• 0

Global code and functions in ASP.net


Question

I'm designing a site in ASP.NET C#. I'm used to programming in Classic ASP (Javascript) but .NET is somewhat different.

In Classic ASP I used to have an include file with all my global functions defined in it. I would then use the "include file=" tag to include that global file in all of my ASP pages. That way I never had to re-write code, I had a single file containing all the common code that I used.

Basicly I want to do the same thing in ASP.net, but I cant quite figure out how to do it. At the moment my basic site structure has a ASPX file with markup only in it, then I have a seperate code behind file for each ASPX page.

Is there any way that I can have a group of global functions defined in a file that can also be included in all my pages like I did in Classic ASP?

For example I'd like:

* an ASPX file with HTML and ASP markup tags and Layout

* a custom code behind file for each individual ASPX file

* a global code behind file which contains commonly used functions and variables

Of course if there is a better way of achieveing my aim I'm definatley open to suggestions.

Thanks in advance for any help! :)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/143945-global-code-and-functions-in-aspnet/
Share on other sites

13 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

This is how I do things in VB.

<%@ Page Language="VB" SRC="/inc/Global.vb" ContentType="text/html" %>

But that eliminates your individual CodeBehind I guess...

so why now just do:

<%@ Page Language="VB" SRC="/inc/INDIVIDUAL CODEBEHIND.vb" ContentType="text/html" %>
<!--#include virtual="/inc/global.aspx" -->

and have global.aspx:

<script runat="server" language="VB">

Sub thisFunctionOwns(AndIsGlobal as Boolean) as String

End Sub
</script>

vb of course.

However, depending on the size of the site, you could do one global code behind.

  • 0

Thanks Original_, another question, I have managed to create a global.asax file, with a global.asax.cs code behind file.

This is the basic layout of my "global.asax.cs" file:

using System;
using blah-blah;

public class Global : System.Web.HttpApplication {

    public void Session_Start (object Sender, EventArgs e) {

        // CODE IN HERE

    }

    public string SomeLeetThing () {

        // CODE IN HERE
        return "whatever";

    }

}

On my pages I am referencing the SomeLeetThing function as:

string GoodString = Global.SomeLeetThing()

But I always get the following compilation error:

  Quote
Compiler Error Message: CS0246: The type or namespace name 'Global' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)

I've tried a lot of variations, none work, so just wondering, do you know how to reference Global objects in C# (but I will also take VB)

Thanks

  • 0

how about object orientated programing.


(common.aspx.cs)

---------------------------

namespace Whatever

{

public class common

{

//your code here

}

}

(test.aspx.cs)

-----------------------------------

namespace Whatever

{

Whatever.common cm;

public class test

{

public test()

{

cm = new common();

}

}

}

  • 0

Thanks rundkaas,

Basicly what you have explained above is how to access functions from the common.aspx.cs from within the text.aspx.cs file (by setting up a common object). But what you havent explained (or what i think you havent explained) is how to initially import the file common.aspx into the test.aspx.cs file so that I can set up the common.aspx.cs object.

EXAMPLE:

Lets just say I have the following 3 files in my site:

test.aspx <- the file with all the markup in it

test.aspx.cs <- C# code designed specificly for the test.aspx page

common.aspx.cs <- Global C# code with functions and values that I can use throughout the whole site.

I want to use the above 3 files together, so I can access the code from common.aspx.cs in my test.aspx.cs file.

What code do I need to use to initally get access to the common.aspx.cs file from within the test.aspx.cs file?

Thanks,

I REALLY appreciate the help, but would you mind clarifying what you wrote above? :)

  • 0

I'm not sure what you want, but I just call the needed functions from in this case test.aspx.cs,

but if I get you correct you want the code to work like it's in the file physicaly?

If that is the case then I don't realy have an answer, but I know you could use another class as page, or better to use the global file as an interface.

These are just sugestions, and I'm still not sure I got what you wanted, but a combination of the before mention tricks should do it.

