Recommended Posts

I need to access https://secure.ssa.gov/RIL/SiView.action, but I am not able to access it, after some time it says that site is not responding. I have tried 3 different browsers with the same result. Now I have also tried via my cell phone, and it to can not connect. I even pinged the website and it comes back as unreachable. However if I turn off WiFi on my phone and just use mobile data, I can access the site with no issues. I have done everything I can think of from changing DNS servers to Google's 8.8.8..8/8.8.4.4, flushing the DNS resolver cache, clearing the site data for SSA.gov, disabling Bit Defender, and trying in 3 different browsers, 2 of which are portable. I know that I have accessed that website less than 2 weeks ago with no issues. I need access to this site and what needs to be done can not be done via mobile. What could be going on here, and what could I try next?

  • Like 1
  On 24/01/2025 at 16:46, jnelsoninjax said:

I need to access https://secure.ssa.gov/RIL/SiView.action, but I am not able to access it, after some time it says that site is not responding. I have tried 3 different browsers with the same result. Now I have also tried via my cell phone, and it to can not connect. I even pinged the website and it comes back as unreachable. However if I turn off WiFi on my phone and just use mobile data, I can access the site with no issues. I have done everything I can think of from changing DNS servers to Google's 8.8.8..8/8.8.4.4, flushing the DNS resolver cache, clearing the site data for SSA.gov, disabling Bit Defender, and trying in 3 different browsers, 2 of which are portable. I know that I have accessed that website less than 2 weeks ago with no issues. I need access to this site and what needs to be done can not be done via mobile. What could be going on here, and what could I try next?

Expand  

You could try a VPN, it's working fine here and I always browse with NordVPN on. There's plenty of free options if it's just for the one site and you otherwise don't have a need for one though.

OK, what could be the underlying problem though? A VPN would certainly work as a temporary workaround, but I really would like to get to the cause of the issue. FF only has uBlock Origin as an add-on and even though it shows nothing blocked I still disabled it as troubleshooting.

  On 24/01/2025 at 17:01, Circaflex said:

Do you have a system wide ad blocker? or anything built into your router? it seems to me your router is causing the issue if it happens on your phone as well, until you disable wifi.

Expand  

We have a gateway from the ISP and have no access to its configuration, the password listed on the device has been changed by the ISP.

  On 24/01/2025 at 18:56, jnelsoninjax said:

OK, what could be the underlying problem though? A VPN would certainly work as a temporary workaround, but I really would like to get to the cause of the issue. FF only has uBlock Origin as an add-on and even though it shows nothing blocked I still disabled it as troubleshooting.

We have a gateway from the ISP and have no access to its configuration, the password listed on the device has been changed by the ISP.

Expand  

I have seen it before. A dealership was unable to access a particular website. When the ISP gave them a new IP address, everything started working again.

  On 24/01/2025 at 18:56, jnelsoninjax said:

OK, what could be the underlying problem though? A VPN would certainly work as a temporary workaround, but I really would like to get to the cause of the issue. FF only has uBlock Origin as an add-on and even though it shows nothing blocked I still disabled it as troubleshooting.

We have a gateway from the ISP and have no access to its configuration, the password listed on the device has been changed by the ISP.

Expand  

Most likely a peering issue or similar between your ISP and the site you're trying to access or a blacklisted IP address. Either way something only your ISP can resolve.

  On 25/01/2025 at 03:30, theefool said:

As a test to bypass dns, you can try to ping it and use that address to try to connect, for example:

https://137.200.40.10/RIL/SiView.action

You will get a cert error.  This is just a test.

Expand  

That works, so what does that mean?

Have you tried (no clue on what browser you use), incognito mode, or inprivate mode, or new private?

Just a note, not an issue if you can't ping an address.  If you get an ip address that is good for testing dns.  No replies, mostly due to icmp echo being blocked.  Though sometimes can give bad result, due to cache.

The issue could be your isp. 

Note there is a way to bypass the cert error.

Just odd that your switch/router is causing the issue.  reset?

another test would be to set that ip and name to the hosts table.  To see if that works. (not permanent solution, again a test)

137.200.40.10    secure.ssa.gov

  On 25/01/2025 at 05:47, jnelsoninjax said:

That works, so what does that mean?

Expand  

If that works that points to your dns not resolving it - use your fav tool.. nslookup, dig, host, doggo and query your dns directly.

from cmd line do just simple nslookup

$ nslookup secure.ssa.gov
Server:  pi.hole
Address:  192.168.3.10

Non-authoritative answer:
Name:    secure.ssa.gov
Addresses:  2001:1930:d08::1b
          137.200.40.10

you can change what ns you point to with server

$ nslookup
Default Server:  pi.hole
Address:  192.168.3.10

> server 8.8.8.8
Default Server:  dns.google
Address:  8.8.8.8

> secure.ssa.gov
Server:  dns.google
Address:  8.8.8.8

Non-authoritative answer:
Name:    secure.ssa.gov
Addresses:  2001:1930:d08::1b
          137.200.40.10

if your first nslookup works, then your browser most likely using some other dns via doh most likely... If first one doesn't work, but say 2nd one does - you can point to any ns you want google, quad9, etc. etc.

