• 0

Chromium project... what's it about?


Question

Referring to this thread/news 

Just a question... what's Chromium all about? It's an open-source project, as I understand? Because I also read that Google has the majority (of stakes) in it, and thus not really 'independent' (yet open source).

And organizations can play/fork with it, have features removed, or added etc. Right?

What's the big issue/controversy on tracking/advertising/advertisers etc in this source code? Especially if it can be disabled and/or removed. But than again... by which party? And which one is reliable and compatible enough with the interwebs?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1431919-chromium-project-whats-it-about/
Share on other sites

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

the Blink engine in Chromium is far superior to Mozilla's Gecko engine IMO and that's one of the main reasons it took off so much initially. Chrome was also the first to go full multi-process so web pages wouldn't bog down the UI.

These days though Gecko (and now Quantum by extension) have narrowed that gap. 

It really was a push pull situation that lead to currently popularity, Chrome gained popularity early on due to its solid engine and early HTML5 adaptions while Firefox was losing popularity due to still being single processed and they kept changing up their UI just because.

  • Like 2
  • 0
On 01/08/2023 at 16:40, Brandon H said:

the Blink engine in Chromium is far superior to Mozilla's Gecko engine IMO and that's one of the main reasons it took off so much initially. Chrome was also the first to go full multi-process so web pages wouldn't bog down the UI.

These days though Gecko (and now Quantum by extension) have narrowed that gap. 

It really was a push pull situation that lead to currently popularity, Chrome gained popularity early on due to its solid engine and early HTML5 adaptions while Firefox was losing popularity due to still being single processed and they kept changing up their UI just because.

On Wikipedia I read: :" Blink is a fork of the WebCore component of WebKit, which was originally a fork of the KHTML and KJS libraries from KDE. It is used in Chrome starting at version 28, Microsoft Edge starting at version 79, Opera (15+), Vivaldi, Brave, Amazon Silk and other Chromium-based browsers and frameworks."

So, if "Google/Chrome is evil" :devil: are the other mentioned browsers "more safe" to use to not have all this advertising bs involved?

  • 0
On 01/08/2023 at 09:49, kiddingguy said:

On Wikipedia I read: :" Blink is a fork of the WebCore component of WebKit, which was originally a fork of the KHTML and KJS libraries from KDE. It is used in Chrome starting at version 28, Microsoft Edge starting at version 79, Opera (15+), Vivaldi, Brave, Amazon Silk and other Chromium-based browsers and frameworks."

Yes, Blink is indeed a fork of WebKit. Chrome originally was on WebKit when it first released before they eventually forked it.

WebKit was always superior to Gecko IMO just from a web developer standpoint. These days though WebKit has gotten pretty stagnated because it's just Apple utilizing it now in Safari.

 

On 01/08/2023 at 09:49, kiddingguy said:

So, if "Google/Chrome is evil" :devil: are the other mentioned browsers "more safe" to use to not have all this advertising bs involved?

Stick with the Chromium forks like Brave and the like and you'll be fine, most of them strip out the majority of Google's stuff already anyway. The forkers mostly just want the engine and access to the existing extension library.

  • 0
On 01/08/2023 at 16:56, Brandon H said:

Yes, Blink is indeed a fork of WebKit. Chrome originally was on WebKit when it first released before they eventually forked it.

WebKit was always superior to Gecko IMO just from a web developer standpoint. These days though WebKit has gotten pretty stagnated because it's just Apple utilizing it now in Safari.

 

Stick with the Chromium forks like Brave and the like and you'll be fine, most of them strip out the majority of Google's stuff already anyway. The forkers mostly just want the engine and access to the existing extension library.

(luckily) I have Brave as default browser :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Audacious 4.6.1 by Razvan Serea Audacious is a lightweight, open-source audio player that emphasizes simplicity, performance, and sound quality. Designed for Linux, Windows, and macOS, it supports a wide range of audio formats, internet radio streaming, and playlist management. Users can customize the interface with Winamp-style skins or modern themes, making it flexible for different preferences. Audacious also includes an equalizer, advanced audio effects, and a plugin system for extending functionality. Its low resource usage makes it especially suitable for older computers or users who value efficiency without sacrificing playback quality. Audacious key features: High audio quality – delivers clean, gapless playback with minimal distortion. Wide format support – plays MP3, FLAC, Ogg Vorbis, AAC, WAV, WMA, and more. Internet radio streaming – supports Shoutcast, Icecast, and other online streams. Winamp skin support – classic, nostalgic look for users who prefer the old-school style. Modern GTK-based interface – clean, simple UI with a more modern feel. Customizable themes – change appearance through skins and themes. Advanced playlist management – organize, save, and edit playlists with ease. Equalizer – fine-tune audio output with a built-in graphical equalizer. Audio effects – built-in DSP options like crossfade, replay gain, and more. Plugin system – extend functionality with additional components. File metadata support – displays and organizes music based on tags. Drag-and-drop support – quickly add songs or playlists. Global hotkey support – control playback without switching windows. Bit-perfect output modes – bypass system mixers for pure audio output. ReplayGain support – normalizes track loudness automatically. Cue sheet support – play entire albums from a single audio file with .cue. MPRIS2 integration – integrates with Linux desktop environments for media controls. Advanced resampling options – adjust playback quality with different resampler settings. Gapless playback – seamless transition between tracks encoded properly. Crossfade plugin – blend one song into the next smoothly. Last.fm scrobbling plugin – track listening history online. Remote control support – control Audacious via command-line or scripts. Lyrics plugin – display song lyrics if available. Alarm / timer plugin – start or stop playback at set times. SOX resampler plugin – high-quality resampling for audiophiles. Spectrum analyzer / visualization plugins – visual feedback while playing music. Headphone crossfeed effect – simulates speaker listening for headphones. Customizable buffer size – tweak latency and playback smoothness. Audacious 4.6.1 changelog: Use XDG cache dir to store temporary files (#1817) Accept embedded lyrics in more cases (#1818) Bump .so and plugin ABI versions retrospectively (#1819) Include Georgian translation (#1820) Fix build on systems using musl instead of glibc (#1823) Download: Audacious 4.6.1 | 48.2 MB (Open Source) Download: Portable Audacious 4.6.1 | 69.8 MB View: Audacious Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I really wonder if this has to do with the built in VPN or "private DNS" of browsers that trip up legal requirements like cookie consent and Cloudflare (to avoid all the botnet attacks we get). And BTW some botnets still manage to get past Cloudflare, we are constantly having to tweak it to block malicious traffic that ultimately cause a DDoS.
    • CPPC states can also be messed around with in most UEFI settings but aren't as robust as the ones that the Windows Scheduler can provide! Make sure you look into what your motherboard also has before customizing for the Windows Scheduler.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!