Recommended Posts

I couldn't find anything on DHCP option 82 support in windows 2003.

I was wondering if:

a) anyone knows if its there or not

b) if there is a way to some how add it myself

c) get some type of plugin

I do not manage servers, just networks, and would like to have option 82 enabled on DHCP service so i can see the switch and port associated with the IP without searching all over. Since I don't know much about the DHCP service, or adding options, I was wondering if anyone knew anything or could point me in the right direction.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/159288-2003-dhcp-option-82/
Share on other sites

I'm not an expert, so excuse me if this is not true...

The 82 option must be enabled on a switch, not on a windows server. That option allows the switch to identify the hosts on its own ports, so the switch sends info about itself and the port assigned to the client.

I'm sure that you could find more info on cisco...

I hope this helps :)

Yeah its part of the switch configuration and it works with DHCP relay for Cisco and UDP helper for other switchs

Here is an Article that explain some of it. I had to look it up because i didn't know anything about it.

Correct me if i'm wrong and confirm it if i'm right but basically this feature enable you to create Virtual Vlan for each host connected to the switch???

Have fun!!!

I know this must be enabled on the switch, but the DHCP server needs to understand the option 82 part of the packet. I already know the switch needs to be configured, but when the DHCP packet comes to the DHCP server, it needs to be able to strip off, interpret, and add the option 82 info.

It's stated in the first paragraph of the link you posted: This feature enables the DHCP relay agent (Catalyst 3550 switch) to include information about itself and the attached client when forwarding DHCP requests from a DHCP client to a DHCP server.

Option 82 must be configured on switch AND the DHCP server. I'm looking to set it up on the server.

  • 1 year later...

Option 82 & Windows Servers -Grrrrrrrrr

Option 82 is used by DHCP relay agents to allow them to keep track of DHCP requests and deal with them more effectively.

WHAT SHOULD HAPPEN:

1)"DHCP Discover" packet broadcasted into network.

2)DHCP relay agent (Switch, DSLAM, Router, etc) sees the DHCP broadcast, and modifies it:

a) Adds its IP address in the <source address> field

b) Adds DHCP server address in the <destination address> field

c) Add option82 to the end of the packet containing details of where the broadcast came from (which interface, original source mac etc)

(at this stage the broadcast packet is now a unicast packet thus saving network resources)

3) Packet is then sent to server who should respond with a DHCP OFFER packet containing details of its service (IP address available, lease time etc) and OPTION 82 should e returned UNCHANGED. DHCP servers are not supposed to touch this option, just return it!

4) Relay agent recieves DHCP OFFER and can forward it as unicast packet straight to the PC that sent it based on the info in OPTION 82.

Without OPTION 82 then the packet would be broadcast on the same interface the DHCP relay agent recieved it on.

Hope that is clear....

And so far I have not found away of implementing this in windows. It just doesn't support it. It is possible to add new options - however I can't find a mechanism to tell the server to return option 82 untouched if it recieves it...

Good luck

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      565
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!