• 1

[POLL] What is the definitive best FREE antivirus for 2024?


What is the best FREE antivirus software for 2024?  

73 members have voted

  1. 1. What is your favorite FREE antivirus software for 2024?

    • Avanquest Adware Antivirus/Protect (formerly Lavasoft)
      0
    • Avast! Free Antivirus (owned by Gen Digital)
      3
    • AVG Free Antivirus (owned by Gen Digital)
      1
    • Avira Free Antivirus (owned by Gen Digital)
      0
    • Baidu Antivirus
      0
    • Bitdefender Free
      10
    • Check Point ZoneAlarm Free
      0
    • ClamWin/ClamAV (owned by Cisco)
      2
    • Comodo Anti-Virus/Internet Security
      1
    • Dr. Web CureIt!
      0
    • Fortinet Forticlient
      1
    • Kaspersky Lab Security Cloud (free)
      11
    • Malwarebytes Anti Malware (free)
      5
    • Microsoft Windows Defender (free)
      48
    • Qihu 360 Total Security
      0
    • Secureaplus
      0
    • Sophos Home / Surfright Hitman Pro
      0
    • Tencent PC Manager
      0
    • WatchGuard Antivirus (formerly Panda Security)
      0
    • Other (specify below)
      3

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 01/01/25 at 06:40

Question

Hello, 
  
This is the 2024 poll for best free anti-virus (aka anti-malware aka internet security aka endpoint security) security software.  
  
The poll for paid products is located here .  The poll for last year's best free antivirus is located here
  
If your choice is not listed, please choose "other" and reply below with its name.

This year the poll is multiple choice, so that you can select two (or more) choices.  If you do choose multiple options, please leave a comment with the ones you chose and why.  
  
Regards, 
  
Aryeh Goretsky 

20 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Since most antivirus developers share their detection databases with each other, the free versions should all perform similarly.

Added value comes from additional features, something that is usually lacking in the free editions.

  • Dislike 1
  • 0
On 02/01/2024 at 13:22, Joe User said:

Since most antivirus developers share their detection databases with each other, the free versions should all perform similarly.

Added value comes from additional features, something that is usually lacking in the free editions.

Hello,

No, they most assuredly do not share their detection databases.  What they sometimes share are copies of malicious software, URLs, IP addresses, and sometimes metadata or other information in order to provide nuance or context when required, such as possible relations to other malicious activity, interesting things they may have come across in their investigation, and so forth. 

It is up to each company to determine how to detect each threat.

Now, there are companies which own multiple brands, and their products are going to perform similarly, and there are also companies for whom a large part of their business is licensing their products to other companies.  But those are only notable exceptions because their detections cluster.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

  • Like 3
  • 0

strategy

On 02/01/2024 at 15:17, GSDragoon said:

Common Sense

Common sense is only one layer of a security strategy. This is post is about anti-virus.

 

 

On 02/01/2024 at 15:22, Joe User said:

Since most antivirus developers share their detection databases with each other, the free versions should all perform similarly.

Added value comes from additional features, something that is usually lacking in the free editions.

Those additional features are mostly junk IMO and not needed.

  • 0

I see no point in installing a 3rd-party anti-virus as Windows Defender is more than good enough if used with a little common sense, ad-blocker, and prompt installing of security updates.

  • Like 2
  • 0
On 02/01/2024 at 14:17, GSDragoon said:

Common Sense

t9t5wo.thumb.jpg.37e19d11fae0949b19fe11481bab8e46.jpg

How does Common Sense protect against a 0-Day exploit that requires no user interaction to run?

  • 0

Microsoft Windows Defender (free)

when I was on Windows that's what I stuck with as it was good enough and generally stayed out of your way. but that paired with GSDragoon's 'Common Sense' answer goes along ways. because as some say, 'security is only as strong as your weakest link'. the weakest link in many cases is the end-user. I know Warwagon came back with a 0-Day, which is legitimate, but as long as someone keeps their browser up-to-date and avoids shady sites, while it can't guarantee you are protected, chances are you will be fine (would it be fair to say those exploiting 0-Day tend to target higher value targets? (i.e. the average user probably don't have to worry too much)). hell, I might even argue in regards to 0-day exploits to use a non-Chrome browser since I would imagine that's targeted most in general since it's got the largest share. so using Firefox (or another alternative) should hopefully keep the chances of a 0-Day to a minimum and I would imagine those exploiting 0-Day stuff probably go after higher value targets(?) unless it's easy to get a bunch of random people hoping the data they can get from them is valuable.

p.s. but besides common sense, I prefer Linux as the best anti-virus since it's pretty much virus-free in regards to your typical desktop user (even if it's technically not virus-free, it's probably close enough to that standard as I can't recall hearing stories of the average user getting infected with a virus on Linux as I would imagine nowadays it's more likely someone to install a shady browser extension or fall for some online scam more than a random virus getting them). so that paired with common sense (like avoiding Phishing etc), goes along way and I use Firefox as my primary browser which should further help. I have not looked lately, but I would imagine there have been some 0-Day's exploited on Firefox but it's probably not often enough to be too much of a concern, and like I mentioned above, I would imagine those are probably geared more towards higher value targets(?), unless of course it's easy to get a lot of people to get infected fairly easily in which case the shady people are probably hoping the sheer volume of people getting hit would give them some valuable info etc.

  • 0

Windows Defender + Think before you Click suffices for most security needs. So long as you take the time to permanently disable its shady scareware that'll be endlessly trying to scare you into handing over 24/7 file access/uploading to Microsoft if you dare to set its Automatic Sample submission setting to prompt you before sending anything.

