Mono Gateway (that's its name, it is a 10 Gbps router)


Recommended Posts

I have been seeing videos about it on YouTube lately, those behind it seem to have documented more or less the way they developed it and its manufacturing: https://www.youtube.com/@tomazzaman/videos

I was wondering if anyone knows anything about this, because it is a $600 piece of kit, for a router alone! I am just using the router + WiFi AP unit that my ISP provided me with, I have 1Gbps symmetric fiber link that's more than enough for my needs, although I have been thinking about getting a mini-PC or similar to experiment with it as a router. I just haven't had the time to explore it all, the learning curve seems steep and I still don't know much about networking.

Anyway, this thing is supposed to have an open source-like approach to it, maybe that's why it is expensive (for me at least), but I think there are routers that can do 10 Gbps with similar features for less money. They say it will ship with OpenWRT, but that other things will be supported too.

These are its specs from https://mono.si/:
 

Quote

 

CPU: NXP Layerscape LS1046A, 4 cores, 1.6 GHz

RAM: 8 GB, 2100 MT/s, ECC support

Networking: 2x SFP+ 10 Gb, 3x RJ-45 1 Gb

Wifi (I think not included?): 1x M.2 Key-E connector for Wifi 6.0 2x2 MU-MIMO, 1x M.2 Key-E connector for tri-radio (Wifi 5.0, Bluetooth, Thread)

Storage: 32 GB eMMC for Operating System, 64 MB NOR flash for Bootloader

Debugging: JTAG connector, 100+ test points throughout the PCB, UART USB-C port, Status RGB LED

Power: USB-C PD 3.0

Connectivity: 1x USB-C 3.0 port

Active cooling support: Yes, 2 4-pin PWM 5V fan headers

 

 

There are many routers out there. From a Raspberry Pi all the way up to that above.

I always say, if you know Linux/BSD well, PFsense, OPNSense or OpenWRT is a great tool.

@BudManmay be able to help here.

 

[Moved to Networking]

On 12/11/2025 at 16:00, Mindovermaster said:

There are many routers out there. From a Raspberry Pi all the way up to that above.

I always say, if you know Linux/BSD well, PFsense, OPNSense or OpenWRT is a great tool.

@BudManmay be able to help here.

 

[Moved to Networking]

I am afraid I don't know Linux at all, I am always keen on learning something new, I just need to find some time haha. pfSense and OPNsense are the ones I was recommended to look at, but I haven't got any hardware for now. I'll get something during Black Friday this year to experiment with perhaps, but what I have right now is enough for me really. It is 7 clients and they are all wireless except for the desktop which I have wired, the ISP box handles them all well.

Thank you for moving the post by the way! I was unsure where to write it. I chose the hardware section ultimately because it was about a piece of hardware, so it felt apt, I hadn't seen there was a section for networking.

On 12/11/2025 at 14:41, Carlisle R. said:

afraid I don't know Linux at all, I am always keen on learning something new

What does not knowing linux have to do with pfsense or that other one. Both are modified freebsd distros. ;)

Both are gui based firewall router distros - ie a web gui. You don't have to know anything about linux or freebsd to use them.  Can you follow a bouncing ball install? Where you answer yes/no sort of questions, or put in some info. Have you ever installed windows or macos? The install just not as pretty looking ;)

Once either of them are installed - its pretty much just a gui. Sure you can go to the prompt and run some stuff - but you should never really have to do that. Just like with windows or macOS.  How often do you use command line with them.. Sure you can, but how many users even know you can use commandline to do stuff in windows. 

You understand all the soho wifi routers are running some linux variant.. You just use the gui they provide to manage them - pfsense and that other one same thing.

  • Love 1
On 13/11/2025 at 11:49, BudMan said:

What does not knowing linux have to do with pfsense or that other one. Both are modified freebsd distros. ;)

Both are gui based firewall router distros - ie a web gui. You don't have to know anything about linux or freebsd to use them.  Can you follow a bouncing ball install? Where you answer yes/no sort of questions, or put in some info. Have you ever installed windows or macos? The install just not as pretty looking ;)

Once either of them are installed - its pretty much just a gui. Sure you can go to the prompt and run some stuff - but you should never really have to do that. Just like with windows or macOS.  How often do you use command line with them.. Sure you can, but how many users even know you can use commandline to do stuff in windows. 

You understand all the soho wifi routers are running some linux variant.. You just use the gui they provide to manage them - pfsense and that other one same thing.

I didn't even know pfSense wasn't Linux! 🤦

I will get something to play with soon and see how it all goes. Back when I was looking into learning about networking my home network was a bit different, the ISP had given me a single "box" where the fiber cable plugged in and it did everything, wired and wireless networking. That's when I was told it could be difficult to add anything like that to the network because I would need the credentials that the box the ISP gave me had to authenticate in the fiber side of things, or that it would only work with that hardware because it was using its MAC address for authentication, something along those lines, I am afraid I don't recall. I remember looking a bit into it, but the web UI wasn't showing anything like that.

I suppose my mind got stuck in "those custom router setups are tricky" and never looked into it again. Nowadays I have two units provided by the ISP, one where the fiber cable is plugged in, and from that box there is a wired Ethernet cable that goes to the router and WiFi AP one, so it should be easier.

Even if the isp device(s) do their thing, you could quite often put it in to bridge mode, where it doesn't do any nat and provides a public IP to the router device you plug into it.  Even if you can not put it into bridge mode you could run in a double nat mode.  Not the best possible solution, but works - and unless your wanting to do something a bit off the beaten path a double nat shouldn't be a problem.

 

 

Depending how DIY you wish to get, you could certainly put something small together for less than $600 that will support 10GbE nics.

The Lenovo Tiny 1L Mini PC's for example make great pfSense / OPNsense devices for the home.
What's special about these is you can get a PCIe riser for certain models, such as the Lenovo M720q. This allows you to install either a 4x 1GbE, 4x 2.5GbE or 2x 10GbE nic. - perfect for a low powered router / firewall.

If you do decide that's something which interest you, the thread here is a great reference for PCIe hardware supported by the various Lenovo Mini PC's: https://forums.servethehome.com/index.php?threads/lenovo-thinkcentre-thinkstation-tiny-project-tinyminimicro-reference-thread.34925/

I've got a Lenovo M720q with an Intel i350-T4 v2 nic. This has just worked for years, only ever rebooting when theirs a new version of pfSense.

If I ever get internet faster than 1Gbps I can just upgrade the nic and keep using my current hardware.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!