Bans due to launching games on ReFS


Recommended Posts

On 15/09/2025 at 18:20, Eternal Tempest said:

Your just missing the forest for the tree's.

They don't support the file system, it sounds like you tripped the cheat detection, and you will have to go back to what's officially supported to be able to play the game. In addition, I highly suspect the frustration / tone you have probably rubbed their support the wrong way and will be needing to buy and new copy / use a new account.

Most game developers using anti-cheat won't consider the new file system until Microsoft officially allows (at best) as the boot drive in the consumer version of Windows, or at worst make it the default file system on clean installs.

 

 

But why do we need to do this, and why does no one want to pressure them so that they finally see and acknowledge their mistakes? And mainly I only see attempts at ragebait here, and accusations of things that did not happen. Everything should be stated explicitly, rather than with vague formulations that need to be interpreted. Yes, and most developers are actually showing that their anti-cheats behave adequately in this case. Or then all my games on the account would have been banned already, but that's not the case. And again, for some reason, VAC and EAC do not get triggered in different environments, yet here a multibillion-dollar company behaves so rudely.

  • Facepalm 2

Well, it seems that people have forgotten that they have rights and that no one can stand up for each other, evidently also unable to defend themselves. Just letting things take their course and allowing such companies to violate any boundaries.

  • Facepalm 3
On 16/09/2025 at 17:00, funkerwolf said:

Well, it seems that people have forgotten that they have rights and that no one can stand up for each other, evidently also unable to defend themselves. Just letting things take their course and allowing such companies to violate any boundaries.

Yeah, I'm not buying that.  I don't believe you have told the full story here at all.  Moreover, even if you have, the way you tell it hardly suggests any support would think "Easy guy to work with, let's help him resolve his issues".
 

YOU agreed to the EULA
YOU chose to use a filesystem that is hardly "conventional" and would be very likely to trigger a problem
YOU stated that bans are for repeat offenders

  • Like 1

I agreed to what is stated there. I chose the file system that works the fastest and better than others. For the sake of these games, I made an upgrade and in return received a ban without reason, the appeal is ignored, and none of the support services help. I provided all the evidence and repeated everything with the help of friends. If you don't believe the direct facts, then I don't know what else to add. And in these agreements, there is not a word about file systems. Just like with environments, or people should also take responsibility and somehow have figured out that a ban on Wine and Proton is normal. It's interesting how everyone positions themselves to blame only the victims for all the problems, but not those who created all the conditions for this and remain silent about them. The existence of this bug is proven not only by me. And it is a bug because it occurs only in 1 game, while in others it does not lead to a permanent ban. But what can we say about the quality of the anti-cheat if people are getting permanently banned for a blue screen. All I want is for the label of cheaters to be removed from me and my friends, because we are not such.

  • Facepalm 2
On 16/09/2025 at 09:14, funkerwolf said:

I agreed to what is stated there. I chose the file system that works the fastest and better than others. For the sake of these games, I made an upgrade and in return received a ban without reason, the appeal is ignored, and none of the support services help. I provided all the evidence and repeated everything with the help of friends. If you don't believe the direct facts, then I don't know what else to add. And in these agreements, there is not a word about file systems. Just like with environments, or people should also take responsibility and somehow have figured out that a ban on Wine and Proton is normal. It's interesting how everyone positions themselves to blame only the victims for all the problems, but not those who created all the conditions for this and remain silent about them. The existence of this bug is proven not only by me. And it is a bug because it occurs only in 1 game, while in others it does not lead to a permanent ban. But what can we say about the quality of the anti-cheat if people are getting permanently banned for a blue screen. All I want is for the label of cheaters to be removed from me and my friends, because we are not such.

Fastest at what?

 

 

On 14/09/2025 at 18:47, funkerwolf said:

Well then, just take and repeat all the actions, all the evidence is ready.

No thanks, enjoy your ban. My favorite part is not only did you try it, but you also tried it multiple times. 

  • Like 2
On 16/09/2025 at 12:14, funkerwolf said:

I agreed to what is stated there. I chose the file system that works the fastest and better than others. For the sake of these games, I made an upgrade and in return received a ban without reason, the appeal is ignored, and none of the support services help. I provided all the evidence and repeated everything with the help of friends. If you don't believe the direct facts, then I don't know what else to add. And in these agreements, there is not a word about file systems. Just like with environments, or people should also take responsibility and somehow have figured out that a ban on Wine and Proton is normal. It's interesting how everyone positions themselves to blame only the victims for all the problems, but not those who created all the conditions for this and remain silent about them. The existence of this bug is proven not only by me. And it is a bug because it occurs only in 1 game, while in others it does not lead to a permanent ban. But what can we say about the quality of the anti-cheat if people are getting permanently banned for a blue screen. All I want is for the label of cheaters to be removed from me and my friends, because we are not such.

