James Gunn's Superman (DCU) - 2025


Recommended Posts

I'm anchored - will have to stream, whenever :(

Family really enjoyed it. and it shows the  essential Superman characteristics 

Selflessness 

Empathetic

Never give up

He's sometimes corny, a Kansas country boy at heart. Gosh, golly, etc.

There is humor

Christopher Reeve had them, and now it appears David Corenswet has them too.  

  • Like 3

Superman’ smashes box office expectations, soaring towards $130 million opening

https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/12/business/superman-box-office-opening

 

You could say that it had a super opening. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
On 13/07/2025 at 04:39, Xenon said:

Superman’ smashes box office expectations, soaring towards $130 million opening

https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/12/business/superman-box-office-opening

 

You could say that it had a super opening. 

Good, I hope it makes it to $1billion so the haters can go crawl under their self-made rocks until the next DC movie comes up, supergirl in this case, and we hear from them again probably.

  • Like 3

Saw it last night; it was OK; maybe 6 out of 10. I'm not familiar enough with the comics to be familiar with the other Justice Gang characters or the pocket universe so that part was boring. Its really just rehashing the same tired concepts, Lois, evil Lex, Daily Planet. They just updated it with stuff about selfies, Jimmy Olsen posting stuff on the web, and the dog, etc. David Corenswet will be the second most likeable after Christopher Reeve. Unfortunately I'm old enough to have seen the original 1950's TV shows so this doesn't do much for me. Zack Snyder did it better.

On 13/07/2025 at 16:04, dwd999 said:

Saw it last night; it was OK; maybe 6 out of 10. I'm not familiar enough with the comics to be familiar with the other Justice Gang characters or the pocket universe so that part was boring. Its really just rehashing the same tired concepts, Lois, evil Lex, Daily Planet. They just updated it with stuff about selfies, Jimmy Olsen posting stuff on the web, and the dog, etc. 

Krypto was introduced in 1955. 

On 13/07/2025 at 16:04, dwd999 said:

David Corenswet will be the second most likeable after Christopher Reeve. Unfortunately I'm old enough to have seen the original 1950's TV shows so this doesn't do much for me. Zack Snyder did it better.

No, he didn't. He took the tone of Nolan's Dark Knight trilogy and tried to apply it to Superman - which traditionally has a completely different approach.

The old nickname for Superman was the Big Blue Boy Scout, which Snyder completely ignored. Note that in this film Green Lantern calls Superman Big Blue. That was not an accident.

Also remember that Clark Kent was raised by Methodists, Jonathan and Martha Kent. Methodists are big on doing good works.

Edited by DocM
  • Like 2
On 14/07/2025 at 01:57, DocM said:

Krypto was introduced in 1955. 

No, he didn't. He took the tone of Nolan's Dark Knight trilogy and tried to apply it to Superman - which traditionally has a completely different approach.

The old nickname for Superman was the Big Blue Boy Scout, which Snyder completely ignored. Note that in this film Green Lantern calls Superman Big Blue. That was not an accident.

Also remember that Clark Kent was raised by Methodists, Jonathan and Martha Kent. Methodists are big on doing good works.

Pretty spot on, this vs MoS is night and day.  Only thing I think Zack got right is the super fast fighting elements.  But that's more his style of film making.

  • Like 3

I'm also surprised at how many people did not know about Krypto

Krypton had a canine breed similar to Jack Russell terriers; 250 kt of energy with a rocket stuck up its ass and no sense of responsibility.

Both Jor--El*  and his brother Zor-El** have been depicted as using Krypto as test subject on a prototype flight of their child's escape pod. Neither made it back to Krypton before it was destroyed. 

 * Father of Kal-El/Clark Kent/Superman

** Father of Kara Zor-El/Kara (or Linda) Danvers/Supergirl   

 

  • Like 1
  • Love 2
On 13/07/2025 at 07:09, Xenon said:

Superman’ smashes box office expectations, soaring towards $130 million opening

https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/12/business/superman-box-office-opening

 

You could say that it had a super opening. 

doing poorly internationally at many places :( 

On 14/07/2025 at 15:34, hellowalkman said:

doing poorly internationally at many places :( 

Want a mindbender? Try the series Superman: Red Son

Superman lands in Ukraine, not Kansas 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superman:_Red_Son

 

Final weekend numbers are in, $125mil domestic, $220mil global.  Solid start, and the review scores are holding/stable as well, even better.  Now to see what sort of legs it has.

Even if it doesn't hit $1bil, it's a success IMO.  I expect around the $700m mark at least.

  • Like 2
On 14/07/2025 at 23:46, DocM said:

Want a mindbender? Try the series Superman: Red Son

Superman lands in Ukraine, not Kansas 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superman:_Red_Son

 

The comic series that is, the TV movie just didn’t quite hit home for me

I saw it on opening day... it's good, but I was disappointed that it was such a James Gunn movie.  I think I just expected something else, something more, something a touch more serious... even while knowing who was directing it and his style.  It's absolutely worth seeing on the big screen.

I did not like this movie. This movie had level of unseriousness about this movie that the other Superman movies did not have. Seemed to me that the heroes were the comic relief. I would have rather seen another Cavill movie. 4 out of 10.

Spoiler

Supergirl is a druggie. What is up with that?

 

On 14/07/2025 at 18:46, DocM said:

Want a mindbender? Try the series Superman: Red Son

Superman lands in Ukraine, not Kansas 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superman:_Red_Son

 

Red Son is one of my favorite comics. The way that superman and lex as president are written is amazing. Damn. Now I am gonna have to read that today. So much for cleaning. 

Typically, a film’s stars earn the top salaries. But in this case, Gunn was by far the highest earner, pulling down 20 times more than David Corenswet (Superman/Clark Kent) and Rachel Brosnahan (Lois Lane), who each earned $750,000 to Gunn’s $15 million, according to sources (Gunn also draws a seven-figure salary as the studio’s top executive).

