What do you like the most about Linux.


What is the best thing about Linux YOU like the most?  

72 members have voted

  1. 1. What is the best thing about Linux YOU like the most?

    • FREE
      22
    • Stable
      7
    • Easy and Cool
      2
    • Open Source
      11
    • Lots of Distros
      4
    • Powerful
      15
    • 99% Bug Free
      1
    • Less Headache
      4
    • Non-Microsoft
      6


Recommended Posts

linux is not bug free :)

Just several hours ago I had to mess around with some ebuilds in gentoo to get pango to compile. fun times.

I really prefer linux because it allows me to use my computer to its full potential. I always felt limited in windows. Not to mention that linux is stable, fast, and has the ability to look far better than windows.

:)

What I like most about Linux is the freedom you have. Linux can be made to look like just about anything and can run on almost any hardware. With linux you can customize and tweak it to your exact tastes. Windows lacks this same level of freedom that you have with linux. Sure it is far more difficult to get to grips with, but the time invested in learning Linux is so very rewarding. Unlike windows, linux does not try to hide the inner workings of the OS from you, so if you like to get your hands dirty, and enjoy finding out just how your operating system works then Linux is perfect.

99% Bug Free?

Hahaha, it is full of bugs, maybe you don't see most of them, but just like every other OS it contains bugs.... and lots of them.

They face the surface sooner in Windows because like 90% of the people in this world use it and it is the main platform for hackers to attack. I'm pretty sure that MacOSX or Linux isn't much better....

Anyways, I like Linux (installed Fedora) because it is free and still does a decent job.

I guess what I like most about Linux is that (for the most part) it's a collection of very simple elements. It's easy to learn any given "chunks" of a Linux based OS and then you can string them together to do very powerful results. I find that to be very elegant, and I find myself more functional with tools that do one thing, but do it well.

Other systems (ie:Windows) are built on top of very complex systems with very simple interfaces - for some reason I just don't feel at home on such a system. I also get frustrated with tools that do many things, but not particularly well.

EDIT:

free: it's nice but I pay for my *NIXs of choice to support future development.

Free: It's a lovely ideology, but if something noticeably better came along and was not Free - I wouldn't think twice about using it.

Easy and Cool: Cool...I just don't think anyone (aside from geeks) think that a *NIX system is cool.

Open Source: Again, it's nice - but I have only tweaked on the source code a few times, that's not enough to make it a deal-breaker for me. It's one of those 'parts' that make the whole more.

Powerful: There are other powerful operating systems too. Contrary to popular belief windows server products have proven themselves in major companies. Solaris is no slouch either.

Bug Free: HAHAHA

Less headaches: Compared to what? I have fewer problems with Linux machines than I do with Windows machines, but I have fewer still with BSD based systems. Some things you just can't get rid of - like checking logs, backups, and patching/upgrading.

Non-microsoft: I'm not a big fan of their business practices so I don't buy their products and I don't use them if I don't have to. This isn't really a plus for Linux, it's a hit against microsoft.

Edited by the evn show

To be honest, the initial thing that attracted me to Linux was that it's free. I'm not the richest person out there, and I'd rather be 100% legal than either be in debt buying the software I need just to function and do my homework (Windows, Office, Visual Studio, Photoshop, Flash, etc etc), or pirate nearly everything I run. Even with the educational discounts, the software I need costs approximately 1.5x (or more, now) what my computer costs. I'd much rather buy a new computer.

So, with that in mind, I installed linux. And, I was and am absolutely blown away by it. The amount of choice available is just incredible, as is the customizability and power that goes along with this os. Granted, I've had a few little bumps along the way, but I love how this OS doesn't treat you like a clueless newbie. The community is great (at least at Neowin and Gentoo, which have helped me solve about all of my problems). It's really exciting also to follow projects as they're being developed, somewhat of a rarity on windows.

I think MS is doing a great job with their products, allowing nearly anyone to use a computer. I have nothing against them, just, I believe that Linux and its associated software programs are far better than windows.

the evn show: "Non-microsoft: I'm not a big fan of their business practices so I don't buy their products and I don't use them if I don't have to. This isn't really a plus for Linux, it's a hit against microsoft."

Atlas: "I like it because it's not Microsoft. "

I really with that both of you would grow up and think more openly about such matters.

I wouldn't know as my linux installations go bad almost instantly after setup.

STV

Powerful: There are other powerful operating systems too.  Contrary to popular belief windows server products have proven themselves in major companies.

