• 0

CSS Differences between IE and Netscape


Question

First, if you have both IE and Netscape (or equivalent) installed on your machine, please look at this page in both browsers http://www.endlessss.com/test/ and you'll see that in IE, the right side looks fairly normal.

The same isn't true when viewed in Netscape (or equivalent).

I am asking any of you out there to look at the .css file (posted below and inside your temp files folder) and the html page to see what I need to change to make it look at least "better" in netscape.

I'm ok at this stuff, but not educated enough to know exactly what to change...

P.S. Ignore the calculator image, I know it's part of the Gant icon pack and I'll be changing it soon.

7 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

The latest Netscape, I just downloaded it from their website, I believe it's v.7.1

Should I be instead testing "other browers" with Mozilla, Firefox etc?

I was under the impression that Netscape used the same techniques to render a page as Mozilla, Firefox etc...

  • 0

I just downloaded firefox, and just like netscape, things look all jumbled up in it... I'm a bit confused.

It looks like I forgot to attach the files earlier, here they are. If anyone can take a look at my .css, please let me know if something is wrong...

Thanks!

  • 0

This one is an easy fix - kind of...

The problem is a combination of IE being broken with respect to certain things, and you're using IE as your only test bed while creating the CSS layout. I've had the same problem but going the other way: I design so the page looks good in everything available to me, then I go to check on IE and it's horribly mangled because of some stupid quirk. This particular issue is one I'm familar with:

It's like painting a picture to look clear while you're wearing somebody else's glasses: They'll look fine as long as what you see is being distorted, but anyone who can see clearly will have a blurry/distorted image.

solution

Delete the XML prolog from your HTML file and visit the site in IE. Notice how it looks exactly the same as firefox/safari. This is because IE 6 (and previous versions to IIRC) will drop into a "broken" non-standards compliant render model if it detects an XML prolog - thats a major pain in the butt. If you design the page to look right in IE using broken render mode, then it will look busted every else that is rendering the page correctly. I think she goes back to using the old broken box-model where width:750 makes the box 750 pixels no matter what, the standard says width:750 makes the box 750 + margins + padding + border.

Now that you have IE rendering things correctly, you can fix your CSS to make the page look the way you want it, and then try again in other browsers.

There's no real way to keep the XML prolog and have IE render correctly so the best choice is to just drop it: it's not a required item anyway.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I almost picked one up...Best Buy has a heck of a time getting them, much less keep them in stock.
    • Microsoft bans LibreOffice developer's account without warning, rejects appeal by David Uzondu Recently, we reported on LibreOffice, accusing Microsoft of intentionally using complex file formats as a tactic to lock in users to Microsoft Office, hindering open source alternatives like LibreOffice. Now, Microsoft has banned LibreOffice developer, Mike Kaganski, from using its services, citing an "activity that violates [its] Services Agreement". According to Mike, this happened last Monday when he tried to send a technical email to the LibreOffice dev mailing list, which is a normal part of his routine, but Thunderbird returned an error saying the message couldn't be sent. His account was blocked upon retry, and he found himself completely logged out of his Microsoft account. Kaganski guessed that his mail and account were getting flagged by a bot or something, since he was quite sure that nothing in the mail violated Microsoft's terms of service. So he decided to file an appeal, a process which later made him call Redmond "miserably incompetent in IT." The automated system asked for his phone number, which he provided, only to be greeted by a "Try another method" error message. The problem was that there was no other method offered. He then decided to reach out to Microsoft support directly. After some digging, he found a link to contact the team, and there it was, a button asking him to "Sign in to Contact support". Now, you might go, "Hold up, how is he supposed to sign in to contact support when his problem is that he can't sign in in the first place?" As Kaganski himself put it: He eventually got to use his wife's account to file an appeal and finally received a message from support. The instructions inside asked him to go to the sign-in page and, when told the account is blocked, provide a phone number (something he had already tried). Microsoft ignored his detailed report of the failing process, marked his ticket as resolved without any real action, and simply closed it. He is yet to recover his account. As for the email he was trying to send, he was later able to use Gmail, and it went through with no problem. If you are interested, you can read the full email for yourself and see if it violates Microsoft's services agreement. Mike's not the only person who's had their account locked recently, with seemingly no way to recover it. On the 17th of last month, Reddit user u/deus03690 shared how Microsoft locked their account, which, among other things, contained 30 years of "irreplaceable photos and work" on OneDrive. Their appeal, like Mike's, has been fruitless so far. The user said Microsoft reached out 10 days later, asking them to fill out a recovery form and promising to help them "every step of the way," but they haven't heard from the company since.
    • It's like Microsoft hasn't learned anything from Internet Explorer fiascos. Or they weren't slapped hard enough financially for it...
    • Yes they're payroll taxes with some of it linked to share-based compensation for employees. So when the stock price was rising in q2 these charges also increased.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Apprentice
      MikeK13 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      andeyhawk65 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Jake2530 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Explorer
      Deranox went up a rank
      Explorer
    • Week One Done
      John Volks earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      687
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      259
    3. 3
      Xenon
      178
    4. 4
      neufuse
      134
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      100
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!