James Gunn's Superman (DCU) - 2025


Recommended Posts

On 17/07/2025 at 13:39, FloatingFatMan said:

You know what I'd like to see?  A Mr Terrific or a Hawk Girl movie... Maybe even a proper Green Lantern movie that no one actually despises.... :p   Enough of the same old supers, time and time again... I have a feeling Gunn is going to lean towards something in that area too given the exposition in the opening...

There's rumors that a Mr Terrific movie is on the way but we'll have to wait and see.  There's also the GL TV series coming, that should lead into a bigger GL movie I expect. 

  • Like 2
On 17/07/2025 at 10:38, George P said:

There's rumors that a Mr Terrific movie is on the way but we'll have to wait and see.  There's also the GL TV series coming, that should lead into a bigger GL movie I expect. 

I think Guy Gardner will be in the GL series as well, https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/lantern-nathan-fillion-guy-gardner-hbo-series-1236353007/

  • Like 2
On 15/07/2025 at 17:08, hagjohn said:

I did not like this movie. This movie had level of unseriousness about this movie that the other Superman movies did not have. Seemed to me that the heroes were the comic relief. I would have rather seen another Cavill movie. 4 out of 10.

 

I feel kinda similar. I don't think Man of Steel was flawless, it has plenty of issues (one of them certainly being a bit too dark, at least at times), but I do re-watch it from time to time and mostly enjoy it. I feel like it is the best of Snyder's DC movies by a fair bit.

This one felt weird to me - a bit too...I don't know, would "whimsical" be a good word to describe it (not a native speaker)? It does a lot correctly for sure, but overall comes off too... "Gunn-y". I feel like a Superman movie deserves a bit more seriousness than something like Gunn's Suicide Squad or Peacemaker. It seems like Gunn is leaning quite a bit into the more lighthearted side of Superman (and DC in general), whereas I seem to prefer the more serious one. The original two with Reeve were pretty spot on in that regard (despite awkward time travel ;) ).

But clearly it has been a welcome change for many, so more power to them and to Gunn, I guess :)

  • Like 2
On 17/07/2025 at 11:32, primortal said:

Guy Gardner is the new Jar Jar Binks. I do not get the appeal.

This is the Superman film I had been waiting for. The tone was fine, yes a little more “fun” than previous outings but a lot of that came from supporting characters. Krypto was well handled, and somehow managed to not be an annoying distraction and actually a valid part of the story. Hoult was GREAT as Luthor. Genuinely so happy that this wasn’t crap.

I personally enjoyed Superman Returns, despite its flaws (tried too much to hide behind the older movies, had no real fight to Superman). I enjoyed the Man Of Steel movies despite their flaws (totally that is NOT Superman). But this - this is the film I had wanted.

In the UK we are far more reserved in cinemas than Americans. It’s rare that there is the whooping and hollering that we have seen from videos of US theatres, so when I say that the audience clapped at the end of this - it’s quite a big deal.

As for all this “Superman has gone woke” BS - he is freaking Superman and if at any point in that movie you found yourself pooh-pooing his actions, you are just - you’re aligning your thinking with the problems and not the solutions. I adore how the movie addressed the modern world through thinly veiled allegory (Israel, online bots, perceptions of people, how they change on a dime) - that is maybe one of the greatest strengths of  comics, they rarely pull punches with that sort of thing, and look, THIS IS SUPERMAN, he’s meant to be the global boyscout and that is a strength and where he falls down sometimes, that’s just who he is and who he is meant to be. I also am glad there was no reference to the worldwide joke that is “Truth, Justice and the American way”.

I can understand the comment suggesting this film was a little too “fun” or “whimsical”, but I’d urge a rewatch of the Donner Superman. It was very much a flawed masterpiece and its subsequent sequel had too many jokes that didn’t land. While there was a lot of James Gunn in this movie, I feel he pulled it back significantly, it wasn’t Guardians and moreover a lot of the fun came from supporting roles.

  • Like 2
On 19/07/2025 at 16:00, hagjohn said:

Guy Gardner is the new Jar Jar Binks. I do not get the appeal.

Disagreed, I feel it’s going somewhere and his role served a purpose - and moreover with maybe what 10 mins of screen time - he had a bit of character development also.

  • Like 1
On 20/07/2025 at 11:17, Nik Louch said:

While there was a lot of James Gunn in this movie, I feel he pulled it back significantly, it wasn’t Guardians and moreover a lot of the fun came from supporting roles.

I would agree with most of this, though I still feel like there was a bit too much of the "Guardians" type of thing. But yes, despite that, he clearly pulled it back a fair bit and yes, most of it came from supporting roles.

And no, I too don't really see the appeal of Fillion's Guy Gardner, apart from the fact that people have been asking for it for ages and it's Fillion, so of course everyone goes crazy. I had no idea a TV show is planned, but we'll see how it turns out. (Also, I frankly feel like Fillion is getting a bit too old for the role and doesn't really fit it anymore.)

On 21/07/2025 at 09:17, hellowalkman said:

I watched it this week, I really liked it too. Just wish the run-time was a bit longer coz it would have helped some scenes flesh out better. Overall 8.5 out of 10 for me.

That's the only thing many who liked it said, it could've been another 15mins, maybe even 30mins longer.  Makes me wonder if we're going to get a extended release later for streaming/bluray.

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
On 21/07/2025 at 07:43, Case_f said:

And no, I too don't really see the appeal of Fillion's Guy Gardner

The character was a foil for Superman, to show the difference in how the metahumans act as opposed to how he does.  It feels (to me) like this is the first seed of Kingdom Come.

  • Like 2
On 21/07/2025 at 07:43, Case_f said:

And no, I too don't really see the appeal of Fillion's Guy Gardner, apart from the fact that people have been asking for it for ages and it's Fillion, so of course everyone goes crazy. I had no idea a TV show is planned, but we'll see how it turns out. (Also, I frankly feel like Fillion is getting a bit too old for the role and doesn't really fit it anymore.)

I agree on Fillion's age. Good actor, but too old for this role IMO.  As for Gardner the character, remember that he's MEANT to be a complete a-hole.  Always has been, always will be. :p 

  • Like 3

When I say I don't see the appeal, I meant as in general, of the character within the story. I guess apart from being a foil, as mentioned, but I still feel it could probably be done a bit more...less on the nose? A bit more nuanced? Something like that. He really just felt more like a chance to cast Fillion more than anything (to me, anyway).

Obviously I am aware that Guy Gardner is not exactly meant to be an *appealing* character :)

On 22/07/2025 at 08:30, Case_f said:

A bit more nuanced?

I get where you're coming from by Fillion played the role perfectly IMO.  His age didn't factor into it for me, not once did I see him on screen and think "nah too old".  But he's not meant to be nuanced, and let's be fair this is a blockbuster superhero movie, nuance isn't a thing.

  • Like 1
On 22/07/2025 at 10:35, Nik Louch said:

I get where you're coming from by Fillion played the role perfectly IMO.  His age didn't factor into it for me, not once did I see him on screen and think "nah too old".  But he's not meant to be nuanced, and let's be fair this is a blockbuster superhero movie, nuance isn't a thing.

To be completely honest, the wig/hairdo distracted me from everything Fillion was doing as GL... :p

  • Haha 3
  • 2 weeks later...
On 04/08/2025 at 07:46, Matthew S. said:

What in the actual ... was this crap, just saw this tonight, good zodd wtf...

Yeah I wasn't impressed either.

Muddled story that went all over the place.
They made him look weak, Superman got beat up by pretty much every single baddie in the movie.
Multiple jokes that were driven into the ground, we get it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!