Recommended Posts

 

Is it just me or the results of Perplexity and ChatGPT seem less smart. Not being able to answer to some basic questions or do analysis where they need to get data from multiple sources before compiling the results. The context window seems to be smaller. 

I do not recall that being the case. I notice a distinct degradation. I wonder if they’re “throttling” their compute to save cost.

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1452803-is-ai-getting-dumber/
Share on other sites

Study: AI Is Making Us All Dumber

Well, it’s official: An increased reliance on artificial intelligence has been linked to diminished critical thinking abilities, a new study has found.

https://tech.co/news/study-ai-making-us-dumber#:~:text=According to a new study,workout that helps people learn.&text=Well%2C it's official%3A An increased,a new study has found.

On 20/03/2025 at 05:02, thexfile said:

Study: AI Is Making Us All Dumber

Well, it’s official: An increased reliance on artificial intelligence has been linked to diminished critical thinking abilities, a new study has found.

https://tech.co/news/study-ai-making-us-dumber#:~:text=According to a new study,workout that helps people learn.&text=Well%2C it's official%3A An increased,a new study has found.

I definitely believe that. People around me who would work on solving problems for hours a day now just get it done in a few minutes. No brain cells burned. 

On 19/03/2025 at 23:54, FMH said:

 

Is it just me or the results of Perplexity and ChatGPT seem less smart. Not being able to answer to some basic questions or do analysis where they need to get data from multiple sources before compiling the results. The context window seems to be smaller. 

I do not recall that being the case. I notice a distinct degradation. I wonder if they’re “throttling” their compute to save cost.

More that their results are being polluted by a rapidly increasing amount of stupid on the internet...

On 20/03/2025 at 00:40, FMH said:

I definitely believe that. People around me who would work on solving problems for hours a day now just get it done in a few minutes. No brain cells burned. 

I work for a large international software company and though we develop a few systems ourselves, the USE of external AI systems such as ChatGPT has been banned throughout the entire company...

So, a few things I have an opinion on here:

Is AI getting dumber: The LLMs now have massively more data to build upon and there are certainly more hallucinations than previously.  As a consumer of GenAI, then I feel it's valid to feedback to it when it's wrong, as it learns from this.  This was demonstrated and proven.  

But people are (generally) not feeding back, so it is significantly hampered in it's ability to learn from what is a good and bad result.

Is AI making people dumber: Some yes, some no.  I use GenAI frequently, and it has not made me "dumber", if anything it has improved the rate at which I digest information.  But again, I use it "correctly" and understand it is a work in progress and both feedback and analyse it's output.

I liken it to when GPS devices started appearing on people's dashboards, the early TomTom devices - they begat poorer drives with respect to lane discipline.  I am from an era of looking at a map, planning my route, knowing where I am going before I get there, but when people just started relying on TomToms, they would change lane at the last second because the device hadn't prepped them to turn left at the roundabout until it hit the roundabout.

We use GenAI significantly within our workspace, trained on our own data, and restricted to our own uses.  We have a robust policy about the use of CoPilot and others (e.g. ChatGPT).  I'm currently looking into Agentic AI  to go beyond basic automation of jobs, but as ever - I always check what it is wanting to do with data, how it uses it, where it's taking it and what it outputs.

  • Like 1

basically getting dumber... initial models were trained on approved and collected sources of data...... then they add more and more to it and then start harvesting crap like reddit for info then it all just goes to heck because its trained not smart..... it doesn't know what is real or not just keeps telling itself what i see is real so start merging that into what i already know

On 20/03/2025 at 13:22, neufuse said:

basically getting dumber... initial models were trained on approved and collected sources of data...... then they add more and more to it and then start harvesting crap like reddit for info then it all just goes to heck because its trained not smart..... it doesn't know what is real or not just keeps telling itself what i see is real so start merging that into what i already know

EXACTLY.  Unless you feed back that the output is tosh, it basically says to itself "Yeah, that looks right" and ups it in its preferred responses.

On 20/03/2025 at 13:26, Dick Montage said:

EXACTLY.  Unless you feed back that the output is tosh, it basically says to itself "Yeah, that looks right" and ups it in its preferred responses.

I remember a while ago I asked ChatGPT to write a simple bubble sort function in C# just as a simple test.  It didn't work.

 

So I did a quick search on Stack Overflow and found the EXACT same code, with the same bug.  So not only did it return buggy code, but it stole it from Stack Overflow without any kind of citation.  Double fail! :p

 

I’ve had it write code which I then noticed was using a deprecated function. I pointed this out and it agreed and provided more up to date code.

