Weird issue with CHKDSK on bootup


Recommended Posts

Here is a weird issue I am having with Windows XP Home and CHKDSK on bootup. Very often Diskeeper reports to me that my drive has some inconsistancies and that I need to run CHKDSK /F to fix them. Whenever I try to run this from either Windows, or from a command prompt in windows, it will say there are errors with the volume bitmap and that I will need to run CHKDSK on bootup to fix them (because it doesn't have complete access to the drive.) So I have it schedule the CHKDSK, and on bootup it does it, fixes the errors, reboots itself, and then it locks up on a blank screen right after the Windows XP logo goes off of the screen. My monitor light stays green, however, my screen is completely blank. So what I have to do is reboot, select "Last good known configuration." At this point it seems to load up okay. Has anybody else had this issue or one similar to it? Any ideas on what I can try to fix it?

Here is my system specs:

Athlon XP 1900+ (1.6)

ASUS KT266-E

SB Audigy Platinum

2 IDE 60 GB IBM HDD's in a RAID 0 array (one LARGE NTFS partition.)

3Com 3CR990-TX-97

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/15043-weird-issue-with-chkdsk-on-bootup/
Share on other sites

try doing chkdsk /v /f /r

it will show more detailed error msgs and will also do more detailed scan.

also it's not really good to have diskeeper defrag every time on reboot.

i have similar problem with my hd. very often when i run chkdsk it says i have some "minor" inconsistancies. after /f everything is fine, but then even 10min later i get those errors again..same thing happened when i ran Win2k..really annoying:dead:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That's helpful, thanks. The key issue as I see it is that the issuer of the verification is still getting that request from WhateverNaughty.com, which immediately becomes a problem if this is a government issuer, etc. but it's a huge problem for any user with any issuer. I guess the solution, and maybe this goes without saying and I've missed it in your fine posts, is that the requester is also anonymized. That way, the issuer doesn't have a record of X person requested verification for Y website. And anyone who hacks that data is going to get precisely nothing. This only works is, as you say, this is a one-time challenge each time, and we all agree that no one is keeping/storing that data for any use anyway. After all, "is this person 18+ age" would only respond Yes/No, which is hardly actionable by anyone...as long as the asker only gets Yes/No and the Answerer doesn't know or care who's asking. :) Are both ends anonymized?
    • It definitely can be especially if you live in a dorm or frat/sorority house during your time in college. However, for many who live at home or in their own off campus residence and commute to classes it can be just about the classes. That is how it was for me. Except for classes, time in the library and some time in the student union mostly for eating and taking a break between classes, I was never on compus
    • As one person commented on my use of my old Pocophone, they are also MP3 players.
    • They do not. I know this personally, but let's use some evidence instead. For example, Europe and other nations aren't drenched in neverending ads like we are (think soccer being the most popular world sport and yet there are no ads during/delaying the gameplay itself, unlike every sport in America). The truth is that it's all just a ridiculous shell game between marketing/ad people who want to keep their jobs and websites/networks who want to keep charging for air time for ads to be funded. And, of course, the enshittification of everything for ever increasing quarterly returns for Wall Street only matters here, not everywhere else. We all know that consumers ignore commercials and block the ads now, so we know it doesn't lead to enough sales to justify this cashola merry-go-round. But they are still thinking like this is still the good old days of TV and, quite frankly, they don't know any better... The better solution, of course, is sponsorship -- a way of advertising your product and associations in a meaningful way, without bombarding annoyed consumers with the same damn ad for the same damn product at every single forced commercial break.
    • That is also my understanding of Apple's support for their older devices.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Celilo earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      K.I.S.S. earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      solidox earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      solidox earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Devesh Beri earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      447
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      166
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      153
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      66
    5. 5
      macoman
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!