multi-Connection Support – Accelerates downloads by splitting files into multiple segments. Resume Capability – Allows paused or interrupted downloads to be resumed without starting over. Batch Downloading – Supports downloading multiple files at once for improved efficiency. Browser Integration – Captures download links directly from browsers for seamless operation. HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP Support – Ensures compatibility with a wide range of file sources. Download Scheduling – Enables users to automate downloads at specific times. Speed Limiting – Lets users control bandwidth usage for optimized performance. File Categorization – Automatically organizes downloaded files into designated folders. User-Friendly Interface – Simple and intuitive design for easy navigation. Cross-Platform Compatibility – Works on multiple operating systems. Ad-Free Experience – No intrusive ads or tracking for a clean user experience. AB Download Manager 1.9.2 changelog: Added New Twilight theme (#1292) Optional download completion notifications on Android (#1290) Fixed Fixed a crash on some older CPUs on Windows Fixed oversized system tray icon on macOS Improved Updated translations Prevented Android devices from sleeping while downloads are active (#1291) Various UI and UX improvements Download: AB Download Manager 1.9.2 | Portable | ~80.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 | Android Links: AB Download Manager Website | Github Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I am not surprised because life is the product of a lot of biochemical and physical processes that releases various energies as a by-product. The only thing new here is the detection of these photon emissions. The researches noted this "glow" is not a metaphysical one. They don't even immediately end when one is dead. Things like fires, light bulbs, and on a bigger scale stars release a lot more "light" and they are hardly alive.
    • Did you not understand the concern of the article and/or what on-prem means?
    • If there rumours are true zen 7 will be am5 too
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!