Old Man Rant : Some Youtube Camera Angles have got to go.


Recommended Posts

I feel like an old man ranting about this. But i'm seeing there more and more in youtube videos and they are CRINGY AF

i'm talking about the camera angles were we get to see the person talking while looking at another camera.

Example

For 2 seconds he's talking at this angle

image.png.7b6f3e36f9d379985774c29b6a2690a8.png

Then 2 seconds later we get the shot from the camera he's actually talking to

image.png.768746ad6539347612098ead5bc8eee0.png

The most common ones are when they shoot them from the side as they are looking straight forward into the camera

In my opinion, these fads need to quickly die.

The sad part is, people nowadays can't hook their concentration for more than 2 seconds at a time so they have to constantly switch angles. I get that, but that doesn't change my opinion that it's cringy af.

Just look at all the production overhead, you have to record the subject from 2 angles plus you have to edit that crap in.

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Yeah you're right.  I just found that video and it is super-annoying.

And I counted three cameras:

- The one he's looking into
- The one slightly off-axis
- And the one from the side

I'll give him bonus points for decent audio from the lav microphone.  Most channels like this have crappy audio.

But three cameras plus all the B-roll would be a nightmare for the editor.

Check this out... three camera angles in one sentence... holy hell...

plumber-2023-08-24.jpg.9a57cdaca2c4945c26b5cc0983a5fb60.jpg

🤣

  • Haha 2
On 24/08/2023 at 11:12, Michael Scrip said:

Yeah you're right.  I just found that video and it is super-annoying.

And I counted three cameras:

- The one he's looking into
- The one slightly off-axis
- And the one from the side

I'll give him bonus points for decent audio from the lav microphone.  Most channels like this have crappy audio.

But three cameras plus all the B-roll would be a nightmare for the editor.

Check this out... three camera angles in one sentence... holy hell...

plumber-2023-08-24.jpg.9a57cdaca2c4945c26b5cc0983a5fb60.jpg

🤣

ya, my god, the production overhead must be insane.

  • Like 2
On 24/08/2023 at 12:16, Warwagon said:

ya, my god, the production overhead must be insane.

Exactly.

I do video production.  Editing two cameras is tough enough.  Adding a third camera makes the editing even more difficult.  I wouldn't deal with all that production overhead unless I was getting paid well.  

With 558,000 subscribers... he better make enough Youtube money to pay his editors handsomely!

😛

On 24/08/2023 at 11:25, Michael Scrip said:

Exactly.

I do video production.  Editing two cameras is tough enough.  Adding a third camera makes the editing even more difficult.  I wouldn't deal with all that production overhead unless I was getting paid well.  

With 558,000 subscribers... he better make enough Youtube money to pay his editors handsomely!

😛

Ya, why go to all the extra work, when the other 2 angles just look stupid?

Then you also have to have cameras to record those 2 stupid angles.

  • Like 1

"The editors were so preoccupied with whether or not they could... they didn't stop to think if they should..."

- Dr. Ian Malcolm

🤣

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Just the price of doing business. The scamble to pull as much from the web as possible is happening, and it's happening before a case like this changes how or what is legal do to with AI in terms of data harvesting. But even then as we've seen with the likes of Google who ignore cookie requests and just accept the fact they'll get fined, it's built into their business price model now. AI is here, its not going away. Their reward if any from the court case would be best suited to trying to incorprate AI or licence their end points as authentic human verified content. The problem is, as we've seen these same news papers are using AI themselves.
    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!