For All ice hockey Fans out there


  

41 members have voted

  1. 1. For All ice hockey Fans out there

    • United States
      15
    • Canada
      13
    • Sweden
      6
    • Czech(sulvakia)
      2
    • Finland
      0
    • Germany
      1
    • Russia
      4


Recommended Posts

top 3 qualifying game really dont do it, Russia and Canada have the most Talent in thier team, Russia have utilized it, Canada havent, thier chances will depend solely on how they do against Czech today, but u gotta remember. Finland is a strong team too, and it lost both its matches

Czech(sulvakia)

If you know your history and Geography then you would know that the Czechs and the Slovaks are two different peoples in two different countries. They used to be part of Czechoslovakia.

CANADA sucks because we have too many old men and no real system to play with. They are all too busy playing with the puck. They should be playing a cross-dump system for forecheking and establish the blue-line. Then we can dink around with the puck and make the fancy passes once we are in their zone. A 1-4 wouldn't be bad. Canada is playing without a heart.

The canadian sports system is so full of politics. A lot of our athletes are in their twilight or past that stage and we need to give the new comers and the younger athletes a chance. Gretzky picked every one he played with or against. He is RETIRED!!! He needed to pick some quality players perhaps without the biggest names but with the biggest hearts!

Go Canada GO!

Don't worry, Canada seem to be trailing a little, but they always come back in the end.

Well maybe not always:D

Support your team. Victory is gonna be sweeter.

But defeat will be bitter. It's all about learning to lose gracefully.

Anyway, it's the Olympics...any event requiring a skating rink already have a pre-decided winner:P :D

BTW, Martin Brodeur lives about 15 minutes from my house! So Canada had better win or I'll kick his a**! :evil:

OLYMPIC MEN'S HOCKEY STANDINGS

THROUGH MONDAY, FEBRUARY 18

CHAMPIONSHIP ROUND

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

GROUP C GP W L T PTS GF GA

------- -- --- --- --- --- -- --

SWEDEN 3 3 0 0 6 14 04

CZECH REPUBLIC 3 1 1 1 3 12 07

CANADA 3 1 1 1 3 08 10

GERMANY 3 0 3 0 0 05 18

GROUP D GP W L T PTS GF GA

------- -- --- --- --- --- -- --

UNITED STATES 3 2 0 1 5 16 03

FINLAND 3 2 1 1 4 11 08

RUSSIA 3 1 1 1 3 09 09

BELARUS 3 0 3 0 0 06 22

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!