  • 0

In reference to your common/include page that you had before.

You could create a class that handles all your common code that you were talking about. Then in each page, you can inherit that class, which would give you the functionality of the common class.

You didn't specify whether your include file was a clientside or server side include file. But with this class inheritance it would be doing the server side functionality

  • 0

In reference to your global question.

It sounds like you may be missing a reference to global in your pages. I'm not sure why you would be doing this though. I'm pretty sure the global is run only once, when the application first starts. I would recommend putting that functionality elsewhere, get it out of the global file.

  • 0

(common.aspx.cs)
---------------------------
namespace Whatever
{
public class common
{
//your code here
}

}

(test.aspx.cs)
-----------------------------------
namespace Whatever
{
 Whatever.common cm;
 public class test
  {
   public test()
   {
   cm = new common();
   }
  }
}

In the above example it is showing how to create an object inside the text.aspx.cs file which represents the class "Whatever.common", that namespace and class exists in the common.aspx.cs file.

Thats fine, I understand that bit, but when I recreate somthing similar to the above example on my site I get an error saying the namespace/class "Whatever.common" doesnt exist.

I assume this is because there is no reference to the common.aspx.cs file inside the text.aspx.cs file, hence it cant find the "Whatever.common" namespace/class.

So my question is, how do I tell the file text.aspx.cs that the namespace/class "Whatever.common" is inside the common.aspx.cs file?

(Basicly you guys are showing step 2, which is accessing my global code, but your not telling me step 1 which is how to get access to my global code file in the first place).

Again, I really appreciate they help, but as you can see I'm having trouble getting the message across about what I need to know (which is prolly my fault)

  • 0
  Jelly2003 said:
This is the basic layout of my "global.asax.cs" file:

using System;
using blah-blah;

public class Global : System.Web.HttpApplication {

    public void Session_Start (object Sender, EventArgs e) {

        // CODE IN HERE

    }

    public string SomeLeetThing () {

        // CODE IN HERE
        return "whatever";

    }

}

On my pages I am referencing the SomeLeetThing function as:

string GoodString = Global.SomeLeetThing()

But I always get the following compilation error:

I've tried a lot of variations, none work, so just wondering, do you know how to reference Global objects in C# (but I will also take VB)

Thanks

Make the method, SomeLeetThing, static. Then you can refer to it with the Global.SomeLeetThing() syntax.

Or, you could add a reference to the current application to the Session state OnSessionStart.

public class Global : System.Web.HttpApplication
	{
  /// &lt;summary&gt;
  /// Required designer variable.
  /// &lt;/summary&gt;
  private System.ComponentModel.IContainer components = null;

  public Global()
  {
 	 InitializeComponent();
  }	
  
  protected void Application_Start(Object sender, EventArgs e)
  {
            
  }

  protected void Session_Start(Object sender, EventArgs e)
  {
                     this.Session.Add( "GlobalRef", this );
  }
            // ... other events	and the SomeLeetThing method definition.
	}

You can access the reference and use it like so:

 private void Page_Load(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
  {
 	 // Put user code to initialize the page here
 	 Global app = (Global)Session["GlobalRef"];
 	 Response.Write( app.SomeLeetThing () );
  }

You should also clear the session state collection on session end

  • 0

Test.aspx:

&lt;%@ Page language="c#" Codebehind="test.aspx.cs" AutoEventWireup="false" Inherits="whatever.test"%>

I have to point it out that I', using Visual Studio, and that compilles it to a dll,

and I hope you got application right for the directory you are working in

  • 0

Thats probably the answer! VS.NET is probably compiling and putting the resulting DLL inside the /bin/ folder, so all you need to do is create an object to represent that DLL file!

I'm using Dreamweaver which doesn't auto compile, I just let it all compile on first run of my application (like when i type in "http://localhost/my_leet_application/").

