• 0

Your Favorite Music Player?


Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

With Spotify I haven't really needed another music player. With that said, for those times where I do need a music player I use Dopamine. It does everything I need, is available for Windows, Linux and Mac, and because it is being developed by @Raphaël G.I feel like any issues or suggestions get heard and addressed.

  • Like 3
  • 0

I have been using MediaMonkey for a long time now. There is a paid version and a free version. The free version has so many features I feel I don't need to pay for the full version. There is a version of MM for Android and it is only $5. Not sure about iOS.

The app displays album cover artwork, artist artwork, and shows quite a bit of info about the artist. It also looks up lyrics. There are options to: backup the library, rebuild full text search, optimize the database and rebuild the database. You can print custom "reports" to html or .csv formats. You can also export your playlists.

I don't see how they can provide an app with the extensive features it has for free.MMLyrics.jpg.43082b271316032f99788a7f7d6204a7.jpg

MM Music Screen.jpg

MM Ten Years After Info.jpg

  • 0

Foobar2000 ; it's been around since Dec 2002 and is still actively developed.

it does not have a fancy looking interface but in terms of practical function you can't beat it (you can create tabs etc and I just drag-and-drop music files into it etc) as it does the basics well which is play music and you can also convert from lossless (FLAC etc) to lossy (MP3/AAC/Opus etc) files easily enough once it's setup properly as I use the, 'right click > Convert' menu and setup some presets there.

if you plan on doing any conversion I suggest installing the 'Encoder Pack' (i.e. https://www.foobar2000.org/encoderpack ). you can even make Apple AAC (AAC-LC (which is standard AAC files)) with it to but it requires more than just installing that Encoder Pack, which I won't get into for now. besides I would just use MP3 anyways since that's pretty much universally supported on anything that plays lossy files and if you need another format besides MP3 I would consider Opus since you can get pretty good all-around sound at 64kbps where as with MP3 I generally suggest using no lower than V5 (130kbps average) and AAC (Apple AAC) I would avoid going lower than 96kbps.

you can even convert "HD" FLAC files (96/24 etc) back to standard 44.1/16 once you install the 'SoX' plugin (i.e. https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,67376.msg1014620.html#msg1014620 ; this is needed for the 64-bit version of Foobar2000. if you are using the 32-bit (which has been standard in Foobar2000 for a long time until fairly recently) you can still use the one from years ago on the first post of page one of that topic). I always stick to standard 44.1/16 (i.e. standard AUDIO CD) since the file size is smaller and is more standardized and you can't improve on standard audio CD sound anyways since it already exceeds human hearing ability so there is no point in having "HD" audio.

p.s. I use Foobar2000, which is Windows software, on Linux through Wine (I setup a wine profile just for Foobar2000 through PlayOnLinux). it's hands down better than any native Linux music playback/conversion program.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So its a museum of AI prompts? Boring
    • This one baffles me...so they are creating a museum based around the Ship of Theseus? A museum is supposed to preserve things. It doesn't really work if the conversation goes, "I gazed upon Starry Night the other day, the colours were beautiful!" "Yeah...I didn't expect Godzilla to show up, though." Create a building devoted to displaying AI work, fine. The rainforest idea sounds interesting and I would consider visiting if they pay me a few bucks. But don't call it a museum...
    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!