Recommended Posts

I am in the process of planning a fairly large property renovation, involving moving nearly every wall at the rear of the house. So this is giving me the opportunity to plan in all the wiring I'd need to do something better than using the built in TV speakers or a soundbar that I have always used.

This is what I have in mind, excuse the very basic sketchup, I only opened the application for the first time at the weekend.

Screenshot-2025-02-13-at-12-15-29.png

I'll start by saying I haven't got the first idea on audio quality, spending thousands on a setup would probably be wasted on me. In fact the priority list is, firstly, as invisible as possible, secondly, ease of use, then audio quality and price equal.

So with that in mind I am thinking front left and right channels either side of the TV built into the wall unit that will house the TV, with some storage and display cabinets with glass wear inside. Some form of control hardware in there too, hidden if possible. Something like this but with the TV lower, actual eye height from a seated position, I hate too high TVs.

IMG-0087.jpg

With 2 or 4 ceiling speakers for the rears/sides. I have absolutely no idea where to put a sub. I know this isn't the best staging, but I won't have anywhere else to fit rears.

I have a nVidia shield that I use for streaming from my Plex server. We also have a freesat feed for live TV. I am looking to buy a LG C4 65 or 77" depending on how the budget goes after the building work is done.

I know my wife will veto any big speakers on show purely on aesthetics, so the only way I can do this is if they are as hidden as possible. I might be able to get away with some black rectangle ones on the sides of the TV and below it. Rears will had to be angled in ceiling with white covers to blend into the ceiling.

For usability, I want is for the sound to be better than built in speakers, but functionally the same. I have a TV remote, I turn the volume up, it goes up, I turn if we have a party I want to be able to say Alexa play Spotify and it come out of the speakers. Importantly I want it to be so easy to use that my daughter can do it. If it's not I'll get it in the neck.

So where I am looking for advice.

What kind of receiver do it need to be the brains?

Can anyone recommend some good bang for the buck speakers that fit the above?

What sub should I be looking at and any ideas where I can put it?

Will speakers fitted to where I have planned cause vibrations that the glass in the display panel might clink? 

It looks like the receivers have HDMI for devices such as the Shield, but the freesat tuner will be in the TV. Does this mean I need a optical cable to connect back to the amp for sound for that to play through the setup?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1451706-basic-setup-for-a-novice/
Share on other sites

On 14/02/2025 at 01:30, anthdci said:

What sub should I be looking at and any ideas where I can put it?

 

Do you have any space in the corners to place a sub? If you can't place a single large subwoofer, maybe try two (or more) smaller ones?

On 14/02/2025 at 06:15, hellowalkman said:

Do you have any space in the corners to place a sub? If you can't place a single large subwoofer, maybe try two (or more) smaller ones?

It’s not so much space. It’s going to be quite a large space. It’s asthetics. A black box in the corner will just look out of place and my wife will hate it. I’m 50/50 about getting away with speakers each side of the TV.

Quite honestly, if you haven't got the first idea of audio quality, ask yourself why do you want to upgrade from your soundbar? What do you want to achieve, and what's your budget? Soundbars will probably get crucified by any AV enthusiast but they definitely have a place in this world. 

On 15/02/2025 at 03:16, tsupersonic said:

Quite honestly, if you haven't got the first idea of audio quality, ask yourself why do you want to upgrade from your soundbar? What do you want to achieve, and what's your budget? Soundbars will probably get crucified by any AV enthusiast but they definitely have a place in this world. 

It's certainly an option. Basically my in laws have done a very similar extension to what we want to do. They have the audio coming out of the TV which is fine, most of the time, but they had a party a few months ago and the boxing was on so we put that on for those who wanted to watch it. You couldn't hear a word of it with the TV on full blast. Obviously built in speakers are rubbish, so this is the extreme. But it got me thinking, and what I want is as much future proofing as possible. My daughter is 4, I want this house to be where her and her friends come as they grow up. So for kids birthday parties when there are 20 kids running round screaming  to 10-15 years when they are all having a few drinks before going out they can have music on and have a good time for example. I want to have thought it out while I can, because once the walls are plastered it becomes a lot harder. 

I am probably overthinking it, I just don't want to kick myself in a few years time for forgetting something. I figure if I am going to put wires in now, it makes sense to get some use out of them. 

Here's the thing: you're never going to get great surround sound from a room setup like that where one side is open. I have been more fortunate in that my living room is U shaped |__| where I have 3 walls that are approx. 14 feet on the 3 sides and its only open at the back. So I can use a sound bar (Sennheiser Ambeo Max) because it depends on the side walls reflecting the sound from the speaker at each end of the sound bar. Other sound bars can work when they have 2 wireless speakers for the rear channels but you still need side walls to reflect the sound properly. With your room setup it might be best of have the front and back channels coming from ceiling mounted speakers and just have a center channel speaker mounted below the screen. The most important thing is to have electronics where you can adjust the center channel separately from the other channels and raise it to a level where you can clearly hear the voices over and above the other channels with the music and special effects.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
On 17/02/2025 at 10:58, anthdci said:

It's certainly an option. Basically my in laws have done a very similar extension to what we want to do. They have the audio coming out of the TV which is fine, most of the time, but they had a party a few months ago and the boxing was on so we put that on for those who wanted to watch it. You couldn't hear a word of it with the TV on full blast. Obviously built in speakers are rubbish, so this is the extreme. But it got me thinking, and what I want is as much future proofing as possible. My daughter is 4, I want this house to be where her and her friends come as they grow up. So for kids birthday parties when there are 20 kids running round screaming  to 10-15 years when they are all having a few drinks before going out they can have music on and have a good time for example. I want to have thought it out while I can, because once the walls are plastered it becomes a lot harder. 

