What Would You Like to See In the Beta Release Of iMessenger (Neowin Messenger)  

654 members have voted

  1. 1. What Would You Like to See In the Beta Release Of iMessenger (Neowin Messenger)

    • Skins
      59
    • Msn, Yahoo,Aim,Icq..Compatibility
      384
    • Fourm Area
      44
    • Inbuilt browser
      10
    • sounds
      9
    • Offline Posting
      42
    • Email Service
      6
    • Games
      19
    • Display Pictures (Like Msn)
      45
    • Emoicons
      36


Recommended Posts

My guess is that this thing will never see the light of day. I say this because the discussion of the topic by 912 is really just a mish-mash of unrelated terms and I'm not really seeing anything that indicates you actually know what you're doing. I'm also curious as to how message delivery is going to work without some form of server component running somewhere; there's been lots of discussion about the client but nothing about how message delivery will work (protocol? is it p2p? is it traditional client-server?)

My guess is that this thing will never see the light of day. I say this because the discussion of the topic by 912 is really just a mish-mash of unrelated terms and I'm not really seeing anything that indicates you actually know what you're doing. I'm also curious as to how message delivery is going to work without some form of server component running somewhere; there's been lots of discussion about the client but nothing about how message delivery will work (protocol? is it p2p? is it traditional client-server?)

On the third page there are some mock screenshots of the Messenger by LE3... so it has kind of seen the light of day :whistle:

unless it somehow ties together with the forum database directly, and, for instance, you could post from within the program, and see the latest discussions, follow your threads, etc., then i absolutely see no use of this program..

real-time chat? theres the Forum chat, which nobody other than Michael (lonely fella) seems to use..

anyway, if you were looking indeed to do a Neowin-specific chat server/program, wouldn't it be easier to do some sort of Jabber server thing? i'm not sure how this actually works, but i know people can use Jabber to create personal servers..

i doubt this will get any use, frankly.. in any case, you could try with something much simple (like with Jabber), see if it has acceptance, and then continuing your work on a messenger client..

I just looked at the mock-ups and it kind of looks exactly like MSN Messenger >_< so that's something I don't really like, you should try and make something completely new...

Other then that I agree with memNOC, you should tie it up with the Neowin DB and stuff... that'd be cool. What I'm trying to say is basically, don't make another MirandaIM or Trillian or such, make it really usefull and have stuff that only has use for neowin members and is innovative...

I like the idea of a neowin messenger though :p and I do hope that it works out great :D

unless it somehow ties together with the forum database directly, and, for instance, you could post from within the program, and see the latest discussions, follow your threads, etc., then i absolutely see no use of this program..

That Will be Compatible with the Messenger yes, If you dont want to use it thats fine by me. I am simply doing this project because i Pm alot of people... Hell Everybody Pm's but woulden't it be easier just to simply send them a instant messege...hrmmmm :huh:

we are making a new protocol... like msn's but more better.. this will take some time, and wont be released in some time. It will see the light of day just dont know how soon.

Which protocol? SIMPLE or the old MSNP protocol? Both are based on a traditional client-server model so I'm wondering where you plan on running the server (if you even planned on that since I've still seen no discussion of a server).

I've written Enterprise scale IM systems and based on my experience and your comments, I still say this thing will never see the light of day... screenshot mockups do not count for anything, only functional product counts.

That Will be Compatible with the Messenger yes, If you dont want to use it thats fine by me. I am simply doing this project because i Pm alot of people... Hell Everybody Pm's but woulden't it be easier just to simply send them a instant messege...hrmmmm :huh:

I think this would be faster than PMing and I will surely use it. Keep up going man! ;)

,May 12 2004, 14:50] it sounds interesting but i'd rather have a Miranda IM plugin. :)

I think [afc] is right. Since I've started using Miranda i can't change to another Messenger! :)

It might been easier too as you will have the core but you will only need to prepare the plugin! :o

Hmm.. or... the folk that you PM a lot... add them to your MSN list? :huh:

Yeah, but what about someone who you just want to contact once. For example he/she posted a desktop in the Desktop Thread and you want something of the desktop... If you PM him/her then you might get a reply 10 sec later or you might not get a reply at all. So this would be more convenient and faster as long as we all use it though!

Yeah, but what about someone who you just want to contact once. For example he/she posted a desktop in the Desktop Thread and you want something of the desktop... If you PM him/her then you might get a reply 10 sec later or you might not get a reply at all. So this would be more convenient and faster as long as we all use it though!

Well Said.. :yes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!