A Guide to Recompiling the Kernel


Recommended Posts

I got a kernel panic :oops: :D

Couldnt mount the hard drive or something, which i imagine is pretty serious :p Im sure it just needs a little bit more care and adaptation from me, and i'll try later, but if anyone has any tips that would be appreciated.

Oh, by the way, im using SuSE and have been told that i shouldnt of just compiled 2.6.0 randomly and needed a SuSE-adapted kernel. How correct is this? Sounds a load of rubbish to me

The distro-specific kernels often have patches applied to them that the distro maker thinks need to be there. However it is entirely possible to get a non-distro kernel to load correctly. However jumping from a 2.4 kernel to a 2.6 kernel in many distros involves more than just upgrading the kernel. So far the only distro that I have had near complete success with doing that is slackware.

A major cause of kernel panics is an improperly configured kernel and not the kernel itself. You should be able to get a 2.6 kernel to load on almost any 2.4 based distro and get it to load, however somethings might not work correctly. I don't know the specifics on suse on how to get a 2.6 kernel to work with it, however I am positive that somewhere there is documentation on how to do it.

My totally uneducated and unfounded conclusion is that it is to do with my boot loader settings. I basically ripped the current one and changed it where i saw fit but I did it in an excited and hurried state, i'll try and boot up back into 2.4 and see if i can fix it

Good tutorial btw (Y) I had never made it this far before!

make install will not update lilo or grub automatically.

lilo you need to run /sbin/lilo to recycle the config once you have added the proper values in the lilo.conf file, grub, i dunno just add the correct values in the grub.conf file and youll have to restart anyways for th ekernel upgrade it will show up in the grub menu then. lilo on the other hand is different.

make install will install the kernel for fedora. And it adds an extra entry. It will also install for suse, however an extra entry isn't added to grub and it overwrites the last entry. In fact make install is the best way to install it in gentoo. However this won't work on every distro off the bat for grub, but it can be configured to (I don't know how). I haven't had any success with make install and lilo.

I got a kernel panic :oops: :D

Couldnt mount the hard drive or something, which i imagine is pretty serious :p Im sure it just needs a little bit more care and adaptation from me, and i'll try later, but if anyone has any tips that would be appreciated.

Oh, by the way, im using SuSE and have been told that i shouldnt of just compiled 2.6.0 randomly and needed a SuSE-adapted kernel. How correct is this? Sounds a load of rubbish to me

You probably forgot to enable reiserfs support or whichever fs you are using ... they're not all enabled by default. Hope this helps.

gentoo you can't do make install without a little bit of effort. It really isn't worth it for gentoo, however with fedora it makes an initrd and appends it to the grub automatically. I believe that in order for fedora to properly function it needs this, and it is far easier just to let the make install make and install it.

I think I enabled support for all file systems! Is this bad? Is there a way that I can find out what FS I am using? And also how do i find the hard drive that it should load from? I believe that its hda6 on my computer but thats a bit weird as i have one hard drive :s

  • 3 months later...

after doing;

make bzImage && make install modules modules_install

i didn't get the results I needed - probably because I needed to move some files from the usr/src directory (maybe an addition for the how-to?)

so I did the following -> make rpm

and it did (after taking a hour) and places it in /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/ (and a src.rpm in /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/)

so I was able to rpm the kernel (rpm -ihv kernel-..)

and I found a vmlinux matching the kernel version in /boot

and after that I needed to make a custom initrd using /sbin/initrd -something- (on a winbox now.. :rolleyes: ) because I have a RAID controller card installed..

manually edited the /boot/grub/grub.conf file

(copied previous linux startup line's and adjusted accordingly)

et voila :happy: new kernel up and running

it takes a bit longer but it worked twice for me..

  • 2 months later...

it would be good if someone went over make menuconfig since lots of people are having problems with kernel panics and such. also, is there any way you can find .config files that are ready to go without make menuconfig? i'm sure that would make life a little bit easier for some.

  • 2 weeks later...

after the kernel is put in /usr/src/ i make a symlink from the new kernel dir to linux.

then i copy my old .config to the new directory.

I then run a make menuconfig to check over the options

I then mount my /boot partition.

I then run this command: make; make modules modules_install install

I also run gentoo and grub as my bootloader as i find it is more robust than lilo.

btw, i have an old .config here: http://3nd3r.info/.config

  • 4 weeks later...

