Recommended Posts

i knew about the old thread, but wait for a couple more times it gets posted before getting really annoyed.l Like the thread about being abled to read things even if all of the letters are ****** up as long as teh beginning letter and end letter are in the righgt place.

well my google has changed for the second time now and i took some high quality shots of it for you guys this time.

all the other pictures i've seen weren't very nice quality. sorry for big pictures but big=quality.

if you want to see a certain page i'll except requests!

lets start off with home google... very simple :)

post-7-1077431806.png

Do you have the latest version of Firefox? I ask because the initial release had some issues with CSS tabs (due to the use of a certain hack that made them work in a certain browser).

Edit: Posted before you finished uploading the other pictures. It does look like an alternate version of Google. On the home page the CSS tabs are gone, replaced by simple text links (which is what the tabs were really, just with backgrounds). Interesting.

the site isnt really better looking or even much different i wonder why they are bothering with the tests

are they afraid they'll lose visitors if they take away the grey background for the categories on the front page without warning or doing testing surveys and focus groups

i dont want a cluttered design its good they keep it simple but maybe they should get a designer. i never liked the google logo either

where are firefox cookies stored? are they stored in the same place as IE?

Nay.

%Appdata%\Phoenix\Profiles\default\whatever.slt\cookies.txt

Open it with wordpad, and look for the line titled ".google.com" and post everything on that line. THanks :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
    • My ice blue precision 3550 laptop
    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      443
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!