And Nicholas Hoult, who plays archvillain Lex Luthor, nabbed a $2 million payday. Although Warner Bros. has sequel options on Corenswet and Brosnahan, a sequel announcement does not appear to be imminent. Instead, sources say the studio is fast-tracking a “Wonder Woman” movie. And the studio is thrilled with Matt Reeves’ just-submitted screenplay draft for the sequel to “The Batman.”

A New Day for DC: Breaking Down ‘Superman’ Salaries, Budgets and More as Studio Fast-Tracks ‘Wonder Woman’ and Its Future

By 

Tatiana Siegel

Jul 16, 2025 9:30am PT

https://variety.com/2025/film/news/superman-success-budget-cast-salaries-1236462393/

On 13/07/2025 at 10:44, George P said:

Good, I hope it makes it to $1billion so the haters can go crawl under their self-made rocks until the next DC movie comes up, supergirl in this case, and we hear from them again probably.

I really don't get why people are hating on it.  I've not seen it myself so don't really have an opinion yet, but are they hating on it because it's a bad movie, or are they just raging because Cavil was replaced?

I wasn't personally SUPER ( ;) ) impressed by the trailer, and I'm rather sick of superhero movies now,  but I'm not going to hate on a movie until I've seen it at least... Sadly that will have to wait until it reaches digital or blu ray release as I can't do cinemas...

  • Like 2
On 16/07/2025 at 22:41, FloatingFatMan said:

I really don't get why people are hating on it.  I've not seen it myself so don't really have an opinion yet, but are they hating on it because it's a bad movie, or are they just raging because Cavil was replaced?

I wasn't personally SUPER ( ;) ) impressed by the trailer, and I'm rather sick of superhero movies now,  but I'm not going to hate on a movie until I've seen it at least... Sadly that will have to wait until it reaches digital or blu ray release as I can't do cinemas...

I don't know, I think it's just hold outs from the Snyder fans having a hissy fit.  If you go with the scores, it's a solid movie.   

On 16/07/2025 at 21:28, Alpha_Tay said:

Typically, a film’s stars earn the top salaries. But in this case, Gunn was by far the highest earner, pulling down 20 times more than David Corenswet (Superman/Clark Kent) and Rachel Brosnahan (Lois Lane), who each earned $750,000 to Gunn’s $15 million, according to sources (Gunn also draws a seven-figure salary as the studio’s top executive).

And Nicholas Hoult, who plays archvillain Lex Luthor, nabbed a $2 million payday. Although Warner Bros. has sequel options on Corenswet and Brosnahan, a sequel announcement does not appear to be imminent. Instead, sources say the studio is fast-tracking a “Wonder Woman” movie. And the studio is thrilled with Matt Reeves’ just-submitted screenplay draft for the sequel to “The Batman.”

A New Day for DC: Breaking Down ‘Superman’ Salaries, Budgets and More as Studio Fast-Tracks ‘Wonder Woman’ and Its Future

By 

Tatiana Siegel

Jul 16, 2025 9:30am PT

https://variety.com/2025/film/news/superman-success-budget-cast-salaries-1236462393/

David and Rachel aren't A listers when it comes to movies.  Rachels big success till now was in TV.    Regardless, this is how most started out, look at the first deals the MCU stars got, (yes even RDJ for the first round of Iron Man movies), and you'll see that they're always paid low and if it does well and kicks off a franchise they'll be in for at least a few more movies.  And they'll be making more in each etc.

Nothing new here.

I also fully expect a Superman sequel sooner rather than later, Gunn isn't going to rush to do a JL like before and screw things up IMO.   WW next makes sense, followed by Batman.  But between that WW and Batman movie I expect another Superman film.

On 17/07/2025 at 10:27, George P said:

I don't know, I think it's just hold outs from the Snyder fans having a hissy fit.  If you go with the scores, it's a solid movie.   

So, I watched it last night at my very local "cinema"... ;) 

I didn't hate this.  It was way more comicy than previous attempts at DC universe movies and the monsters were VERY over comicy but worked well within the movie itself. The nods to the Reeves movie were nice and I quite liked that he wasn't muscle bound.

It wasn't perfect of course.  Comic version Krypto was always the goodest of good boys, not an out of control little ######... :p  and the Supergirl bit at the end? Hard pass there... Otherwise though, it was an enjoyable movie that gave us a lot of characters we've not seen brought to the screen before and best of all WASN'T an origin story...

So, personally, I give it a solid 7/10.

On 17/07/2025 at 10:32, George P said:

I also fully expect a Superman sequel sooner rather than later, Gunn isn't going to rush to do a JL like before and screw things up IMO.   WW next makes sense, followed by Batman.  But between that WW and Batman movie I expect another Superman film.

You know what I'd like to see?  A Mr Terrific or a Hawk Girl movie... Maybe even a proper Green Lantern movie that no one actually despises.... :p   Enough of the same old supers, time and time again... I have a feeling Gunn is going to lean towards something in that area too given the exposition in the opening...

On 16/07/2025 at 20:41, FloatingFatMan said:

I really don't get why people are hating on it.  I've not seen it myself so don't really have an opinion yet, but are they hating on it because it's a bad movie, or are they just raging because Cavil was replaced?

I wasn't personally SUPER ( ;) ) impressed by the trailer, and I'm rather sick of superhero movies now,  but I'm not going to hate on a movie until I've seen it at least... Sadly that will have to wait until it reaches digital or blu ray release as I can't do cinemas...

well there is a *cough* conspiracy in it about a certain country committing war crimes, with strong influences,  allegedly being represented in the film, but maybe i'm just being paranoid

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!