Recommended Posts

Hi all. ISP pushing me from 800Mbps to  1200Mbps, however, I want to buy my own modem. Theirs have been a bit wonky, would rather just handle it myself. Data capped at 1.2TB, haven't gone over yet (although pretty close at times), paying $15 rental, some have suggested a DIY solution.

Anyway, I'm in need of a few upgrades and need some suggestions. My onboard LAN is capped at 1Gbit (I219-v and a Killer E2500), choose your poison? Anyway, an add-on NIC might be in order, not sure what to go with. Then there's the modem and router. A lot of these modems are very close in price, some supporting 2.3 - 2.5Gbit, others a flat 1Gbit that wouldn't let me touch my 1200Mbit that I'm paying. Boils down to a Netgear CM3000 (for below cost due to built up rewards) or Motorola B12. Then of course, there's my router. I bought a Nighthawk X10 a while ago for $10 at thrift, before this whole upgrade thing came up. Its ports are capped at 1Gbit, but it DOES have a 10Gbit SFP+ port. I could possibly get a NIC that has sfp+ port, or a switch that has 2.5Gbit ports. I'm the only wired PC in the house, everything else is wifi, no foreseeable new wired connections in the far off future. Or, I could get an RS100 router that would let me use my 1200Mbit connection. I've been subscribed for about 6 years, so have paid about $1080 in rental since then. It's too bad I didn't DIY since the beginning, it would have been paid of long ago -_- better late than never I guess. What's your thought on this?

  • Like 1
  • Izlude changed the title to ISP upping me to 1200Mbps, need solutions...
On 26/06/2025 at 14:39, Izlude said:

Hi all. ISP pushing me from 800Mbps to  1200Mbps, however, I want to buy my own modem. Theirs have been a bit wonky, would rather just handle it myself. Data capped at 1.2TB, haven't gone over yet (although pretty close at times), paying $15 rental, some have suggested a DIY solution.

Anyway, I'm in need of a few upgrades and need some suggestions. My onboard LAN is capped at 1Gbit (I219-v and a Killer E2500), choose your poison? Anyway, an add-on NIC might be in order, not sure what to go with. Then there's the modem and router. A lot of these modems are very close in price, some supporting 2.3 - 2.5Gbit, others a flat 1Gbit that wouldn't let me touch my 1200Mbit that I'm paying. Boils down to a Netgear CM3000 (for below cost due to built up rewards) or Motorola B12. Then of course, there's my router. I bought a Nighthawk X10 a while ago for $10 at thrift, before this whole upgrade thing came up. Its ports are capped at 1Gbit, but it DOES have a 10Gbit SFP+ port. I could possibly get a NIC that has sfp+ port, or a switch that has 2.5Gbit ports. I'm the only wired PC in the house, everything else is wifi, no foreseeable new wired connections in the far off future. Or, I could get an RS100 router that would let me use my 1200Mbit connection. I've been subscribed for about 6 years, so have paid about $1080 in rental since then. It's too bad I didn't DIY since the beginning, it would have been paid of long ago -_- better late than never I guess. What's your thought on this?

I know with my isp they will only support certain models. You might want to check with them,

hi thanks for input. those two modems are supported ;) thankfully. i really am leaning towards the b12 though since there's a few complaints of the cm3000 and its chipset (drops and whatnot), although those might just be vocal minority complaints.

On 26/06/2025 at 19:39, Izlude said:

Hi all. ISP pushing me from 800Mbps to  1200Mbps, however, I want to buy my own modem. Theirs have been a bit wonky, would rather just handle it myself. Data capped at 1.2TB, haven't gone over yet (although pretty close at times), paying $15 rental, some have suggested a DIY solution.

Anyway, I'm in need of a few upgrades and need some suggestions. My onboard LAN is capped at 1Gbit (I219-v and a Killer E2500), choose your poison? Anyway, an add-on NIC might be in order, not sure what to go with. Then there's the modem and router. A lot of these modems are very close in price, some supporting 2.3 - 2.5Gbit, others a flat 1Gbit that wouldn't let me touch my 1200Mbit that I'm paying. Boils down to a Netgear CM3000 (for below cost due to built up rewards) or Motorola B12. Then of course, there's my router. I bought a Nighthawk X10 a while ago for $10 at thrift, before this whole upgrade thing came up. Its ports are capped at 1Gbit, but it DOES have a 10Gbit SFP+ port. I could possibly get a NIC that has sfp+ port, or a switch that has 2.5Gbit ports. I'm the only wired PC in the house, everything else is wifi, no foreseeable new wired connections in the far off future. Or, I could get an RS100 router that would let me use my 1200Mbit connection. I've been subscribed for about 6 years, so have paid about $1080 in rental since then. It's too bad I didn't DIY since the beginning, it would have been paid of long ago -_- better late than never I guess. What's your thought on this?

i built my own, all ya need is a pc with two network cards and i used operwrt as the os

Oof my bad.. I just realized the WAN port on the X10 only allows 1Gbit input from the modem >.<  arghh that derails everything lol. OK I'll need a new router then.
Since I'm the only wired user in the household (everything else is wireless), would you say the RS100 is a good solution?  apparently not.. accepts 2.5Gbit, but outputs 1Gbit.. Still need a better solution.

