Toyota commits Kamikaze on Tesla Cybertruck


Recommended Posts

image.jpeg

The California Highway Patrol confirmed to The Verge that police responded to a two-vehicle incident on SR 35 in Palo Alto. No one involved in the crash suffered a major injury. According to Teslarati, the Cybertruck was driven by a Tesla engineer based in San Francisco.

In a statement to The Verge, California police said the following:

 

Quote

Our preliminary investigation indicates a Toyota Corolla was traveling south on SR-35 southbound, south of Page Mill Road, at an unknown speed, when the driver, for unknown reasons, turned to the right and subsequently struck a dirt embankment on the right shoulder. The Toyota then re-entered the roadway, crossed over the double yellow lines into the northbound lane, and crashed into a Tesla Cybertruck traveling north on SR-35 northbound.

 

The images posted to Reddit reveal significant damage to the Toyota Corolla’s front, while the Cybertruck appears relatively unscathed in comparison, despite the deployment of airbags.

Source: The Verge via MobileSyrup | Image credit boddhya Reddit

  • 4 months later...

That RAM pickup did crumple as designed; this is to absorb the impact of the crash.  It may not look pretty, but it's best to just never be in a collision, both vehicles have other hidden damage that might not be obvious immediately.

Today's mainstream pickups are not designed to be tanks, they are designed the same way other vehicles are, to protect the occupants in a collision.

On 16/05/2024 at 15:54, DocM said:

Recently a Cybertruck was rear-ended by a RAM 1500 TRX pickup (supercharged V8 off-roader).  

 

450-miles-in-got-rear-ended-v0-fjjsccf7rmkc1.thumb.jpg.3277cb5623a0a708ecb58826aadb4133.jpg

450-miles-in-got-rear-ended-v0-dhvifcf7rmkc1.thumb.jpg.c4e5961516fc080e275d79529821c6df.jpg

 

 

 

 

Wow...this 3 month old incident really got you all warm and fuzzy that you've had to post it in two seperate threads. 

...a ~2002 Dodge Ram crumple zones did their job.  Wow.  Amazing.

On 16/05/2024 at 18:29, Jim K said:

Wow...this 3 month old incident really got you all warm and fuzzy that you've had to post it in two seperate threads. 

...a ~2002 Dodge Ram crumple zones did their job.  Wow.  Amazing.

 

I don't see you complaining about much older posts around here, example being the flooded battery from last year. Picky, picky.

 

On 16/05/2024 at 18:15, DocM said:

 

I don't see you complaining about much older posts around here, example being the flooded battery from last year. Picky, picky.

 

What flooded battery?  I don't see a post in this Kamikaze Toyota thread about a flooded battery? 

On 17/05/2024 at 00:15, DocM said:

 

I don't see you complaining about much older posts around here, example being the flooded battery from last year. Picky, picky.

 

Oh this is a ###### joke - seeing as how picky you can be with news, polls, etc. 

I wouldn't be surprised if the insurance companies doesn't jack up the rates when insuring these trucks for the amount of damage they create.

On 17/05/2024 at 08:34, primortal said:

I wouldn't be surprised if the insurance companies doesn't jack up the rates when insuring these trucks for the amount of damage they create.

Many drivers are buying Tesla Insurance. Their certified shops have the facilities. Cheaper too,

Seeing as how Tesla seem to play it loose and easy with their honoring of warrantees, I wouldn't truth their insurance as far as... well as far as the MuskMobile can travel on a 30 minute charge.  Which isn't far.  Because it's crap!

On 17/05/2024 at 17:53, Dick Montage said:

Seeing as how Tesla seem to play it loose and easy with their honoring of warrantees, I wouldn't truth their insurance as far as... well as far as the MuskMobile can travel on a 30 minute charge.  Which isn't far.  Because it's crap!

 

Auto insurance is mostly regulated at the state level, and they have to jump jump through loops to get certified. It's really no different than General Motors and OnStar insurance.

On 17/05/2024 at 10:27, adrynalyne said:

Except its not a RAM 1500 TRX.

 

No comment @DocM? You were trying to make it a bigger deal saying it was a “RAM 1500 TRX pickup (supercharged V8 off-roader)”. 

On 17/05/2024 at 22:20, adrynalyne said:

No comment @DocM? You were trying to make it a bigger deal saying it was a “RAM 1500 TRX pickup (supercharged V8 off-roader)”. 

That was what some of the reports said it was. Either way, it's a big RAM. 

On 17/05/2024 at 20:54, DocM said:

That was what some of the reports said it was. Either way, it's a big RAM. 

Well that just goes to show that you don’t fact check the stuff you post. 

  • Like 2
On 18/05/2024 at 02:09, DocM said:

 

Auto insurance is mostly regulated at the state level, and they have to jump jump through loops to get certified. It's really no different than General Motors and OnStar insurance.

Obviously.  But there are good insurers who don't try to get out of paying out, and then there are others...  You know this, which makes your post pointless.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
    • It's listed #399.99 on Amazon, per your link. It's not $299.99.
    • Wonder how much of this it related to them using something like Mythos. It seems everybody is releasing large numbers of updates in the last few weeks.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      535
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      263
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      59
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!