I am probably overthinking it, I just don't want to kick myself in a few years time for forgetting something. I figure if I am going to put wires in now, it makes sense to get some use out of them. 

Sounds like you just want louder speakers than standard TV spakers, which soundbars are better than standard TV speakers. Maybe you're trying to justify getting an expensive surround sound setup, which is fine if you want it/have budget for it. But for your usecase (simplicity + cost sake) would be fine with a good soundbar (with 2 rear wireless speakers + sub). Hell I have an open floor plan with huge ceilings where my TV is, and the soundbar is just fine for everyday use. It's way louder than I need, I didn't have to drill anything into walls/ceilings, and it just works. 

BTW what is that area behind the sofa; your diagram just shows an empty 3 sided area. If that is usable space, depending on its size, I would consider reversing the setup and having the TV on the end wall of that space with the sofa facing that direction which might provide better viewing and sound.

  • Like 1

That room does not in any way lend itself to great surround sound quality.  It's achievable, but only at a lot of cost and compromise. However, from what you've suggested, you value "decent quality" and "volume" over "wow, this sounds astonishing"?

I have an audiophile mindset when needs be - my father's businesses stemmed from hand-crafted speaker cabinets - I know my stuff.  But I also know when to not care so much - same as people who rant about how MP3 is a crap format, then listen to their music using an iPhone... Nobody is impressed - it's more valuable to be subjective!

If you're open to rotating the room and putting the TV on the opposite wall, that will help more than anything else.  Like, seriously - A LOT!  But can understand that you may not wish to alter the plans and that's understandable.

PERSONALLY if that were my room and it was a fixed layout that I 100% could not change - I'd still stick with a good soundbar under the TV, pop the subwoofer anywhere you can hide it (inside a cabinet is actually fine too).  And then if you care, a pair of wireless surround speakers ticked into the corner of the wall opposite - they'll need power, but that can be run in coving.   Its not going to impress anyone but it will sure sound good enough to me.  Now if you took ALL that and reversed it so the TV is on the opposite wall, I genuinely feel you'd get maybe a 50% improvement in sound quality.

  • Like 2

lots to reply to so please bare with me if i miss something

On 2/18/2025 at 6:06 PM, dwd999 said:

BTW what is that area behind the sofa; your diagram just shows an empty 3 sided area. If that is usable space, depending on its size, I would consider reversing the setup and having the TV on the end wall of that space with the sofa facing that direction which might provide better viewing and sound.

It will be a kids play area, toys, guinea pig cage etc while my daughter is young, and then turn into a dining table area when she is older. We have picked this location for the TV because it means when we have more people round they can sit at the kitchen island stools (i know not pictured). If the TV was on the other end that would be far more separated. This is a living space primarily, not a cinema room.

 

On 2/19/2025 at 5:42 AM, hellowalkman said:

I agree with this take. Having the surround sound setup there should potentially be a lot better.

see above

 

On 2/19/2025 at 4:24 PM, Dick Montage said:

That room does not in any way lend itself to great surround sound quality.  It's achievable, but only at a lot of cost and compromise. However, from what you've suggested, you value "decent quality" and "volume" over "wow, this sounds astonishing"?

I have an audiophile mindset when needs be - my father's businesses stemmed from hand-crafted speaker cabinets - I know my stuff.  But I also know when to not care so much - same as people who rant about how MP3 is a crap format, then listen to their music using an iPhone... Nobody is impressed - it's more valuable to be subjective!

If you're open to rotating the room and putting the TV on the opposite wall, that will help more than anything else.  Like, seriously - A LOT!  But can understand that you may not wish to alter the plans and that's understandable.

PERSONALLY if that were my room and it was a fixed layout that I 100% could not change - I'd still stick with a good soundbar under the TV, pop the subwoofer anywhere you can hide it (inside a cabinet is actually fine too).  And then if you care, a pair of wireless surround speakers ticked into the corner of the wall opposite - they'll need power, but that can be run in coving.   Its not going to impress anyone but it will sure sound good enough to me.  Now if you took ALL that and reversed it so the TV is on the opposite wall, I genuinely feel you'd get maybe a 50% improvement in sound quality.

thanks, all makes sense. I am wondering if it would be better to have some kind of corner mount speakers put in the opposite corner, vs putting some in the ceiling, or if its worth doing that too. Not perfect but certainly worth considering. Planning on running cables right across the room to the rear speakers is not difficult at this stage, as the walls don't exist more than lines on a piece of paper.

On 2/20/2025 at 11:43 PM, hellowalkman said:

Then you are probably just better off with something like a good soundbar (stereo) and not bother with surround sound IMO.

Think I am leaning towards a decent soundbar from the many youtube video reviews I've watched in the last few days. Maybe something like the Sonos Arc. I can put some wire in while the ceiling is off to some ceiling speakers then I can decide if I want to add them later I can, maybe with the Sonos amp. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That reminds me. Now that i have Quest 3 I should go back and try the first one in VR. ... last time i did that I tried it in some janky VR setup which was still really good.
    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • How is everyone doing? My hobbies are gaming, sports (netball, tennis) and going to the gym. I also love cooking. Where are you guys from?
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!