Neowin main page uses over 1.5 GB of ram, why?


Recommended Posts

On 20/01/2025 at 21:27, Edouard said:

Fair enough.

Steven did mention a few days ago that around 50% of site visitors block ads. I realize you don't but I had no idea it would be that many.

Monetising websites is a tricky proposition at the best of times... People are used to stuff being free so it's hard to get them to go for paid subs... Honestly, if it were say $19.99 a year for a level 2, I'd sub up as that seems a far more reasonable amount to me, hence me saying I think they might get more takers if it were cheaper... $28 is a weird number that's too close to $30, which is expensive.  Maybe if they could separate it to add free forum for a lower price, but keep ads on the main page?  Also, I never ever use the deals links, they're almost exclusively American only anyway...

 

Anyway, this is probably the wrong place for this discussion, apologies to the OP and mods for side-tracking it.  

On 20/01/2025 at 15:34, FloatingFatMan said:

Monetising websites is a tricky proposition at the best of times... People are used to stuff being free so it's hard to get them to go for paid subs... Honestly, if it were say $19.99 a year for a level 2, I'd sub up as that seems a far more reasonable amount to me, hence me saying I think they might get more takers if it were cheaper... $28 is a weird number that's too close to $30, which is expensive.  Maybe if they could separate it to add free forum for a lower price, but keep ads on the main page?  Also, I never ever use the deals links, they're almost exclusively American only anyway...

 

Anyway, this is probably the wrong place for this discussion, apologies to the OP and mods for side-tracking it.  

I just looked at the pricing.  That's more than a streaming service. 

On 21/01/2025 at 05:34, FloatingFatMan said:

Monetising websites is a tricky proposition at the best of times... People are used to stuff being free so it's hard to get them to go for paid subs... Honestly, if it were say $19.99 a year for a level 2, I'd sub up as that seems a far more reasonable amount to me, hence me saying I think they might get more takers if it were cheaper... $28 is a weird number that's too close to $30, which is expensive.  Maybe if they could separate it to add free forum for a lower price, but keep ads on the main page?  Also, I never ever use the deals links, they're almost exclusively American only anyway...

 

Anyway, this is probably the wrong place for this discussion, apologies to the OP and mods for side-tracking it.  

Have you ever been called a tight ass, a cheap skate, a skinflint or a mercenary sod?

On 20/01/2025 at 22:17, FloatingFatMan said:

 Given how much time I spend here (I never close my browser so just leave the site open), maybe they get more out of me for ad revenue? ;)

You answered your own question, you admitted that we probably get more ad revenue out of you than we could recoup from a yearly $28 subscription. So with that said, I really appreciate that you whitelist Neowin :) 

 

On 21/01/2025 at 08:20, DramaInc said:

I just looked at the pricing.  That's more than a streaming service. 

What streaming service do you use that's less than $28 a year?

Our monthly running costs are in the five figures, and that is without expensive U.S. based journalists (which we can no longer afford).

It's always comical to read how people expect everything to be free, when the reality of the situation is exactly the opposite.

  • Like 2
On 21/01/2025 at 11:14, Steven P. said:

You answered your own question, you admitted that we probably get more ad revenue out of you than we could recoup from a yearly $28 subscription. So with that said, I really appreciate that you whitelist Neowin :) 

Y'know, I was thinking about this last night and I decided to renew my sub (because I can't turn off the adblocker when I'm on my work machine) BUT, for tier one, so you get $14 from me AND the ad revenue! :p 

I still think you might get more subs with a lower tier 2 price though. ;) 

On 21/01/2025 at 12:30, FloatingFatMan said:

Y'know, I was thinking about this last night and I decided to renew my sub (because I can't turn off the adblocker when I'm on my work machine) BUT, for tier one, so you get $14 from me AND the ad revenue! :p 

49079042456_4f926cb8a8.jpg

I hear you on the tier 2 price, but it has actually been that way for almost 20 years, difference is that we actually haven't raised it...

I just look at all the other sites that have folded or have been taken over by Venture Capitalist's, (with people claiming "had I known, I would have done more" ya right lol)  it's a wonder we're still around really!

  • Like 2
On 21/01/2025 at 07:20, DramaInc said:

I just looked at the pricing.  That's more than a streaming service. 

No it's not? I'm paying about £20 per month for my Netflix subscription. A Neowin subscription is either $14 or $28 per year.

  • Like 3
On 21/01/2025 at 22:37, Steven P. said:

49079042456_4f926cb8a8.jpg

I hear you on the tier 2 price, but it has actually been that way for almost 20 years, difference is that we actually haven't raised it...

I just look at all the other sites that have folded or have been taken over by Venture Capitalist's, (with people claiming "had I known, I would have done more" ya right lol)  it's a wonder we're still around really!

Neowin is way less expensive than Ars or Thurrott for example.

Ars is excellent imo but Thurrott uses a ridiculous moderation filter. It's comment section is a joke.

Your subscription cost is very reasonable PLUS you offer forums that allow robust discussion.

For me personally, Neowin sub and YouTube Premium, given l use YT Music as my music streaming service, are my two no brainer subscriptions.

  • Thanks 2
On 22/01/2025 at 06:12, cooky560 said:

While this is true, if I paid $2.33 a month to every site I use, that'd be more than I pay for my broadband.

You've cherry picked one sentence out of my reply.

You have left out the overall context of the value FFM gets from Neowin.

Obviously, l wasn't suggesting we pay for every site we visit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!