James Gunn's Superman (DCU) - 2025


Recommended Posts

I'm anchored - will have to stream, whenever :(

Family really enjoyed it. and it shows the  essential Superman characteristics 

Selflessness 

Empathetic

Never give up

He's sometimes corny, a Kansas country boy at heart. Gosh, golly, etc.

There is humor

Christopher Reeve had them, and now it appears David Corenswet has them too.  

  • Like 3

Superman’ smashes box office expectations, soaring towards $130 million opening

https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/12/business/superman-box-office-opening

 

You could say that it had a super opening. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
On 13/07/2025 at 04:39, Xenon said:

Superman’ smashes box office expectations, soaring towards $130 million opening

https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/12/business/superman-box-office-opening

 

You could say that it had a super opening. 

Good, I hope it makes it to $1billion so the haters can go crawl under their self-made rocks until the next DC movie comes up, supergirl in this case, and we hear from them again probably.

  • Like 3

Saw it last night; it was OK; maybe 6 out of 10. I'm not familiar enough with the comics to be familiar with the other Justice Gang characters or the pocket universe so that part was boring. Its really just rehashing the same tired concepts, Lois, evil Lex, Daily Planet. They just updated it with stuff about selfies, Jimmy Olsen posting stuff on the web, and the dog, etc. David Corenswet will be the second most likeable after Christopher Reeve. Unfortunately I'm old enough to have seen the original 1950's TV shows so this doesn't do much for me. Zack Snyder did it better.

On 13/07/2025 at 16:04, dwd999 said:

Saw it last night; it was OK; maybe 6 out of 10. I'm not familiar enough with the comics to be familiar with the other Justice Gang characters or the pocket universe so that part was boring. Its really just rehashing the same tired concepts, Lois, evil Lex, Daily Planet. They just updated it with stuff about selfies, Jimmy Olsen posting stuff on the web, and the dog, etc. 

Krypto was introduced in 1955. 

On 13/07/2025 at 16:04, dwd999 said:

David Corenswet will be the second most likeable after Christopher Reeve. Unfortunately I'm old enough to have seen the original 1950's TV shows so this doesn't do much for me. Zack Snyder did it better.

No, he didn't. He took the tone of Nolan's Dark Knight trilogy and tried to apply it to Superman - which traditionally has a completely different approach.

The old nickname for Superman was the Big Blue Boy Scout, which Snyder completely ignored. Note that in this film Green Lantern calls Superman Big Blue. That was not an accident.

Also remember that Clark Kent was raised by Methodists, Jonathan and Martha Kent. Methodists are big on doing good works.

Edited by DocM
  • Like 2
On 14/07/2025 at 01:57, DocM said:

Krypto was introduced in 1955. 

No, he didn't. He took the tone of Nolan's Dark Knight trilogy and tried to apply it to Superman - which traditionally has a completely different approach.

The old nickname for Superman was the Big Blue Boy Scout, which Snyder completely ignored. Note that in this film Green Lantern calls Superman Big Blue. That was not an accident.

Also remember that Clark Kent was raised by Methodists, Jonathan and Martha Kent. Methodists are big on doing good works.

Pretty spot on, this vs MoS is night and day.  Only thing I think Zack got right is the super fast fighting elements.  But that's more his style of film making.

  • Like 3

I'm also surprised at how many people did not know about Krypto

Krypton had a canine breed similar to Jack Russell terriers; 250 kt of energy with a rocket stuck up its ass and no sense of responsibility.

Both Jor--El*  and his brother Zor-El** have been depicted as using Krypto as test subject on a prototype flight of their child's escape pod. Neither made it back to Krypton before it was destroyed. 

 * Father of Kal-El/Clark Kent/Superman

** Father of Kara Zor-El/Kara (or Linda) Danvers/Supergirl   

 

  • Like 1
  • Love 2
On 13/07/2025 at 07:09, Xenon said:

Superman’ smashes box office expectations, soaring towards $130 million opening

https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/12/business/superman-box-office-opening

 

You could say that it had a super opening. 

doing poorly internationally at many places :( 

On 14/07/2025 at 15:34, hellowalkman said:

doing poorly internationally at many places :( 

Want a mindbender? Try the series Superman: Red Son

Superman lands in Ukraine, not Kansas 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superman:_Red_Son

 

Final weekend numbers are in, $125mil domestic, $220mil global.  Solid start, and the review scores are holding/stable as well, even better.  Now to see what sort of legs it has.

Even if it doesn't hit $1bil, it's a success IMO.  I expect around the $700m mark at least.

  • Like 2
On 14/07/2025 at 23:46, DocM said:

Want a mindbender? Try the series Superman: Red Son

Superman lands in Ukraine, not Kansas 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superman:_Red_Son

 

The comic series that is, the TV movie just didn’t quite hit home for me

I saw it on opening day... it's good, but I was disappointed that it was such a James Gunn movie.  I think I just expected something else, something more, something a touch more serious... even while knowing who was directing it and his style.  It's absolutely worth seeing on the big screen.

I did not like this movie. This movie had level of unseriousness about this movie that the other Superman movies did not have. Seemed to me that the heroes were the comic relief. I would have rather seen another Cavill movie. 4 out of 10.

Spoiler

Supergirl is a druggie. What is up with that?

 

On 14/07/2025 at 18:46, DocM said:

Want a mindbender? Try the series Superman: Red Son

Superman lands in Ukraine, not Kansas 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superman:_Red_Son

 

Red Son is one of my favorite comics. The way that superman and lex as president are written is amazing. Damn. Now I am gonna have to read that today. So much for cleaning. 

Typically, a film’s stars earn the top salaries. But in this case, Gunn was by far the highest earner, pulling down 20 times more than David Corenswet (Superman/Clark Kent) and Rachel Brosnahan (Lois Lane), who each earned $750,000 to Gunn’s $15 million, according to sources (Gunn also draws a seven-figure salary as the studio’s top executive).