Bottom line is youre trying to play on an unsupported configuration and you will receive no sympathy from Activision or anyone here until you return to a supported configuration. Feel free to submit a feature request to their support team in the meantime until it is supported.

I agree that it sucks that it is not supported but there's nothing we can do here short of applying for a job at activision and working internally to verify support for ReFS.

  • Like 3
On 16/09/2025 at 17:14, funkerwolf said:

I chose the file system that works the fastest and better than others.

"A little knowledge is a dangerous thing"

Sorry, what you mean is "I tinkered, didn't think through how my actions would affect some (pretty obvious) things, and now don't want to take ownership - so I'll tell some half truths on a number of forums where I can play the victim".

On 16/09/2025 at 12:00, funkerwolf said:

Well, it seems that people have forgotten that they have rights and that no one can stand up for each other, evidently also unable to defend themselves. Just letting things take their course and allowing such companies to violate any boundaries.

What rights are you referring to here exactly?

On 17/09/2025 at 11:56, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

What rights are you referring to here exactly?

image.png.2bc440f73196cbfe4fa5e67067c6cb2a.png

Not sure...this is the only thing I can come up for him...other than that, no rights were violated that I could tell.  Even if he was to sue, I am sure Activision lawyers would demonstrate how he violated some sort of EULA by using an unsupported file system. ohh well

I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish here.  You're trying so hard to sway everyone to your side.  What is the end goal?  For all of Neowin to rise up and punish Activision for their transgressions?

Even if you could garner sympathy here, which you don't seem to having much luck in accomplishing, do you really think Activision would unban the accounts because we agree with you?  I'm guessing not.

Time to move on and just go play a game. 

  • Like 3
On 17/09/2025 at 21:04, adrynalyne said:

Pfft, push its damn head under.

I am Canadian; it's against my nature, though if I stop saying I'm sorry, run. 🤣

  • 2 weeks later...

I ain't gonna lie, I'm curious to see the opening to those cases, may make for some good entertainment.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft launches Godot Sample to streamline Xbox PC game development on the engine by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft today announced a new endeavor that aims to make it simpler for Godot developers to get their products into the Xbox PC ecosystem. Dubbed the "XBOX Godot Sample," this is a new public reference for developers using the open-source engine. This is set to serve as an example of how Microsoft GDK, Xbox Services, and PlayFab can be integrated into their projects. The sample is available now on GitHub as a working example. This covers key features in gaming projects that developers may need to release their projects on Xbox PC, with everything from matchmaking and game sign-in to gamepad compatibility with Godot being covered. This release is being called the first step in giving Godot developers the tools to bring their games over to Xbox PC, with more changes to come based on feedback and issue reports. However, the company was clear that this is not related to bringing Godot projects to Xbox consoles. The engine's open development model stops it from accessing console SDKs due to the requirement of NDAs and legal contracts. Here's how it explained this Godot sample project's focus: This is a source-only sample, not a product. It's MIT-licensed at the wrapper layer; the GDK and PlayFab dependencies still require their own installs and license acceptance, consistent with our other XBOX samples. There is no set update cadence for support or maintenance. We’ll watch the repo, monitor issues, and iterate where it makes sense, but this isn't a commercial release. That said, we’re excited to hear your feedback and see any community PRs, as we evolve this together. This is the first step in bringing Godot for XBOX on PC. We plan to evolve it over time based on what the community tells us is most valuable. This sample is built specifically for XBOX on PC. It doesn’t include support for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One. If you’re already building for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One, please talk with your XBOX representative. If not, you can get started by signing up here. Game developers can find the XBOX Godot Sample by heading to GitHub over here. Documentation on how to get started with Godot for building an Xbox PC project can be seen here.
    • I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • It is notable that around 70% of web browser users choose Google Chrome. However, it is puzzling why anyone on Windows would opt for Chrome when Microsoft Edge is often superior in many aspects and comes pre-installed. Edge collects less data, uses less RAM, and is more optimized for Windows as a native Microsoft product. While some may point to bloat in Edge, much of it can be removed with simple tools, requiring no more effort than installing Chrome. Meanwhile, Chrome reportedly downloads large amounts of AI data (4 GB) without explicit consent. I'm sure you Chrome users love that, or? Here is one example of a tool that doesn't even need to be installed to be able to use: https://github.com/TheBobPony/MSEdgeTweaker Although Microsoft’s aggressive promotion of Edge may be questionable, the browser’s current advantages make it a preferable choice over Chrome today, even if Chrome may have been better in the past.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!