xpsp2's firewall - how good is it?


Recommended Posts

a question, especially for the folks that've installed the rc1 build of xp's sp2: have you gone to a website that will run a firewall scan/test and checked out the results? if so, how well did it turn out? is the built-in firewall going to be good enough to replace something like zonealarm?

ok, that turned out to be 3 questions, but c'mon... ;)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/150233-xpsp2s-firewall-how-good-is-it/
Share on other sites

I'd say it's pretty good, though it's up to you wether or not you replace ZoneAlarm. It is better than the previous version, along with many UI changes. It also is running during bootup, while the previous one wasn't, so you were vulnerable for a few secs on bootup.

The built in firewall will never replace a commercial firewall product. No matter what you do with ICF, it will only block incoming traffic, so if you have a trojan installed--tough luck.

Plus, commercial firewalls have extensive logging to show you all the interesting traffic on your line. ICF is silent.

so powerful i couldnt connect to the net while i had SP2 installed! lol

If it did that to everyone, it would provide the best protection of all :yes:

No matter what you do with ICF, it will only block incoming traffic, so if you have a trojan installed--tough luck.

I'm sorry but this statement is flat out incorrect. The SP2 Windows Firewall does block both incoming and outgoing traffic. When an application attempt to access the internet, Windows Firewall WILL inform you, and gives the option to allow it to do so, or block it.

a question, especially for the folks that've installed the rc1 build of xp's sp2: have you gone to a website that will run a firewall scan/test and checked out the results? if so, how well did it turn out? is the built-in firewall going to be good enough to replace something like zonealarm?

ok, that turned out to be 3 questions, but c'mon... ;)

It's a lot better than not using one at all.

I'm sorry but this statement is flat out incorrect.  The SP2 Windows Firewall does block both incoming and outgoing traffic.  When an application attempt to access the internet, Windows Firewall WILL inform you, and gives the option to allow it to do so, or block it.

DOH! Of course, I killed my ICF, and I didnt even realize it.. Geez.

Sorry for the misinformation guys. I retract my statements.

i just got a perfect stealth scan with ICF and shildsup...

I don't know about all of the microsoft bashers here, but I think they may have got it right this time, as i feel no need to reinstall ZAP

Don't allow ShieldsUP! to be the sole tool you use to compare Windows Firewall to ZoneAlarm Pro: there are many more things to consider when comparing them.

Well, I dunno. :laugh: It's 3 A.M. :rofl:

Just think about it. Do you want the many more advanced features of a commercial firewall, or will you be satisfied with Windows' own simpler version?

To be honest i dont think I could want any more features from a firewall than the winxp one. It has:

  • Configurable Options
  • Outbound Blocking
  • Inbound Blocking
  • Logging
  • Full stealth scan good
  • Total Intergration into OS

Seems enough for me :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      149
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!