If your first attempt doesn't work, most likely pointing at your router for dns - you will need to look into why its not resolving that fqdn.

 

  On 24/01/2025 at 18:56, jnelsoninjax said:

OK, what could be the underlying problem though? A VPN would certainly work as a temporary workaround, but I really would like to get to the cause of the issue. FF only has uBlock Origin as an add-on and even though it shows nothing blocked I still disabled it as troubleshooting.

We have a gateway from the ISP and have no access to its configuration, the password listed on the device has been changed by the ISP.

Expand  

Ublock Origin blocks Google Analytics which is present on the SSA site.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Someone wrote a script to block 'brainrot' content online using an $8 smart plug by Usama Jawad Original image via Neil Chen Many people use smart plugs nowadays due to the various advantages they offer, including automation, integration with mobile software, increased home security, better energy efficiency, and compatibility with other smart products. However, a smart plug customer has gone a step further by enhancing their hardware in a way that it blocks them from viewing "brainrot" content online, or any website, for that matter. As seen in a popular thread over on Hacker News, a person known as "NWChen" has written a script that connects to the $8 Kasa Smart Wi-Fi Plug Mini and utilizes it to restrict access to websites of your choice. In essence, this plug then acts as a physical switch that you can toggle to visit certain websites. NWChen's main motivation behind this initiative was to avoid brainrot, with examples listed as X (formerly known as Twitter), Instagram, YouTube, and Reddit in their blog post. In terms of technical functionality, the smart plug connects to Wi-Fi (obviously) and hosts a physical switch that can be used to turn it on and off. NWChen's script connects to the smart plug via an API and then polls its state. If it's on, websites of your choice get restricted and you can't open them anymore, until you physically get up and turn off the plug, or remove the website from you blocklist. NWChen has recommended plugging in the hardware far away from you so there is sufficient resistance in turning off the plug. In the thread, many have praised this invention, believing that the nature of this mechanism provides enough hurdles where you'd rather just not visit the problematic websites anymore. However, some have noted that "those without self control cannot be trusted if they hold the switch". Some have also highlighted a problem where a user can simply stop the script's execution without much friction. Overall, it's a fairly interesting setup, even if it's fairly rudimentary in nature. Configuring this physical block with a Kasa smart plug is fairly easy. You can simply download the script from the laptop-brick GitHub project here, install it, get the IP address of your smart plug, and then use it when you're executing the script. You can modify the blocklist using a dedicated file present inside the GitHub project.
    • We'll probably mirror the EU rule, we've done that in many other areas, but if we don't, well we can add this as another reason why Brexit shouldn't have happened. Personally, if I started to get ads in WhatsApp, that would be a big incentive for me to want to switch to an alternative, and I doubt it will be difficult for me to get my contacts to change as well.
    • It reminds me of fossil fuels, as they try to push the price up and renewable energy continues to get better and cheaper, it's putting the squeeze on the fossil fuel industry. In this case, bringing jobs back to modern countries with higher wages would be a big incentive for corporations to remove humans from the workforce and replace them with AI and robotics, and the funny thing is about that, consumers will demand it because they want things cheaper not more expensive, also corporations will be forced to do it if they want to survive against others that go that route. At the end of the day, they didn't pick cheap labour because they wanted to do so, they did so because competition forced companies to do so, bringing jobs back to western countries would make these companies less competitive on the world stage, unless they use a lot more AI and robotics to remove a lot of humans from the workforce. With that said, bringing jobs back to more stable regions and using AI and robotics does have the benefit of reducing the risk of political trade wars and tariffs, but let's forget this idea of jobs coming back home to higher paying wages, that idea is dead in the water with the advancement of AI and robotics, and with humans, it would only end up making a lot more things more expensive.
    • Slave, assistant, companion? I think that line will blur a lot as robotics become more human like that, it wouldn't surprise me if a lot of us see them as a friend or even more.
    • It's all about flexibility, we've designed a world around humans, so having robots that can work in human like environments with the same flexibility we have, offers a lot of advantages in many areas. With that said, for specific tasks, there are better ways than human like robots, but it really depends on what task you want to do. Also, we should remember, even thought we can build human like robots, they can be built so they are stronger, faster and cheaper than we can work, so even thought that likely not as fast or as cheap as automation, it's certainly a lot more flexible and far cheaper than humans.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Miguel Batista earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      moojay67 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      urbanmopdubai1 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Johnny Mrkvička earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      654
    2. 2
      Michael Scrip
      230
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      220
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      151
    5. 5
      Xenon
      145
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!