So… why give me the first code? Idiot AI

On 19/03/2025 at 19:54, FMH said:

 

Is it just me or the results of Perplexity and ChatGPT seem less smart. Not being able to answer to some basic questions or do analysis where they need to get data from multiple sources before compiling the results. The context window seems to be smaller. 

I do not recall that being the case. I notice a distinct degradation. I wonder if they’re “throttling” their compute to save cost.

Absolutely AI is getting dumber.  They're using social media sites like facebook, instagram, and reddit.  Social media is proof that not everyone's opinion is important.

  • Love 2
On 21/03/2025 at 11:45, Tomo said:

AI has never been smart, there is no intelligence whatsoever. It draws upon data that is already available on the Internet, whether that information is accurate or not.

Facile interpretation at best.

On 24/03/2025 at 10:30, Tomo said:

A more complex answer isn't required and would take awhile.

But provide more value.  All intelligence is based around pre-existing information and extrapolation - arguably we would point towards Wolfram Alpha as a perfect example of this.  Was it "smart"?  By who's definition?  I'd argue yes, because it wasn't just simple 1:1 answers, but rather taking the steps of abstraction away from the input question towards the relevancy between information sources and presenting an answer back - extrapolation.  Saying AI has never been "smart" and that it's just parroting it back shows a lack of understanding of what AI has been for decades.  Now with generative AI, yes - it still presents back answers based upon pre-existing data, but it's able to (when given opportunity) learn from that and apply that learning to other related cases.  That differentiates it greatly from parroting back information.

If a user consumes these responses without understanding how to tailor them, without giving the engine the ability to learn, and then writes it off as "not smart" - that speaks more towards a user than a model.  It may take a while (it's two words) to teach users.

  • Like 2

AI also trains on uninformed and incorrect data, think reddit and popular opinion with only a few corrective and downvoted replies, and then you have your answer.

A good AI is one that can distinguish from it but it is like people who are unable to inform themselves properly and then make the wrong uninformed decision.

Don't know what type of AI  needs you guys are using. I'm using based on services, specifically insurance in mexico with law fundamentals and it's been turned out very well.
Also one of my employees uses it for marketing and also has giving very good results.

In no one way should it be used instead of critical thinking. However if people use AI instead of their brains, they can start saying good bye to their jobs. 
Which overall that's a good thing. As a consumer and cliente of certain services, what I don't want is an air head answering my inquiries.

I have 4 employees and they all use it as guide. I'm responsable in having them in constant training so they don't rot their brain due to lack of use.

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
On 25/03/2025 at 00:04, freedonX said:

Don't know what type of AI  needs you guys are using. I'm using based on services, specifically insurance in mexico with law fundamentals and it's been turned out very well.
Also one of my employees uses it for marketing and also has giving very good results.

In no one way should it be used instead of critical thinking. However if people use AI instead of their brains, they can start saying good bye to their jobs. 
Which overall that's a good thing. As a consumer and cliente of certain services, what I don't want is an air head answering my inquiries.

I have 4 employees and they all use it as guide. I'm responsable in having them in constant training so they don't rot their brain due to lack of use.

You are using a well trained model, which has been provided valid data to work from - and I assume then further consumes the results of whatever it is being used for (which is another form of training that validates it's earlier results).  As such, I absolutely would expect much better results.  I'm doing similar using financial systems to forecast and then validate off the later bills - it's been flawless in this regard.

  • 8 months later...

I’ve noticed similar behavior. The models aren’t getting “dumber”; updates just adjust the balance of speed, safety, and cost, which can affect thoroughness in multi-step reasoning. Context handling varies too, leading to shorter or less detailed answers. It’s more fine-tuning than a capability drop.

  • Like 3
  • 4 weeks later...
On 22/12/2025 at 03:58, Sigiand said:

I think the feeling that ‘AI is getting dumber’ is often linked to expectations. When technology is new, it amazes us. Then we start using it every day and notice mistakes more often.

I recently searched for some info. on my new stove. The AI overview gave instructions on a microwave. I agree AI is dumb.

  • 3 weeks later...
On 04/01/2026 at 15:43, alexcc said:

You’re not alone in noticing this, but it’s likely not that the models are getting “dumber.” What’s changing is how they’re deployed.

A few factors at play:

Platforms often route users to different model variants depending on load, cost, or plan.

Safety and reliability filters can make responses feel more conservative or less exploratory.

Some tools optimize for speed over depth, which affects multi-step analysis.

Context handling can vary between sessions and interfaces.

The core models continue to improve, but real-world performance depends heavily on product decisions, not just model intelligence.

Actually, a large part of the problem is AI slop itself. As more and more of it is generated, much if it completely false, it gets fed back into the models, polluting the data and increasing the prevalence of "hallucinations".  It's a self-destructive feedback loop that will eventually make them unusable unless a way is found to exclude it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!