As for a build your own, I'm afraid i'm limited in power here :( PC, Games, TVs, Printer, Receiver/Amp+ secondary Amp.. heck even the Mini Split (don't ask how/why they did it this way). One more major device trips the breaker :P

Although I just noticed this tidbit on my router's config page. It almost looks as if the modem could somehow input "INTO" the 10Gbit port, rather than using the 10Gbit port as an output? https://imgur.com/a/uiObRNK

What would be the purpose of this?  Even if that were possible, I'm still limited to 1Gbit regular ports ToT  I was also looking at the link aggregation on the router, but apparently that doesn't really help with download from a single stream, just balances.. and Win10/11 seems to have broken this functionality due to it never being intended for consumer OSs. I had it running at one point using the Intel proset driver that came with the mobo (has two LANs, just because I could), but that one update killed it. Not sure if that would at least have contributed to something.

Edited by Izlude
On 26/06/2025 at 22:12, Izlude said:

Oof my bad.. I just realized the WAN port on the X10 only allows 1Gbit input from the modem >.<  arghh that derails everything lol. OK I'll need a new router then.
Since I'm the only wired user in the household (everything else is wireless), would you say the RS100 is a good solution?  apparently not.. accepts 2.5Gbit, but outputs 1Gbit.. Still need a better solution.

As for a build your own, I'm afraid i'm limited in power here :( PC, Games, TVs, Printer, Receiver/Amp+ secondary Amp.. heck even the Mini Split (don't ask how/why they did it this way). One more major device trips the breaker 😛

 

American? Yer whole 120v limitation is madness. 

You can still get low powered pcs , nice, that'll do the job 

Hello,

I am using a Hitron CODA56 cable modem with Comcast Xfinity's 1200 Mbps service.  No issues noted.  I had looked at the Motorola and Netgear options for a cable modem, but neither was available for purchase at the time I upgraded my cable connection.

There are multiple models in the Netgear Nighthawk X10 line-up.  I am guessing you have either the the Netgear Nighthawk X10 AD7000 model (R8900) or the Netgear Nighthawk X10 AD7200 model (R9000) model, is that correct?  Both of these only have one gigabit WAN (internet) ports for connection to the modem, all of the remaining ports for the LAN side of things are gigabit Ethernet ports.  The 10GbE port on the devices is meant for connection to local NAS storage.  I suppose you could connect the desktop computer directly to it, although it would still be limited by the gigabit connection between the cable modem and the Netgear residential gateway broadband router.

I would suggest looking for a residential gateway broadband router from a company like Asus, Netgear, TP-Link or maybe even Ubiquiti, depending upon budget, that has 2.5Gbps (or faster) WAN and LAN ports.  That would allow you to make full use of the 1.2Gbps connection from your ISP as well as have some room for future growth, speed-wise.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

 

 

On 26/06/2025 at 15:17, Izlude said:

i really am leaning towards the b12 

I have a Motorola B12, and it's been working pretty solidly for a year now. 

On 26/06/2025 at 20:22, goretsky said:

Hello,

I am using a Hitron CODA56 cable modem with Comcast Xfinity's 1200 Mbps service.  No issues noted.  I had looked at the Motorola and Netgear options for a cable modem, but neither was available for purchase at the time I upgraded my cable connection.


Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

 

 

I ordered the Hitron CODA56 yesterday, and hope to see it today.  Thanks for this post!

  • Like 2

Hello,

For a new Ethernet adapter card for your PC, you can get a model that supports a maximum speed of 2.5Gbps, 5Gpbs, or 10Gbps.  Adapter cards at these speeds with RJ-45 connectors may also be referred to as NBASE-T. 

I would suggest avoiding the 5GbE cards, at least on the desktop, as the price difference between them and 10GBpE cards tends to be negligible, and most people either go with a 2. 5GbE or 10GbE card, depending upon their budget and needs.

On the 10 GbE front, some popular options for Ethernet adapters are:

The ASUS, Trendnet and TP-Link adapters all use some version of the Marvell (formerly Aquantia) Ethernet PHY chip, while Intel uses their own X550 chip.  Note that there are many companies that make network adapters using these Ethernet ships, I just included some whose names might be more familiar.

Note that in the 10Gbps space. you will see cards offered with either RJ-45 connectors or SFP+ "cages."  The latter means that the card does not have an Ethernet connector, but requires a separate module to be slotted into to provide an Ethernet or fiber optic interface.  These types of cards cost less, but when combined with a module end up costing more.  Also, they are intended for use in servers that have more ventilation that typical PC cases, so will run hot in a typical desktop.

On the 2.5Gbps side, there are many companies offering these based on Realtek's RTL8125 Ethernet PHY chip, including the above companies.  Intel also offers its own 2.5Gbps chip, the I226-V. I would suggest avoiding anything based on the previous I-225 series, as early versions of those had issues maintaining 2.5Gbps connections.

If you need USB to Ethernet adapters, those are devices I am not as familiar with, but options there are going to be more in the 2.5Gbps and 5Gbps space, as 10Gbps options tend to be limited to Thunderbolt3/4 and USB4 interfaces, be very bulky, and run hot. 

Plugable, Sonnet, and Wavlink are well-known brands that offer USB to 5Gbe adapters; I suspect they have 2.5Gbps adapters as well.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • lots of people us facebook for stuff, threads though no
    • Can you read? I've said I'm willing to pay more for a notchless (no notch) 3:2 screen.
    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • make your own notch - it's not that hard
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      100
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      87
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!