WindowsDefenderScarewaretoHandoverPrivacytoMicroshaft(2023_11.14).thumb.png.a31d641a96a7c27606d3a2f70608cc48.png

To permanently disable the nagging scareware notifications, you'll need to set the following registry key, then they'll disappear from Windows Defender's GUI without disabling all other notifications:

HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows Defender\Spynet

DWORD: SubmitSamplesConsent

Value: 2

The very fact that the DWORD for disabling them is under a key named "Spynet" only further shows why you really should have its Automatic Sample submission setting notify you before sending anything.

  • 0

I like basic eset nod32. For it's low system impact, and the constant micro def updating.

Look for the "Eset NOD Anitvirus 202X Gamer Edition" which is really silly branding of the basic / essential edition that is sometime sold cheaper.
It's just the core anti-virus / pup (potentially unwanted apps), no password manager, parental controls, firewall, vpn, etc.

That isn't to say other's there's a better product on the market.
How good an AV is can easily change over time, what's good today, can less effective tomorrow. 

 

 

 

Edited by Eternal Tempest
  • Like 2
  • 0
On 02/01/2024 at 15:17, GSDragoon said:

Common Sense

We're entering a weird age where someone can group up in school with a Chrome Book / Tablet, do everything with the phone. Then pick up a computer years latter and try a computer OS for the very first time late in life. It may seem like common sense, but in reality, they don't have the basics to be able to base common sense off of.

It's not lack of common sense in some cases, it's no reference point to base it off of.

  • 0
On 04/01/2024 at 05:16, Eternal Tempest said:

We're entering a weird age where someone can group up in school with a Chrome Book / Tablet, do everything with the phone. Then pick up a computer years latter and try a computer OS for the very first time late in life. It may seem like common sense, but in reality, they don't have the basics to be able to base common sense off of.

It's not lack of common sense in some cases, it's no reference point to base it off of.

So true, I've noticed this at work in recent years.

In some ways it's more we had this bubble of people who are currently 30-40ish (give or take a few years) that grew up at the right time and learned good basic computer skills, mainly because having a computer at home and getting the internet became the thing to do in the late 90s / 2000s.

As a kid back then even if you had no interest in computers you still went home from School, went on MSN (here in the UK anyway) and messaged your friends all evening. It was just the thing to do. You'd figure out how to use Office and learn computer basics in general as it made doing homework so much easier. You probably even learned some networking basics if you wanted to play / host a game online.

Today we have a whole generation that has grown up with tablets, smartphones and Chromebooks, so basic computer skills beyond using a web browser can be quite lacking.

  • 0
On 08/01/2024 at 10:45, EmperorA said:

Tencent PC Manager and Baidu AV were discontinued in English from what I understand.

Surprised to see them mentioned.

 

edit: typos

Hello,

They are still available for download, as is Kingsoft, I believe.  I always try to list programs that are widely available, even if they aren't well-known in the English language-speaking world.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

  • 0

I voted for Microsoft Windows Defender (free). Having used it since the Microsoft AntiSpyware days on Windows XP I feel Defender has evolved in to a great product, it does what it needs to do without letting you know its there.

Combined with a good content filtering plugin such as uBlock Origin I feel Defender is all I personally need on my devices.

I did run Sophos Home for a few months a couple of years ago, however I found theirs a noticeable performance impact, especially when browsing. I was mainly curious how it compared to Sophos Endpoint / Intercept X we run at work.

  • Like 2
  • 0
On 08/01/2024 at 23:26, goretsky said:

They are still available for download, as is Kingsoft, I believe.  I always try to list programs that are widely available, even if they aren't well-known in the English language-speaking world.
 

They are not available to download from their respective official websites. Baidu's English AV stopped being updated in 2015-16, plus the official website has not available for a while. 3rd Party download source FileHorse shows it has last been updated in 2015. Official Global website antivirus.baidu.com (Down)

Tencent PC Manager's English (Global) website has also been taken down. 3rd Party download source MajorGeeks shows it as being last updated in 2020. Official Global website: www.pcmgr-global.com (Down)

You can still download them from 3rd party sites... but I'd trust the AV more if their own official websites were still up, I have no idea if the database lists for either of them are still updated.

I believe that for both the Chinese variants are still updated/maintained, but I haven't visited those websites in a while.

Checked Kingsoft Antivirus, Cnet shows it was last updated in 2012. Official website www.kingsoftsecurity.com (down)

 

I personally tried Baidu and Tencent PC Manager back when they were still being supported.

  • 0
On 03/01/2024 at 07:25, goretsky said:

Hello,

No, they most assuredly do not share their detection databases.  What they sometimes share are copies of malicious software, URLs, IP addresses, and sometimes metadata or other information in order to provide nuance or context when required, such as possible relations to other malicious activity, interesting things they may have come across in their investigation, and so forth. 

It is up to each company to determine how to detect each threat.

Now, there are companies which own multiple brands, and their products are going to perform similarly, and there are also companies for whom a large part of their business is licensing their products to other companies.  But those are only notable exceptions because their detections cluster.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

I was under the impression that most of the major players shared enough data to create signatures. Thanks for the correction.

  • 0
On 09/01/2024 at 16:49, Joe User said:

I was under the impression that most of the major players shared enough data to create signatures. Thanks for the correction.

Hello,

Every developer has their own way of creating detections, and they can be very different from each other.  Even when malware samples are shared, it is up to each recipient to determine if and how to add detection for it, and when.  For example, a malware sample received from a VIP customer might have a higher priority for analysis and detection than something sent to a bulk sample feed.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!