ChatGPT v Bard


Recommended Posts

I've recently started using GPT, I find it reasonable useful but extremely biased, quite frustratingly.

I started using Bard more recently and while I believe they operate differently I've found Bard more unbiased.

The acid test is asking something like, Is climate change a hoax, and while I think most accept its isn't both GPT and bard will support it is not a hoax. However if you ask both for any evidence to the contrary, GPT won't answer, Bard will however, albeit you are likely to dismiss or not agree, it gives information.

 

GPT is much more likely to give an "i cant answer that" type responses where Bard will give both sides

 

I've found Bard so far better to use and with the integration eventually of Google word and sheets it will be better 

 

Bard V GPT 

 

The iPhone v Anroid debate for the next decade 😆 

 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1435848-chatgpt-v-bard/
Share on other sites

On 22/11/2023 at 12:12, PmRd said:

Let me guess, ChatGPT is too woke?

Hey I need my AI to tell me maybe the last election was rigged. You know to make sure it's "unbiased".

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

I've not used Bard much, I've done a little more with GPT. With GPT I've used it to produce simple powershell scripts, or fix something in a script and for the most part that works really well, where I've found Bard will output a script but if you ask it to make changes even simple ones it quite often doesn't understand what you're asking. With GPT you need to be wary of the responses, it will respond using the data it's been trained on, this was up to Sept 2021, it may have been updated since. It's also been reported that GPT can "hallucinate" and make up an answer where it doesn't know one, I suspect this is true of other AI's as well.

But it's early days for this technology and businesses and the general public are still working out how/where to use it and the impact it will eventually have on our lives and over the coming years the technology will improve drastically.

On 23/11/2023 at 10:48, AStaUK said:

I've not used Bard much, I've done a little more with GPT. With GPT I've used it to produce simple powershell scripts, or fix something in a script and for the most part that works really well, where I've found Bard will output a script but if you ask it to make changes even simple ones it quite often doesn't understand what you're asking. With GPT you need to be wary of the responses, it will respond using the data it's been trained on, this was up to Sept 2021, it may have been updated since. It's also been reported that GPT can "hallucinate" and make up an answer where it doesn't know one, I suspect this is true of other AI's as well.

But it's early days for this technology and businesses and the general public are still working out how/where to use it and the impact it will eventually have on our lives and over the coming years the technology will improve drastically.

I asked Bard a question I knew the answer to yesterday regarding an engineering process.

 

The answer looked great, but mixed up and intertwined the procedures from 2 completely different products and process from different continent's!

I've found with GPT is can get the most basic math problems incorrect, so I have a habits if asking it to recheck its answers to which jt will usually more often than not get it right.

 

Other occasions it will insist it's right, and only when I point out a flaw it will "apologise" and recalculate or evaluate 

 

I find AI useful and see great potential but it seems its only as useful as the information it draws 

AI is no different to any other application, garbage in garbage out. When setting up services using AI the governance is as important as the technical side, you need to validate the information you are training the model on is accurate and you need to secure the training material and the model itself against tampering from either curious individuals or those with malicious intent.

AI has been around for a little while, what has changed is that it's now more accessible and we're now starting to see applications emerge that are making use of it and we're only at the start of that journey and have a long way to go. For now if you're using AI you should still fact check the output and not take it for gospel.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • What people who support this position of LibreOffice do not understand is that EuroOffice is not made to appease the open source enthusiasts (I am also one) and evangelists. EuroOffice was made because some European companies wanted independence from Microsoft Office Suite, which is something installable on your computer. This move to independence was pushed by public institutions and governments in Europe, as well. Using a proprietary FORMAT as default, does not make you dependent on MS. The actual program does. A format can be changed with a simple update in the future in a dystopian world where MS would manipulate the format to lock others out. However, using MS Office proprietary format, guarantees that all the current documents used by companies, organizations, institutions, etc, will be compatible with EuroOffice and the suite will have the best chances at adoption, especially by slow moving organizations like governments and the public sector. It is as simple as that. For the same reason, even the UI is incredibly similar to MS Office. For the same reason (adoption) the choice was made to be open source. Not because EU particularly loves open source ideologically, but because it gives the best starting point to create trust in the project and amass developers and contributions to the project quickly, to catch up with proprietary projects like MS Office. I don't understand how people don't realize it.
    • How old is this tip? Seems 15-20 years old? Processor states for the CPU under Windows power options has been a thing for a long, long time. It certainly isn't new or hidden... Also, with laptops it doesn't make any difference what OS you are running, all of them are configured for battery longevity over performance, for obvious reasons.
    • I can't believe Starmer is still there...his party lost so big. He's a stubborn coot, but this is largely unenforceable, so I would imagine he'll be resigning soon. A key here is for parents to buy their kids phones sans Internet access--and set up the Internet at home, where mom and day can, you know, act like parents instead expecting the government to raise their kids.
    • EA launches in-game advertising platform for brands to "connect with audiences" by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The gaming giant Electronic Arts is exploring more ways to inject real-life brands into its games. Announced today as EA Advertising, the new platform is attempting to make it easier for brands to reach out for deals with the company and put their products inside titles like EA Sports FC, Madden, NHL, Skate, or The Sims. EA revealed that its EA Sports side of the company brings in "hundreds of millions of players across console, PC, and mobile" every year. Fan engagement of these titles was also touted as being "extraordinary," with 23,000 NFL seasons worth of games being played in Madden NFL daily, while EA Sports FC sees over a billion matches a day. “Players come to EA’s games and live experiences every day to play, watch, create and connect,” said David Tinson, Chief Experiences Officer at Electronic Arts. “That gives brands a meaningful opportunity to show up in ways that add value and respect the player experience, while maintaining authenticity in the worlds our teams are building. With EA Advertising, we’re helping brands become part of those moments in ways that are relevant and built for players.” Using the new program EA Advertising, brands will be able to inject their products into games in real-time via dynamic placement. EA says partners will have access to everything from stadium signage in sports games and targeted adverts to in-game content custom-made for the brands. These are described as additions designed to "enhance, not disrupt" experiences. "In these interactive gameplay environments, brands become part of the game itself, reflecting how players engage with advertising in real-world contexts," adds the company "Brands can activate across live environments, tailoring placements to meet campaign objectives, and update campaigns with ongoing optimization informed by aggregated engagement insights." Current real-world brand partnerships EA has built into its games include Visa (EA Sports FC and College Football), Lowe's (EA Sports FC, Madden NFL, and College Football), Red Bull (EA SPORTS FC), Xfinity and Peacock (EA SPORTS FC), and Mountain Dew’s (College Football).
    • Will be surprised if there isn't a new ver of youtube just for labelled educational content
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      204
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      91
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      85
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!