Recommended Posts

Instructions in the readme file "important.txt"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<< DirectX 9 Uninstaller for XP / .NET >>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This uninstaller uses your original XP or .NET CD to restore your original DirectX 8 files.

Extract these files to C:\DXTEMP! You must extract these files to this directory and run

the UnDx9.bat that uninstalls the DIrectX files in SAFE MODE. Enjoy!

--GxV of #betas

Instructions in the readme file "important.txt"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<< DirectX 9 Uninstaller for XP / .NET >>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This uninstaller uses your original XP or .NET CD to restore your original DirectX 8 files.

Extract these files to C:\DXTEMP! You must extract these files to this directory and run

the UnDx9.bat that uninstalls the DIrectX files in SAFE MODE. Enjoy!

--GxV of #betas

Well I have my XP cd but I cant find c:\dxtemp!

:huh: You have to extract the files from the .rar to a folder on your c: drivre that's wrote c:\dxtemp and execute the batch file from there. These files are not on the XP cd, they are the files that you extract !!! :whistle: The XP cd is restoring DX8 files.

btw : I did not make this. It was posted long ago.

:huh: You have to extract the files from the .rar to a folder on your c: drivre that's wrote c:\dxtemp and execute the batch file from there. These files are not on the XP cd, they are the files that you extract !!! :whistle:

btw : I did not make this. It was posted long ago.

So do I have to switch to safe mode before install and running the batch

Oh Geez. Yeah, why can't someone do with their macjine what they want?

Here you go. Remove these system32 files and DirectX is gone.

amstream.dll

bdaplgin.ax

d3d8.dll

d3d8thk.dll

d3d9.dll

d3dim.dll

d3dim700.dll

d3dpmesh.dll

d3dramp.dll

d3drm.dll

d3dxof.dll

ddraw.dll

ddrawex.dll

devenum.dll

diactfrm.dll

dimap.dll

dinput.dll

dinput8.dll

dmband.dll

dmcompos.dll

dmime.dll

dmloader.dll

dmscript.dll

dmstyle.dll

dmsynth.dll

dmusic.dll

dplaysvr.exe

dplayx.dll

dpmodemx.dll

dpnaddr.dll

dpnet.dll

dpnhpast.dll

dpnhupnp.dll

dpnlobby.dll

dpnsvr.exe

dpvacm.dll

dpvoice.dll

dpvsetup.exe

dpvvox.dll

dpwsockx.dll

dsdmo.dll

dsdmoprp.dll

dsound.dll

dsound3d.dll

dswave.dll

dx7vb.dll

dx8vb.dll

dxdiag.exe

dxdiagn.dll

dxdllreg.exe

encapi.dll

gcdef.dll

ipsink.ax

joy.cpl

ksolay.ax

ksproxy.ax

kstvtune.ax

ksuser.dll

kswdmcap.ax

ksxbar.ax

l3codecx.ax

mciqtz32.dll

mpeg2data.ax

mpg2splt.ax

msdmo.dll

msdvbnp.ax

msvidctl.dll

mswebdvd.dll

msyuv.dll

pid.dll

psisdecd.dll

psisrndr.ax

qcap.dll

qdv.dll

qdvd.dll

qedit.dll

qedwipes.dll

quartz.dll

vbisurf.ax

wstdecod.dll

80 file(s)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The problem of course is simply that government does not always know best. My point is that agency is taken away from the EU consumer in these cases. I'm sorry, but I do not believe that governments (politicians) are inherently good, and "looking out for me." Primarily they look to themselves and their own personal desires first, foremost, and always. When the EU or the DOJ fines these companies, claiming to "represent the welfare of the consumer," how much of these billion-dollar judgments are handed to the consumers they claim to represent? Not even a dollar, as I've seen. Yet the EUC lawyers who are paid to sit around and dream up these suits make huge commissions on the fines the EUC adjudicates, which is an ironclad fact I hope everyone is aware of. It's also rank corruption, of course, but that's another topic. Last, when the EU inflicts these judgments, or the DOJ, take your pick, the costs are bundled right along in the cost of the goods and services these companies provide the consumers they are "looking out for." If you are someone who believes his government is his savior then you have my condolences. I think Apple is right here, because the whole scheme of consumer choice is that consumers pick and choose among the products companies offer. Microsoft Windows is more compatible with third party software and hardware than any desktop OS on Earth, which is my sole reason for choosing it. Just because the EUC forces companies do certain things it knows the companies do not want to do, "or else", has no bearing on consumer benefit. This Siri thing is almost idiotic it's so infantile. But this is what the EUC does when the EU in Brussels becomes cash-strapped and needs a big infusion of cash. Some people get upset by "big companies" but it's the opposite when governments dwarf the size and scope of these companies, which is so obvious it hurts.... I mean you can't honestly believe that forcing Apple to do things with Siri it has its own reasons to decline is something that "opens up" Apple, do you? Say it aint' so...
    • Looks like many years since the request was made, a directory tree view finally may be added. https://github.com/files-community/Files/pull/18537
    • There's this from last year https://gist.github.com/threat...364659a8887841aa43deca4efd9 but nothing about a buffer overflow that MS somehow can't code against. No matter what, it makes sense to take a "protected by default" approach.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      DragonOfMercy earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      bella52 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Techinmay earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      212
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!