Windows Server is indeed a very powerful os. I run Window Server 2003 at home and it's an amazing os.

Behold the power of Windows!! (yes, I know I have too much free time :rofl: )

Windows running 9 os's

Windows running 5 os's and 30 or so apps

The thing I like the most about Linux is learning new things.

The thing I like the least is not having apps like Dreamweaver Mx 2004, Office 2003, Sound Forge 7....

One of the things I love about Linux is the user base and documentation. Every nook and cranny of the Linux OS is documented in one way or another. Whenever there is a problem you can almost guarantee there's a documented solution, or at least explanation on why the problem is occuring. The last two things that are great about Linux is the constant development and the power that Linux has as a server and a workstation, it's just lacking in a lot of decent software on the workstation side of things at the moment.

I answered free, but that's not entirely it. I really like the whole collaborative effort thing. People across the world working together to come up with something really good, all for free. I also think it's really cool that something that started out as a school project has turned into such a huge deal.

ok, I could have voted for any of the reasons, but really I love it because it is FAR LESS HEADACHE. Once you get your system up, it just runs, and runs perfectly (unless you're an idiot who kills it...I have a few times but have always been able to fix it without re-install). If Windows messes up, can you go and open up the system files in a text editor? no...it's doubtful you can even access the windows partition if it is too messed to boot.

Another thing I LOVE about it is battery life in laptops. Mine lasts 2 hours MAX in windows (idling basically) but it's lasted 6 hours doing large compilations in linux. Why the difference? No idea, makes no sense to me, but I know it does it so I don't care why.

Only thing I don't like about nix is the availability of games and good audio recording/engineering programs.

I love the battery life it gives me for my laptop i love that its free and i love that its stable but HATE! the driver support for my video card ( not everything is perfect) i hate the wireless support , lack of video editiing support ( although their are alternatives) missing Mpeg audio support (now in all distros) , linux is going down hill lol

definitelly the power aspect.. Windows (XP) is already free, stable, bug-free, easy and cool and less-headache for me..

i intend to use Linux mainly because of the mind-numbingly high choice aspect and power.. by power, i mean you can practically have it do or perform for you anything you'd like.. command-line is a very powerful medium, moreso than a GUI..

also, add the fact that you don't need to worry about viruses, fragmentation or security exploits Windows users suffer constantly, and i can easily overcome the difficulties and headaches it takes to install and time to adjust to a different system..

(Y)

One of the inportant things for me as a reason why i like it is the resource usage. The fact that any given time, depending on whats installed you can have 40 processes running and your utilizing near only 10-15% of your RAM, and virtually no CPU unless your compiling, XP with 40+ processes is deadly....I have my XP down to 25-27 running processes and still it doesnt run as smoothly as nux. I also like tweaking out the dtops and functionality of the different WMs...which in order to do in WinXP you'd have to install 3,000 apps or crack a few hundred system files.

I really with that both of you would grow up and think more openly about such matters.

How do you propose I grow up? Blindly support a company that is anti-completive, illegally abuses it's position as a monopoly, and has a track record of profits before security? I also don't care at all for their practice of embrace-extend-break for standards (ie: CSS in internet explorer annoys me on a daily basis).

Sorry, I'm one of those people who doesn't support companies unless they earn it. Microsoft just doesn't do it.

They have some excellent products (word, and visual studio) but the way they act as a business is not something I can support.

They have some excellent products (word, and visual studio) but the way they act as a business is not something I can support.

this way of thinking will get in your way. you say you wont use their products unless you have to, but doesnt that still breaks the limits that you have set for yourself (i.e. not to use MICROSOFT products). you either accept them and use their products or dont accept them and not use their products. The business aspect of their image should have nothing to do with the software aspect of it.

I dont want to start a flame war because that is just not a good way to converse with another person.

I do respect your limits on such matters but I dont understand how you cant see that Microsoft is changing, believe it or not. I think that people, such as yourself, should give them more open and accept them.

STV

I don't care about most of the options.

I don't care if it's free, I can afford Windows. Windows XP hasn't crashed on me for over a year, and that crash was my fault, so stability isn't the reason I use it. It is not easy, and I don't care about being cool. I don't make my software choice an almost political issue, so I don't care about open source. For the bug free issue refer to the stablity answer. I've had more headaches in my 6 months or so of solid Linux use than I've had in all the time I've had this computer on Windows. And I couldn't care less is something is a Microsoft product or not.

What I like most is XFT text rendering, easy on the eyes. That and a choice in interfaces, all you can change in Windows is your shell, here almost anything can be changed.