Is it possible to save the current configuration of my precompiled kernel that came with Mepis and works beautifully with my hardware, and be able to use it with a newer self-compiled kernel? That way I can take out what I know for sure I don't need and yet still maintain a fully functional kernel that supports my needs.I have compiled from scratch with Gentoo before, but I really would rather not get into that again since it can be frustrating

  • 5 months later...
  • 5 months later...
tar -xzvf linux-2.6.0.tar.gz

cd linux-2.6.0

make menuconfig

After your machine takes a bit of time to compose the menus, you should see the Linux kernel menu system. The menu gives you the ability to choose which options are included in your kernel. After choosing these options, you'll be able to compile your kernel.

Compiling the kernel

First, type in the following.

make bzImage

If you use LILO as your boot manager, then type the following.

make install

If you configured your kernel to use modules, which many people want to do, you'll need to type in the following command.

make modules

make modules_install

This wont work, the proper way is to check your current .conf file of your distro, most distros uses specific options, like the initrd ramdisk size, SuSE uses automount for example.

The proper way is to always use

make clean && make mrproper

Never asume that the kernel is clean after a download!

Check if you use make menuconfig that it doesn't load your current .conf file, move it if necessary, otherwise you get all kinds of depraced warnings.

A distro kernel is a modified kernel with other options the vanilla kernel hasn't.

if you are ready and modified the kernel do

make bzImage

make modules

make modules_install

Then do make install.

Check the grub.conf

Remove the symlinks in the /boot dir and create new ones and point them to the old kernel.

reboot

  • 3 months later...
  • Mindovermaster unpinned this topic
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Of course the problem was Secure Boot's new certificates. Install media created by the official Media Creation Tool is already signed with a valid certificate from Microsoft, so maybe that certificate isn't "up-to-date" enough for machines with the new ones installed in the UEFI. There's really no other logical explanation.
    • Here is how I fixed Windows 11 not booting after clean installation by Taras Buria Story time. A couple of weeks ago, I experienced a very odd thing with my computers. I was trying to reinstall Windows 11 on my primary device, and everything was going smoothly until the installer performed the first restart. After that, my computer entered the boot disk selection screen instead of continuing the setup process. Huh, that's odd, said I, and selected Windows Boot Manager only to see it fall back into the same screen right away. Then I tried booting from the USB drive with the same result—the PC kept returning to the boot device selection screen, and removing the drive would send my PC to UEFI, again, with no way to launch Windows 11. I fired up my spare laptop, which has been sitting unused for quite a while, to see if I am dealing with a defective USB drive. Nope, Windows 11 installed and started without issues. After trying another drive and checking all the possible settings in UEFI, I decided to try disabling Secure Boot. Lo and behold, Windows 11 started as it should have been in the first place, continued the setup process, and reached the initial setup screen. Victory! After I finished the setup and applied all updates, I re-enabled Secure Boot, and Windows 11 started without issues. Some time later, I tried reinstalling Windows 11 on my laptop only to experience similar issues, with UEFI claiming a Secure Boot violation. I checked whether the drive works on my main PC, and yes, it installed Windows 11 without errors. I scratched my head, went to UEFI, turned off Secure Boot, and installed Windows 11 without issues. After that, I enabled Secure Boot. Note: I used the official Media Creation Tool app for my USB drive. Also, UEFI was properly configured for Windows 11, including no Legacy Mode, a GPT-partitioned drive, and TPM and Secure Boot enabled. From my experience, if you are dealing with similar symptoms, I recommend two things: If you use old Windows 11 install media, create a new one with the latest Windows 11 release, especially if you know your PC already has the latest Secure Boot certificates. If you cannot create a new one, turn off Secure Boot, complete the installation, download all available updates, and then re-enable Secure Boot in UEFI. Note that you need to turn off Secure Boot after installing Windows 11. Otherwise, the installer won't run, claiming a hardware requirements mismatch. I believe the problem hides in Secure Boot certificates that expire this month. Microsoft is currently rolling out new certificates, and maybe a mismatch was causing these issues for both of my systems. I am out of my depth to make a definitive statement; this article is flagged as "Opinion," as I only share my experience and some tips on how to fix the problem. If some of you possess deeper knowledge and understanding of the situation, please share it in the comments. As for everyone else struggling with computers not booting after a clean install, the two steps above should get you out of the pickle.
    • I gave the tool a chance the other day to make a USB. An hour later it was stuck at 0% downloaded. I downloaded the official ISO, downloaded Rufus, and made the USB myself in 15 min.
    • <Moved to software discussion and support> I've got fond memories of Winamp. Changing the skins, the different visualisations etc. But now I just need a simple music player. MSN messenger would be another one, MSN Messenger Plus (I think?) offered so many different plugins. But again, it probably wouldn't work for me these days. And then there is miRC. i think it's still going these days, but lord i had fun with that back in the day. Now it's mostly stuff like Discord, WhatsApp group chats, Signal, Telegram... /me is showing his age...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!