Toyota commits Kamikaze on Tesla Cybertruck


Recommended Posts

image.jpeg

The California Highway Patrol confirmed to The Verge that police responded to a two-vehicle incident on SR 35 in Palo Alto. No one involved in the crash suffered a major injury. According to Teslarati, the Cybertruck was driven by a Tesla engineer based in San Francisco.

In a statement to The Verge, California police said the following:

 

Quote

Our preliminary investigation indicates a Toyota Corolla was traveling south on SR-35 southbound, south of Page Mill Road, at an unknown speed, when the driver, for unknown reasons, turned to the right and subsequently struck a dirt embankment on the right shoulder. The Toyota then re-entered the roadway, crossed over the double yellow lines into the northbound lane, and crashed into a Tesla Cybertruck traveling north on SR-35 northbound.

 

The images posted to Reddit reveal significant damage to the Toyota Corolla’s front, while the Cybertruck appears relatively unscathed in comparison, despite the deployment of airbags.

Source: The Verge via MobileSyrup | Image credit boddhya Reddit

  • 4 months later...

That RAM pickup did crumple as designed; this is to absorb the impact of the crash.  It may not look pretty, but it's best to just never be in a collision, both vehicles have other hidden damage that might not be obvious immediately.

Today's mainstream pickups are not designed to be tanks, they are designed the same way other vehicles are, to protect the occupants in a collision.

On 16/05/2024 at 15:54, DocM said:

Recently a Cybertruck was rear-ended by a RAM 1500 TRX pickup (supercharged V8 off-roader).  

 

450-miles-in-got-rear-ended-v0-fjjsccf7rmkc1.thumb.jpg.3277cb5623a0a708ecb58826aadb4133.jpg

450-miles-in-got-rear-ended-v0-dhvifcf7rmkc1.thumb.jpg.c4e5961516fc080e275d79529821c6df.jpg

 

 

 

 

Wow...this 3 month old incident really got you all warm and fuzzy that you've had to post it in two seperate threads. 

...a ~2002 Dodge Ram crumple zones did their job.  Wow.  Amazing.

On 16/05/2024 at 18:29, Jim K said:

Wow...this 3 month old incident really got you all warm and fuzzy that you've had to post it in two seperate threads. 

...a ~2002 Dodge Ram crumple zones did their job.  Wow.  Amazing.

 

I don't see you complaining about much older posts around here, example being the flooded battery from last year. Picky, picky.

 

On 16/05/2024 at 18:15, DocM said:

 

I don't see you complaining about much older posts around here, example being the flooded battery from last year. Picky, picky.

 

What flooded battery?  I don't see a post in this Kamikaze Toyota thread about a flooded battery? 

On 17/05/2024 at 00:15, DocM said:

 

I don't see you complaining about much older posts around here, example being the flooded battery from last year. Picky, picky.

 

Oh this is a ###### joke - seeing as how picky you can be with news, polls, etc. 

I wouldn't be surprised if the insurance companies doesn't jack up the rates when insuring these trucks for the amount of damage they create.

On 17/05/2024 at 08:34, primortal said:

I wouldn't be surprised if the insurance companies doesn't jack up the rates when insuring these trucks for the amount of damage they create.

Many drivers are buying Tesla Insurance. Their certified shops have the facilities. Cheaper too,

Seeing as how Tesla seem to play it loose and easy with their honoring of warrantees, I wouldn't truth their insurance as far as... well as far as the MuskMobile can travel on a 30 minute charge.  Which isn't far.  Because it's crap!

On 17/05/2024 at 17:53, Dick Montage said:

Seeing as how Tesla seem to play it loose and easy with their honoring of warrantees, I wouldn't truth their insurance as far as... well as far as the MuskMobile can travel on a 30 minute charge.  Which isn't far.  Because it's crap!

 

Auto insurance is mostly regulated at the state level, and they have to jump jump through loops to get certified. It's really no different than General Motors and OnStar insurance.

On 17/05/2024 at 10:27, adrynalyne said:

Except its not a RAM 1500 TRX.

 

No comment @DocM? You were trying to make it a bigger deal saying it was a “RAM 1500 TRX pickup (supercharged V8 off-roader)”. 

On 17/05/2024 at 22:20, adrynalyne said:

No comment @DocM? You were trying to make it a bigger deal saying it was a “RAM 1500 TRX pickup (supercharged V8 off-roader)”. 

That was what some of the reports said it was. Either way, it's a big RAM. 

On 17/05/2024 at 20:54, DocM said:

That was what some of the reports said it was. Either way, it's a big RAM. 

Well that just goes to show that you don’t fact check the stuff you post. 

  • Like 2
On 18/05/2024 at 02:09, DocM said:

 

Auto insurance is mostly regulated at the state level, and they have to jump jump through loops to get certified. It's really no different than General Motors and OnStar insurance.

Obviously.  But there are good insurers who don't try to get out of paying out, and then there are others...  You know this, which makes your post pointless.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!