Not MS fan, just left Linux after 26 years for music production only


Recommended Posts

https://github.com/Raphire/Win11Debloat

 

There are many of these across the interwebs, check Google for more.

Research a bit and be careful, make sure the script or app is reputable.

The best and safest way to debloat a windows iso  is with NTLite....either the free version or the paid one.

There are many other guides and tools but i consider this one the safest

And don't try to debload an already installed OS it's just a waste of time.

Edited by Haxzion

Look at O&O Shutup10++ & O&O App Buster

https://www.oo-software.com/en/shutup10 - Trigger Privacy Settings in mass / granular
https://www.oo-software.com/en/ooappbuster - Safely Uninstalling App Store Apps (it had guard rails)

Also, using powershell commands to remove app store apps work too.

https://www.wisecleaner.com/how-to/174-how-to-uninstall-windows-apps-with-powershell-on-windows-10-and-11.html
Just be careful what you remove.

IMHO most of the tweaking tools for Windows have the potential to break your OS and the sad part is that you wouldn't even know it's broken and blame it on MS when things don't work as they should. Just use the Add/Remove feature on Windows to remove any programs you do not want. Otherwise, the ONLY app I would recommend that removes programs/System Modules/Windows apps and ALL traces of them without breaking stuff is TOTAL UNINSTALL. Not free but worth the purchase.

I also left Windows and stayed on Linux for over 7 years full-time, but VR brought me back around 4 years ago or so lol, and now I'm dual booting again. I have learned not to mess with Windows and just normally remove what I don't want. It's better this way.

sshot-1.png

On 17/01/2025 at 07:09, Accuphase said:

What’s your necessary tool?

Some people like and use Copilot. I don't, so I would consider it bloatware.

 

On 17/01/2025 at 00:32, Elі said:

IMHO most of the tweaking tools for Windows have the potential to break your OS and the sad part is that you wouldn't even know it's broken and blame it on MS when things don't work as they should. Just use the Add/Remove feature on Windows to remove any programs you do not want. Otherwise, the ONLY app I would recommend that removes programs/System Modules/Windows apps and ALL traces of them without breaking stuff is TOTAL UNINSTALL. Not free but worth the purchase.

I also left Windows and stayed on Linux for over 7 years full-time, but VR brought me back around 4 years ago or so lol, and now I'm dual booting again. I have learned not to mess with Windows and just normally remove what I don't want. It's better this way.

Definitely this. I know plenty of people here that use these scripts and tools and that is fine. But if they ask for support and I learn that they used something to "de-bloat" the system I'm less inclined to offer suggestions past "reinstall the OS as it was meant to be."

 

For @hapibeli: Why did you move away from Linux for music production? I can think of several people in that profession that are able to get their work done using Linux, so what is it that wasn't working for you? Was it just the case that the particular application that you use doesn't have native Linux support?

  • Like 2
On 17/01/2025 at 07:09, Accuphase said:

What’s your necessary tool?

Not that it's overly relevant but I've seen scripts that remove:

  • CoPilot
  • Remote Desktop
  • Power Automate
  • Edge

I use these things every single day.  Others may or may not be in the same boat.  So one persons "bloatware" is another's "necessary tool".  A lot of people use these scripts and are ignorant as to what they do, and then blame MS when something doesn't work.

Don't get me wrong, these scripts have a really valid place - and for me, that is an education piece so that I maintain my own script that I run upon spinning up a new instance.

  • Like 2
On 17/01/2025 at 19:50, Nick H. said:

Some people like and use Copilot. I don't, so I would consider it bloatware.

 

Definitely this. I know plenty of people here that use these scripts and tools and that is fine. But if they ask for support and I learn that they used something to "de-bloat" the system I'm less inclined to offer suggestions past "reinstall the OS as it was meant to be."

 

For @hapibeli: Why did you move away from Linux for music production? I can think of several people in that profession that are able to get their work done using Linux, so what is it that wasn't working for you? Was it just the case that the particular application that you use doesn't have native Linux support?

Linux doesn’t have the Steinberg suite of audio editing apps.

On 18/01/2025 at 01:16, Dick Montage said:

Not that it's overly relevant but I've seen scripts that remove:

  • CoPilot
  • Remote Desktop
  • Power Automate
  • Edge

I use these things every single day.  Others may or may not be in the same boat.  So one persons "bloatware" is another's "necessary tool".  A lot of people use these scripts and are ignorant as to what they do, and then blame MS when something doesn't work.

Don't get me wrong, these scripts have a really valid place - and for me, that is an education piece so that I maintain my own script that I run upon spinning up a new instance.

Me too I even run windows 2025 Server and have a ton of Linux/Freebsd and Windows VMs

Hyperv is awesome for what I do and you can even play games via Remote Destop

On 20/01/2025 at 06:48, Phillip Hardy said:

Me too I even run windows 2025 Server and have a ton of Linux/Freebsd and Windows VMs

Hyperv is awesome for what I do and you can even play games via Remote Destop

I wish Hyper-V was better for desktop Linux. It’s always been a pain for me to get a good user experience even with the enhanced session. 

On 20/01/2025 at 05:10, Accuphase said:

Linux doesn’t have the Steinberg suite of audio editing apps.

Are you referring to Cubase? I didn't see where the OP mentioned the application that they were using, hence asking the question. Otherwise you may as well point out that Adobe products and Safari don't work on Linux; while true it has no bearing on the OP's situation.

If the OP has been a Linux user for 25+ years it seems odd that one specific application would pull them over to Windows.

 

On 20/01/2025 at 08:55, Rigby said:

Isn't almost everything easily uninstallable now? Right click, uninstall. Plus what is "bloat" really? With today's massive hard drive's the effect of having these apps installed is completely negligible.

Copilot, Recall...those two are the latest that I can think of that you cannot uninstall through add/remove programs. Also, bloat is anything that uses computer resources (CPU, HDD space, RAM) that you don't use. So in my case, Copilot, Recall...I can't easily remove them, and running a script to get rid of them could have unforseen consequences that affect the stability of Windows. Also, Microsoft would probably just reinstall it with the next update so it's not really worth the hassle.

I guess that last bit is really your point, though. It's not worth the hassle of fighting against Microsoft's decisions. I just use Windows as little as possible instead.

On 21/01/2025 at 01:47, Nick H. said:

If the OP has been a Linux user for 25+ years it seems odd that one specific application would pull them over to Windows.

It's not odd, Applications determine which operating system is required... It's okay to use multiple operating systems depending on the applications you use.

The whole switching OS and picking sides thing is lame af.

I don't use 3rd party tools to remove features in windows.  I just use  get-appxpackage -allusers *app* | remove-appxpackage -allusers   (this to remove currently installed apps on all profiles)

then get-appxProvisionedPackage -online | where-object {$_.Packagename -like "*app*"} | remove-appxprovisionedpackage -online (this to prevent those apps from installing for future users, or when you wipe your profile)

 

Or something like that.  I probably made some spelling errors there, but no real reason to use 3rd party tools.  I use this on enterprise as well.  With enterprise, it helps to use group policy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!