What I dislike is the lack of transparency in X, though it's being worked on now. I also think the number of distros can slow development on some things too. If there were fewer distros each one could theoretically have more people working on it, and maybe things would move even faster.

You say you wont use their products unless you have to, but doesnt that still breaks the limits that you have set for yourself (i.e. not to use MICROSOFT products).

You've got PM, so I'll keep this brief.

I make my living writing code and doing design; I can't control what the people who pay me are using at their offices, so if they want to pay me to use a copy of VisualStudio or Windows, or Microsoft BOB I can bite the bullet.

Furthermore - why are you pushing me for an absolute stance one way or another? Last check, I was free to run or not run whatever software I want, for any reason I want (even because My dog told me to) provided. If you're looking for a flaw in my convictions: knock yourself out - I can assure you they're unlikely to change because random Q internet guy thinks I'm being unfair to a company because I don't like the way they operate.

you either accept them and use their products or dont accept them and not use their products.

With 90%+ market share it's impossible to have nothing to do with Microsoft. It's like trying to breath only the oxygen molecules in the air: there's just too much nitrogen for that to be possible.

In my house I don't have a single Windows machine - and the huge collection of software Microsoft gives to me every year (as a student) is sitting in a briefcase in a closet in my basement - only to be used if there's no other way around it (ie: I have a course that requires MFC/C++ at school). I have the freedom to make that choice there - so I do.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yes, THIS is wordart, not the styling that can now be done. Wordart was all about those curvy words, that you could change the path of, like making words go around a circle. I don't think it can be done now, right?
    • Just saw a news report of a Waymo driving into a flooded road.
    • Password Safe 3.72.0 by Razvan Serea Password Safe is a password database utility. Like many other such products, commercial and otherwise, it stores your passwords in an encrypted file, allowing you to remember only one password (the "safe combination"), instead of all the username/password combinations that you use. Once stored, your user names and passwords are just a few clicks away. Using Password Safe you can organize your passwords using your own customizable references—for example, by user ID, category, web site, or location. You can choose to store all your passwords in a single encrypted master password list (an encrypted password database), or use multiple databases to further organize your passwords (work and home, for example). And with its intuitive interface you will be up and running in minutes. PasswordSafe was originally designed by the renowned security technologist Bruce Schneier and released as a free utility application. Password Safe 3.72.0 changelog: Fixed bugs Improved font scale handling - should resolve font size issues on high resolution displays. GH1749 In the Master Password Setup window, "Show Master Password" is no longer truncated on some displays. GH1092, SF1595 Size and position of main window is now correctly restored on scaled displays. SF1630 Keep password expiry date when both password and password expiry are changed; don't clear a non-recurring expiry when the password's changed. SF1628 Custom values can now be copied to the clipboard in read-only mode via Ctrl-C and right-click->Copy Value. New features GH1196 Dark display mode support: Password Safe now supports the system display mode, as well as setting the mode directly via Manage->Options->Display->Display Mode. This change also updates the general "look & feel" of the app to the current Windows theme. Known limitations: The Date picker and keyboard shortcut controls do not switch to dark theme The Customize Toolbar dialog does not switch to dark theme Custom Field support has been added to the more advanced features: Filters XML and Text import and export Comparison, Sync and Merge databases SF938 Custom field values may now be selected by name and copied via a "Copy Custom Field Value..." submenu in the entry context popup menu. SF936 Notes and Custom fields layout now overlap, selectable by tabs, resulting in a more compact and less cluttered layout. SF935 Autotype: Specifying '\v{name}' in the autotype text will cause the corresponding value to be autotyped. Download: PasswordSafe 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: PasswordSafe 32-bit | Portable 32-bit View: PasswordSafe Website | Quickstart Guide | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Google DeepMind published a document on June 18, 2026, that may be the most consequential admission yet from a frontier AI lab: alignment training alone cannot guarantee that AI agents will remain under human control, so structural containment must be built before more capable models arrive.............. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318758/20260620/google-deepmind-ai-control-roadmap-when-alignment-fails-defense-depth-takes-over.htm  
    • I've got a SoundBlasterX G6 that I use in my streaming setup. Sounds great to me and I've had zero issues with the ancient software package so far in Win11. That G6 has 7.1, Dolby, fully working SPDIF and since it's a USB device it's outside of my rig so I don't have to worry about EMF distortion. Looks like for now this is a pass for me as I think I have better hardware....
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!