What Would You Like to See In the Beta Release Of iMessenger (Neowin Messenger)  

654 members have voted

  1. 1. What Would You Like to See In the Beta Release Of iMessenger (Neowin Messenger)

    • Skins
      59
    • Msn, Yahoo,Aim,Icq..Compatibility
      384
    • Fourm Area
      44
    • Inbuilt browser
      10
    • sounds
      9
    • Offline Posting
      42
    • Email Service
      6
    • Games
      19
    • Display Pictures (Like Msn)
      45
    • Emoicons
      36


Recommended Posts

Ok, to be honest I havnt looked through this thread until I started programming it. I was already working on a codebase of sorts anyway

To Jase: I hope you dont think im stepping on your toes - and i also hope you dont mind the neoin messenger name. As I said I really didnt realise you had started making yours

I read all the pages and I wanted to say good luck. It really sounds that this project is gonna take a while before it gets its first beta release :D

Also, I wanted to make a comment for the IM program that Jasse and the rest are building. What about NeoWIM :jump:

I am releasing a preview edition of (my version of) Neowin Messenger. This is not a fully working final product so please dont expect one. I would love some feedback on where to go on this, and if any other developers, artists, etc want to add anything feel free to say so.

What works in this very early alpha release?

Obviously nothing as much as a finished article, but enough that you can see the direction and start giving some comments back. These are some of the things that work

  • Basic GUI design
  • Sending messages over the LAN
  • Sending messages over the internet
  • Changing of nickname
  • Cool sign in animation

Here are some of the things that are intended for a later release

  • Contact list integration. This will not be the active user list
  • Neowin sign in a possability
  • Open Protocol and GPL code
  • Buddy pictures and/or neowin avatars
  • Minimise to system tray
  • Automatic updates

Where can I download this?

Download Neowin Messenger 0.1

You made need the VB runtime files. Please keep me updated if you have problems / need files to make this release work. Thanks all. -Dan

Edited by StaticFish

Okay guys.. I am starting on the core connection and contact list code now, and I have come accross a minor roadblock

Basically there are two ways we can go about this project, and the way we "log in". Each has their own advantages and disadvantages.

1. The Messenger program could log in with any name the user supplies, and isn't linked with a password related to neowin.net or any password at all. The advantage is that anyone could log in even if they are not a member - as you are probably thinking now this is also a major disadvantage. For instance one day I could log in as "StaticFish"and the next as "Blaise" or even "Neobond!" as nothing will be linked. Obviously this will probably be a bad idea but we will see

2. I am much more keen on the second way we could do it, but it will be a lot trickier and will involve more people, to work together. If we could somehow bind the program in with the main database, so that your personal neowin.net username and password works with Neowin Messenger. This opens up features that have been discussed early such as PM integration. There are of course limitations with the Invision Power Board, but the connections is the main point.

Some food for thought here. Coding will resume after feedback!

Cheers

Dan

U guy's are thinking way too far ahead.. if I were you i'd start off with a most simple way of messager, just so 2 persons can type to each other.. I had made such program about 2 years ago in delphi with my buddy. Though it was crappy it worked.. :pinch:

Stay with your feed on the ground, and don't start adding the most difficult features at the beginning.. this will most probably lead into a project failure.

Don't think about the UI first, start off with something simple and then slowly expand it with adding features step by step.

AthemeX.

Dont know if anybody would be interested with this, it's just a really simple network messaging program i wrote (well, not really, i based it of a toutorial i got in a magazine). Anyway, it uses old api's from 3.1, not tcp/ip so no internet version (although i have thought about re-writing it, but it's to much work), also, if you change your name to "MS Word", it enables a "boss" feature i coded in for a friend, the only way you can disable that is to close and re-open the program.

Edit:

1. yes, i do know it's crappy, but all my friends liked it :)

2. I heard MS changed the API's it uses in 2000 and beyond, when i tried it on a 2000 system (at school :devil: ) it didnt work, but i have tried it here (XP SP1) and it does, so your luck may vary :(

3. Also, the icon in the same icon as the on-screen keyboard, i changed the hue with IconWorkshop XP, if anybody wanted to know ;) (sorry ms)

Also, just to clarify, this program is sort of connection-less, open it and your connected, close and your dissconnected, typing any message and sending it will send it to any person with the program open, or you can change the "Send To" test from "Global Message" to a user name of somebody else using it to send the message just to them. Just change it back to talk to everybody again.

WinMessenger.rar

Edited by The_Decryptor
iMessenger? :sleep:

thats what I think about the name.

I don't really like the idea of you having access to the neowin database... :s

I think neobond needs to step up here and explian this to us.

iMessenger? It's nice and stuff.. but why follow Apple lead on using i in almost all of the products.

Neowin Messenger would be too long i must say... why not instead nMessenger or something else.. besides putting an i...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
    • Another devilish issue surrounding these certificates is what can happen with old, unsuspecting PCs that nevertheless have Secure Boot enabled. In my case, it was a Dell with a 3rd-gen Core chip (so about 13 years old). As of the last few weeks, it was suddenly BSOD'g within about 5 minutes of booting. Turns out it was because of MS's "Secure-Boot-Update" scheduled task, which is scheduled to run 5 minutes after login. It's explained in gory detail here (this is not my post, but it was where I found the answer), but the short version is that this legacy system would need fairly elaborate, manual certificate intervention since MS's automatic cert update method cannot work. How to do that is linked late in the thread. https://www.bleepingcomputer.c...od-caused-by-scheduled-task Secure Boot wasn't at all important for this particular PC, so I disabled it to be done with the problem.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      95
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!