James Gunn's Superman (DCU) - 2025


Recommended Posts

On 17/07/2025 at 13:39, FloatingFatMan said:

You know what I'd like to see?  A Mr Terrific or a Hawk Girl movie... Maybe even a proper Green Lantern movie that no one actually despises.... :p   Enough of the same old supers, time and time again... I have a feeling Gunn is going to lean towards something in that area too given the exposition in the opening...

There's rumors that a Mr Terrific movie is on the way but we'll have to wait and see.  There's also the GL TV series coming, that should lead into a bigger GL movie I expect. 

  • Like 2
On 17/07/2025 at 10:38, George P said:

There's rumors that a Mr Terrific movie is on the way but we'll have to wait and see.  There's also the GL TV series coming, that should lead into a bigger GL movie I expect. 

I think Guy Gardner will be in the GL series as well, https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/lantern-nathan-fillion-guy-gardner-hbo-series-1236353007/

  • Like 2
On 15/07/2025 at 17:08, hagjohn said:

I did not like this movie. This movie had level of unseriousness about this movie that the other Superman movies did not have. Seemed to me that the heroes were the comic relief. I would have rather seen another Cavill movie. 4 out of 10.

 

I feel kinda similar. I don't think Man of Steel was flawless, it has plenty of issues (one of them certainly being a bit too dark, at least at times), but I do re-watch it from time to time and mostly enjoy it. I feel like it is the best of Snyder's DC movies by a fair bit.

This one felt weird to me - a bit too...I don't know, would "whimsical" be a good word to describe it (not a native speaker)? It does a lot correctly for sure, but overall comes off too... "Gunn-y". I feel like a Superman movie deserves a bit more seriousness than something like Gunn's Suicide Squad or Peacemaker. It seems like Gunn is leaning quite a bit into the more lighthearted side of Superman (and DC in general), whereas I seem to prefer the more serious one. The original two with Reeve were pretty spot on in that regard (despite awkward time travel ;) ).

But clearly it has been a welcome change for many, so more power to them and to Gunn, I guess :)

  • Like 2
On 17/07/2025 at 11:32, primortal said:

Guy Gardner is the new Jar Jar Binks. I do not get the appeal.

This is the Superman film I had been waiting for. The tone was fine, yes a little more “fun” than previous outings but a lot of that came from supporting characters. Krypto was well handled, and somehow managed to not be an annoying distraction and actually a valid part of the story. Hoult was GREAT as Luthor. Genuinely so happy that this wasn’t crap.

I personally enjoyed Superman Returns, despite its flaws (tried too much to hide behind the older movies, had no real fight to Superman). I enjoyed the Man Of Steel movies despite their flaws (totally that is NOT Superman). But this - this is the film I had wanted.

In the UK we are far more reserved in cinemas than Americans. It’s rare that there is the whooping and hollering that we have seen from videos of US theatres, so when I say that the audience clapped at the end of this - it’s quite a big deal.

As for all this “Superman has gone woke” BS - he is freaking Superman and if at any point in that movie you found yourself pooh-pooing his actions, you are just - you’re aligning your thinking with the problems and not the solutions. I adore how the movie addressed the modern world through thinly veiled allegory (Israel, online bots, perceptions of people, how they change on a dime) - that is maybe one of the greatest strengths of  comics, they rarely pull punches with that sort of thing, and look, THIS IS SUPERMAN, he’s meant to be the global boyscout and that is a strength and where he falls down sometimes, that’s just who he is and who he is meant to be. I also am glad there was no reference to the worldwide joke that is “Truth, Justice and the American way”.

I can understand the comment suggesting this film was a little too “fun” or “whimsical”, but I’d urge a rewatch of the Donner Superman. It was very much a flawed masterpiece and its subsequent sequel had too many jokes that didn’t land. While there was a lot of James Gunn in this movie, I feel he pulled it back significantly, it wasn’t Guardians and moreover a lot of the fun came from supporting roles.

  • Like 2
On 19/07/2025 at 16:00, hagjohn said:

Guy Gardner is the new Jar Jar Binks. I do not get the appeal.

Disagreed, I feel it’s going somewhere and his role served a purpose - and moreover with maybe what 10 mins of screen time - he had a bit of character development also.

  • Like 1
On 20/07/2025 at 11:17, Nik Louch said:

While there was a lot of James Gunn in this movie, I feel he pulled it back significantly, it wasn’t Guardians and moreover a lot of the fun came from supporting roles.

I would agree with most of this, though I still feel like there was a bit too much of the "Guardians" type of thing. But yes, despite that, he clearly pulled it back a fair bit and yes, most of it came from supporting roles.

And no, I too don't really see the appeal of Fillion's Guy Gardner, apart from the fact that people have been asking for it for ages and it's Fillion, so of course everyone goes crazy. I had no idea a TV show is planned, but we'll see how it turns out. (Also, I frankly feel like Fillion is getting a bit too old for the role and doesn't really fit it anymore.)

On 21/07/2025 at 09:17, hellowalkman said:

I watched it this week, I really liked it too. Just wish the run-time was a bit longer coz it would have helped some scenes flesh out better. Overall 8.5 out of 10 for me.

That's the only thing many who liked it said, it could've been another 15mins, maybe even 30mins longer.  Makes me wonder if we're going to get a extended release later for streaming/bluray.

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
On 21/07/2025 at 07:43, Case_f said:

And no, I too don't really see the appeal of Fillion's Guy Gardner

The character was a foil for Superman, to show the difference in how the metahumans act as opposed to how he does.  It feels (to me) like this is the first seed of Kingdom Come.

  • Like 2
On 21/07/2025 at 07:43, Case_f said:

And no, I too don't really see the appeal of Fillion's Guy Gardner, apart from the fact that people have been asking for it for ages and it's Fillion, so of course everyone goes crazy. I had no idea a TV show is planned, but we'll see how it turns out. (Also, I frankly feel like Fillion is getting a bit too old for the role and doesn't really fit it anymore.)

I agree on Fillion's age. Good actor, but too old for this role IMO.  As for Gardner the character, remember that he's MEANT to be a complete a-hole.  Always has been, always will be. :p 

  • Like 3

When I say I don't see the appeal, I meant as in general, of the character within the story. I guess apart from being a foil, as mentioned, but I still feel it could probably be done a bit more...less on the nose? A bit more nuanced? Something like that. He really just felt more like a chance to cast Fillion more than anything (to me, anyway).

Obviously I am aware that Guy Gardner is not exactly meant to be an *appealing* character :)

On 22/07/2025 at 08:30, Case_f said:

A bit more nuanced?

I get where you're coming from by Fillion played the role perfectly IMO.  His age didn't factor into it for me, not once did I see him on screen and think "nah too old".  But he's not meant to be nuanced, and let's be fair this is a blockbuster superhero movie, nuance isn't a thing.

  • Like 1
On 22/07/2025 at 10:35, Nik Louch said:

I get where you're coming from by Fillion played the role perfectly IMO.  His age didn't factor into it for me, not once did I see him on screen and think "nah too old".  But he's not meant to be nuanced, and let's be fair this is a blockbuster superhero movie, nuance isn't a thing.

To be completely honest, the wig/hairdo distracted me from everything Fillion was doing as GL... :p

  • Haha 3
  • 2 weeks later...
On 04/08/2025 at 07:46, Matthew S. said:

What in the actual ... was this crap, just saw this tonight, good zodd wtf...

Yeah I wasn't impressed either.

Muddled story that went all over the place.
They made him look weak, Superman got beat up by pretty much every single baddie in the movie.
Multiple jokes that were driven into the ground, we get it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!