• 0

Home Virtual Servers Approachs.

Asked by BigPanda,

 Share

Question

Neowinian

BigPanda

Posted
Posted

Hello Neowin,

I have purchased an used Lenovo Ts440 - E3-1245 - 32gb Ram and I am still trying to figure out the best approach to use it as a Virtualization Server.

My goal is to actually run VMs on the server ranging from:

  • CentOS 7+, Ubuntu 20.04+, Windows Server 2019+ Essentials or Standard and some on demand OS such as Windows 10 Pro to do remote desktop and work on specific stuff.

I was looking at both Hyper-V & Vmware Esxi (Free version) to run as the main OS and I was wondering if some of you have comments, suggestions about this approach.

Right now, I am using a small 2bay NAS for NFS, dedicated i3 SSF PC for my Web Development stack and EasyBCD on my workstation for multiboot VHDX OS images.

Sadly the EasyBCD approach still left all my HDD visibles to all OS and can't run them on background.

 

Thank you for your help

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1433294-home-virtual-servers-approachs/
Share on other sites

9 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Grand Master

farmeunit

Posted
Posted

I personally like VMWare better, but either will get the job done.  You get a little better OS selection support from VMWare, I believe, or it used to be that way.  You might look at ProxMox, though, as well.  Lawrence Systems has some good videos on it, as well as others.  

  • 0
Grand Master

Sikh

Posted
Posted

Dont bother using VMWare ESXi for home use. They keep restricting it more. When I upgraded to 6, they started limiting physical CPUs AND Cores so my 8core 16thread system was locked to 4cores 8threads and it wasnt on 5.x.

Use Proxmox instead. Since youll be running linux, I assume you arent afraid to get a little dirty / dont need a UI to fix everything.  This is not to say Proxmox isnt solid, it very much is. But weird things can happen and its nice to know how to troubleshoot / fix them instead of needing to call support.

I have been running Proxmox for years now on 3 different hosts and its been way more rock solid and doesnt come with a bunch of payware (paying to have the ability to backup) ######. 

  • 0
Collaborator

heyitsheather

Posted
Posted

I run Proxmox in my home lab on an older Dell workstation. I find it very easy to use, and if you're already even a little bit familiar with Linux, it should be pretty easy to pick up.

  • 0
Grand Master

+InsaneNutter MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted

I've run VMware ESXi on my home server with a free licence for many years, its been rock solid. That said I can't go past version 6.7 as my hardware is no longer supported, older drivers you could integrate back in are not supported on ESXi 7.0 or later. (My hardware is pretty old at this point to be fair, however still does the job.)

Broadcom are acquiring VMware which has caused a lot of concern for SMB / home lab users, it speculated Broadcom are only really bothered about the large enterprise customers. So how usable it will be in the future (at no cost / an affordable cost home home is up for debate).

If I was starting again today I'd be tempted to look at Proxmox, you get a lot more functionality at no cost and a much larger array of hardware is supported. ESXi is still usable at the time of posting anyway, providing your hardware is supported.

  • 0
Grand Master

Sikh

Posted
Posted
On 10/09/2023 at 03:35, InsaneNutter said:

...

Broadcom are acquiring VMware which has caused a lot of concern for SMB / home lab users, it speculated Broadcom are only really bothered about the large enterprise customers. So how usable it will be in the future (at no cost / an affordable cost home home is up for debate).

...

Woah Broadcom are acquiring VMWare!? I didnt think it was possible for VMWare to be acquired because of how large they are and for how long they have been in the industry but seeing Broadcom is acquiring them makes sense.

I know a decent amount about Broadcom and I really hope they leave the free users alone / give us back some of the stuff we use to have (no limit on CPU Cores, etc) and thats it. 

But even if they return ESXI to what use to be its glory days (ESXi 4 to 5.5), I will be staying with Proxmox. I have it running on 3 hosts that are "in production" in my homelab with a combined 16 cores / 32 threads with 96gbs of RAM and my lab has never been more stable. I have daily backups of the important servers/vms and weekly backups of all of the VMs without any issues and I didnt have to pay for it :D

On 10/09/2023 at 02:16, Sulphy said:

Never heard of Proxmox before... looks pretty cool! Bit overkill for my home lab, as i currently use Virtualbox that does everything i need it to ... 

If you have a server thats headless, Proxmox is it. If you have a single machine / desktop that you use as a server, it makes sense to use virtualbox. 

I love VB but I only use it on my laptops / desktops. If I have a machine dedicated to being a server, its always headless and its dedicated to being a server. 

  • 0
Collaborator

heyitsheather

Posted
Posted
On 10/09/2023 at 03:16, Sulphy said:

Never heard of Proxmox before... looks pretty cool! Bit overkill for my home lab, as i currently use Virtualbox that does everything i need it to ... 

I use Proxmox as like VMWare it's a type 1 hypervisor so you get near bare metal performance and PCI passthrough. Virtualbox is a type 2 hypervisor so it's not so bare metal as there is a host OS in the middle. Last I knew with VirtualBox, it does not support PCI passthrough, though I'm not using that feature at the moment. In the past I have used it for direct NIC assignment to a VM.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to question listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Report: iPhone Air isn't dead, and a second-generation model is planned for 2027

      By sphbecker · Posted

      I'd say the first one failed to be as popular as Apple anticipated, but the easy adjustment here is to make fewer of them next time around. It would only be a "flop" if it isn't possible for Apple to recover the design and factory tooling costs given the number of units sold, which I doubt would be the case. It isn't like no one bought them; it just failed to become the new hot phone of the year.
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones

      By sphbecker · Posted

      You're right that it does not follow the plain meaning of the word, but in this context, it is a legal term defined in 49 U.S.C. Kind of how "wire fraud" laws apply even if a physical wire was not used. Given that it is codified in law, and it isn't just automotive journalists that don't understand evolving technology, I highly doubt congress would change a well understood term just because technology makes the term slightly less actuate.
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones

      By PsYcHoKiLLa · Posted

      "OuT Of My WaYmO !"
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones

      By sphbecker · Posted

      This is exactly why I keep saying we are not ready for human free self-driving. These little "bugs" are may seem like random one-offs. There was also the Waymo that drove between police with drawn weapons and the suspect they were pointing them at. From a software perspective it is easy to understand how those extremely rare situations may not have been programed for, but that is the point. If AI needs to be told to watch out for every possible contingency, then it can never be successful. There will always be the possibility of a first encounter that the AI needs to understand to avoid.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Final

      By Copernic · Posted

      TeraCopy 4.0 Final by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 | 14.6MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      585
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      187
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      74
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!