And Nicholas Hoult, who plays archvillain Lex Luthor, nabbed a $2 million payday. Although Warner Bros. has sequel options on Corenswet and Brosnahan, a sequel announcement does not appear to be imminent. Instead, sources say the studio is fast-tracking a “Wonder Woman” movie. And the studio is thrilled with Matt Reeves’ just-submitted screenplay draft for the sequel to “The Batman.”

A New Day for DC: Breaking Down ‘Superman’ Salaries, Budgets and More as Studio Fast-Tracks ‘Wonder Woman’ and Its Future

By 

Tatiana Siegel

Jul 16, 2025 9:30am PT

https://variety.com/2025/film/news/superman-success-budget-cast-salaries-1236462393/

On 13/07/2025 at 10:44, George P said:

Good, I hope it makes it to $1billion so the haters can go crawl under their self-made rocks until the next DC movie comes up, supergirl in this case, and we hear from them again probably.

I really don't get why people are hating on it.  I've not seen it myself so don't really have an opinion yet, but are they hating on it because it's a bad movie, or are they just raging because Cavil was replaced?

I wasn't personally SUPER ( ;) ) impressed by the trailer, and I'm rather sick of superhero movies now,  but I'm not going to hate on a movie until I've seen it at least... Sadly that will have to wait until it reaches digital or blu ray release as I can't do cinemas...

  • Like 2
On 16/07/2025 at 22:41, FloatingFatMan said:

I really don't get why people are hating on it.  I've not seen it myself so don't really have an opinion yet, but are they hating on it because it's a bad movie, or are they just raging because Cavil was replaced?

I wasn't personally SUPER ( ;) ) impressed by the trailer, and I'm rather sick of superhero movies now,  but I'm not going to hate on a movie until I've seen it at least... Sadly that will have to wait until it reaches digital or blu ray release as I can't do cinemas...

I don't know, I think it's just hold outs from the Snyder fans having a hissy fit.  If you go with the scores, it's a solid movie.   

On 16/07/2025 at 21:28, Alpha_Tay said:

Typically, a film’s stars earn the top salaries. But in this case, Gunn was by far the highest earner, pulling down 20 times more than David Corenswet (Superman/Clark Kent) and Rachel Brosnahan (Lois Lane), who each earned $750,000 to Gunn’s $15 million, according to sources (Gunn also draws a seven-figure salary as the studio’s top executive).

And Nicholas Hoult, who plays archvillain Lex Luthor, nabbed a $2 million payday. Although Warner Bros. has sequel options on Corenswet and Brosnahan, a sequel announcement does not appear to be imminent. Instead, sources say the studio is fast-tracking a “Wonder Woman” movie. And the studio is thrilled with Matt Reeves’ just-submitted screenplay draft for the sequel to “The Batman.”

A New Day for DC: Breaking Down ‘Superman’ Salaries, Budgets and More as Studio Fast-Tracks ‘Wonder Woman’ and Its Future

By 

Tatiana Siegel

Jul 16, 2025 9:30am PT

https://variety.com/2025/film/news/superman-success-budget-cast-salaries-1236462393/

David and Rachel aren't A listers when it comes to movies.  Rachels big success till now was in TV.    Regardless, this is how most started out, look at the first deals the MCU stars got, (yes even RDJ for the first round of Iron Man movies), and you'll see that they're always paid low and if it does well and kicks off a franchise they'll be in for at least a few more movies.  And they'll be making more in each etc.

Nothing new here.

I also fully expect a Superman sequel sooner rather than later, Gunn isn't going to rush to do a JL like before and screw things up IMO.   WW next makes sense, followed by Batman.  But between that WW and Batman movie I expect another Superman film.

On 17/07/2025 at 10:27, George P said:

I don't know, I think it's just hold outs from the Snyder fans having a hissy fit.  If you go with the scores, it's a solid movie.   

So, I watched it last night at my very local "cinema"... ;) 

I didn't hate this.  It was way more comicy than previous attempts at DC universe movies and the monsters were VERY over comicy but worked well within the movie itself. The nods to the Reeves movie were nice and I quite liked that he wasn't muscle bound.

It wasn't perfect of course.  Comic version Krypto was always the goodest of good boys, not an out of control little ######... :p  and the Supergirl bit at the end? Hard pass there... Otherwise though, it was an enjoyable movie that gave us a lot of characters we've not seen brought to the screen before and best of all WASN'T an origin story...

So, personally, I give it a solid 7/10.

On 17/07/2025 at 10:32, George P said:

I also fully expect a Superman sequel sooner rather than later, Gunn isn't going to rush to do a JL like before and screw things up IMO.   WW next makes sense, followed by Batman.  But between that WW and Batman movie I expect another Superman film.

You know what I'd like to see?  A Mr Terrific or a Hawk Girl movie... Maybe even a proper Green Lantern movie that no one actually despises.... :p   Enough of the same old supers, time and time again... I have a feeling Gunn is going to lean towards something in that area too given the exposition in the opening...

On 16/07/2025 at 20:41, FloatingFatMan said:

I really don't get why people are hating on it.  I've not seen it myself so don't really have an opinion yet, but are they hating on it because it's a bad movie, or are they just raging because Cavil was replaced?

I wasn't personally SUPER ( ;) ) impressed by the trailer, and I'm rather sick of superhero movies now,  but I'm not going to hate on a movie until I've seen it at least... Sadly that will have to wait until it reaches digital or blu ray release as I can't do cinemas...

well there is a *cough* conspiracy in it about a certain country committing war crimes, with strong influences,  allegedly being represented in the film, but maybe i'm just being paranoid

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!