I suppose I shall have to learn how to use CSC to compile my global code b4 running my web application.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Windows 10 KB5063159 fixes bug that wouldn't let some Microsoft Surface devices boot by Sayan Sen Microsoft released Windows 10 Patch Tuesday updates for the month last week. The one for Windows 10 under KB5060533 / KB5060531 / KB5061010 / KB5060998 introduced a bug that would not let Surface Hub v1 devices start due to a Secure Boot validation issue. As such, Microsoft had paused the update similar to the compatibility blocks or safeguard holds it applies for major feature updates as well. This bug was uncovered after the update went live, as Microsoft later added it to the list of known issues for that update and it also put up a big notice in bold. It wrote: Earlier today, the company released an out-of-band (OOB) update to address the issue. It has been published under KB5063159 and is only being offered to Surface Hub v1 devices instead of the buggy KB5060533 Patch Tuesday one. In the description of the new OOB update, Microsoft writes: You can find the support article for KB5063159 here on Microsoft's website. It is downloaded and installed automatically but users can also manually download it from the Microsoft Update Catalog website.
    • I thought I saw that one, and yeah, it was awhile ago, too..
    • Jumping unicorns says that I forgot you. I never grunt.
    • Microsoft can't help break Windows Outlook as even opening an email now sends it crashing by Sayan Sen It is no surprise that right now, Microsoft's priority is to move users onto the New Outlook for Windows if they haven't done so already. The company began default-deployment of the new app on fresh Microsoft 365 systems and also made switching between the New app and the classic app easier. At the same time, the company is also trying to improve the new app as it recently added yet another feature that will allow people to use the app without an internet connection, and it also blocked more file types to improve security. Perhaps as a consequence of this relentless pursuit, the classic Outlook app has become quite prone to bugs and issues in recent times as Microsoft may be losing its focus. For example, in April, the downloads for Classic Outlook broke and more recently, this month, the tech giant confirmed that a major Calendar feature upgrade has broken the app in several different ways. Microsoft has provided workarounds for several of the issues so check this article out if you are having problems. And the bugs just keep on coming as Microsoft earlier today confirmed that opening emails or starting a new email will now crash the application, and it affects all channels. The company explains: Opening a mail on an email client is probably the most common and basic functionality a user is expected to do, so it is annoying to see such a bug not getting caught during testing. Again, this perhaps indicates that Microsoft's focus maybe elsewhere at the moment. The company has shared the Windows Event Viewer Log for the crash and the problematic OLMAPI32 DLL file is related to Microsoft Messaging Application Programming Interface (MAPI). The issue reminds us of the similar OLEAUT32 dll issue fix in our recent ReactOS article. The event viewer log notes: Faulting application name: OUTLOOK.EXE, version: 16.0.14334.20090, time stamp: 0x683fe030 Faulting module name: OLMAPI32.DLL, version: 16.0.14334.20090, time stamp: 0x683ff910 Exception code: 0xc0000409 Fault offset: 0x00196e1c Faulting process id: 0x9100 Faulting application start time: 0x01dbdbe04fe54514 Faulting application path: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Office\root\Office16\OUTLOOK.EXE Faulting module path: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Office\root\Office16\OLMAPI32.DLL Thankfully, Microsoft has issued a workaround for the problem as it currently investigates the bug by manually creating a FORMS2 folder which should exist at the following address: C:\Users\\AppData\Local\Microsoft\FORMS2. Microsoft explains: You can find the support article for the issue here on Microsoft's official website.
    • I have no issue with a service not being offered free. That's perfectly understandable. I do have issue with seeing ads literally everywhere these days, though, plastered in layers over every website and in every app. Especially with how annoying they tend to be (hell, many ads these days even promote literal scams). That's why people use ad blockers. Let me choose. Offer an ad-free experience for a couple of bucks (but be reasonable, don't get too greedy) or ads for free access. Don't make it ads or nothing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      korostelev earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rozermack875 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      oneworldtechnologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Veteran
      matthiew went up a rank
      Veteran
    • Enthusiast
      Motoman26 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      687
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      268
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      183
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      177
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      140
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!