What Would You Like to See In the Beta Release Of iMessenger (Neowin Messenger)  

654 members have voted

  1. 1. What Would You Like to See In the Beta Release Of iMessenger (Neowin Messenger)

    • Skins
      59
    • Msn, Yahoo,Aim,Icq..Compatibility
      384
    • Fourm Area
      44
    • Inbuilt browser
      10
    • sounds
      9
    • Offline Posting
      42
    • Email Service
      6
    • Games
      19
    • Display Pictures (Like Msn)
      45
    • Emoicons
      36


Recommended Posts

aww theres no chat... :( but at least it logs on now

:edit: no i havent seen any funny changes

:edit2:

i changed default to EnIgMa-PenGuIn in the setting.. it remembers.. but now wont connect

how odd

::edit 3:: and the connect to yourself stil works .. hahah thats cool

you could soo try and make this think de centralised ;)

(dunno if changing that address does anything tho)

Edited by EnIgMa-PenGuIn
aww theres no chat... :( but at least it logs on now

:edit: no i havent seen any funny changes

:edit2:

i changed default to EnIgMa-PenGuIn in the setting.. it remembers.. but now wont connect

how odd

It will connect but you have to try again in a few minutes

im not sure why this bug exists. im working on it

another bug.. we can rename ourselves and other people and the groups... lol :whistle:

plus the log onto yourself bug

:edit: sorry michael :p

and the list doesnt seem to be updating without logging off or takes a very long time to make people appear

post-88-1088940582.jpg

Edited by EnIgMa-PenGuIn

---------------------------

Project1

---------------------------

Component 'MSINET.OCX' or one of its dependencies not correctly registered: a file is missing or invalid

---------------------------

OK

---------------------------

XP SP2 RC2 and i installed the VB6 updates.

I know noone probably reads this section, but I really need some guidance with this - so I will post it again.

-----

Basically there are two ways we can go about this project, and the way we "log in". Each has their own advantages and disadvantages.

1. The Messenger program could log in with any name the user supplies, and isn't linked with a password related to neowin.net or any password at all. The advantage is that anyone could log in even if they are not a member - as you are probably thinking now this is also a major disadvantage. For instance one day I could log in as "StaticFish"and the next as "Blaise" or even "Neobond!" as nothing will be linked. Obviously this will probably be a bad idea but we will see

2. I am much more keen on the second way we could do it, but it will be a lot trickier and will involve more people, to work together. If we could somehow bind the program in with the main database, so that your personal neowin.net username and password works with Neowin Messenger. This opens up features that have been discussed early such as PM integration. There are of course limitations with the Invision Power Board, but the connections is the main point.

This is now almost a fully functional login box. To make it 100% working, the above stuff needs to be worked out

I was thinking about this problem. I was thinking about a possible work around... Let me know what you think.

What if we sent the person who wanted to sign up a PM on Neowin with a passcode, to verify that they are registering a Neowin account that belongs to them? This would also keep people off who don't have a Neowin account. Assuming you can't link to the Neowin database....

---------------------------

Project1

---------------------------

Component 'MSINET.OCX' or one of its dependencies not correctly registered: a file is missing or invalid

---------------------------

OK

---------------------------

XP SP2 RC2 and i installed the VB6 updates.

Same problem after installing VB6... it's got to be to do with the new security features of SP2.

theyarecomingforyou, here put it in your system 32 folder and register it

as for logging in as diferent people theres no server side database of users yet.. hence you cant log in that way

thats why he was asking for the admins help... and then the idea of confirmation pms came up..

lets see how it goes

there are a few other dll's it asks for... check bad a few pages for the other fixes

presently there are some errors with the buddy list .. so im sure they'll be fixed but a user database sever side helps too

MSInet.cab

OK im working on all the bugs...

i fixed the rename bug... im in the priocess of fixing the name merging bug

hopefully 0.1.5 will be out tonight. thanks for the feedback guys

I was thinking about this problem. I was thinking about a possible work around... Let me know what you think.

What if we sent the person who wanted to sign up a PM on Neowin with a passcode, to verify that they are registering a Neowin account that belongs to them? This would also keep people off who don't have a Neowin account. Assuming you can't link to the Neowin database....

Even better, it will automaticly detect your neowin username etc and you will be able to log in with that. Hopefully this will be done by build 0.1.6 or 0.1.7

OK im working on all the bugs...

i fixed the rename bug... im in the priocess of fixing the name merging bug

hopefully 0.1.5 will be out tonight. thanks for the feedback guys

No sweat dude.. looking forward to bug testing some more for ya ;)

im off to bed..... tis late *yawn* night

It seems I need to work on my reading skills more. However, what I was thinking is something like this:

Signin

NWM --> PHP script --> check login with neowin --> return login --> PHP script --> NWM auth'ed

Then for PMs it would be similar replacing login with PM.

Then for messenging people it could be something like this:

NWM --> PHP script --> add new message to messages DB (SQLite i'm thinking here for speed) -- > other user checks messages [or alternitvley the PHP script cold push a new message to the client. this would require tracknig of IP though] --> recieves message.

The only trouble is this would be very, very slow most likley. Assuming a latency to the server of 100ms, a message transmit time of 100ms and a query time of 100ms, that's 300ms to add the message. Then you'd have to check messages every 1 second or so which would be incredibly stressful on the server. On second thoughts, pushing the message to the client is the only way. Maybe the other method would be for offlnie storage and checked only on login time?

avoid doing the pm issue

why not do a "if true" part.. say when they log on.. it logs onto neowin with that user and pass and if.. if.. that is correct the "now logging you on" thing should show up.. just use that as the if part, then logon etc

id be worried about passwords being stored locally tho....(on the server that is)

Yes, that's exactly what I was planning to do. The PM part wouldn't be hard to do after that, assuming we have someone with l33t text parsing knowledge on here. (send HTTP request to the view PM page with a cookie of the username and password, and retrive the messages.

Anyone thought of making this opensource aswell :)?

I also think that storing the username and passwords would be a worry but as long as we got someone to run the server who was trustful, then we'd have no problems, I hope.

Maybe NeoWin could open a small API up for us so we can send md5 passwords to the server instead?

theyarecomingforyou, here put it in your system 32 folder and register it

as for logging in as diferent people theres no server side database of users yet.. hence you cant log in that way

thats why he was asking for the admins help... and then the idea of confirmation pms came up..

lets see how it goes

there are a few other dll's it asks for... check bad a few pages for the other fixes

presently there are some errors with the buddy list .. so im sure they'll be fixed but a user database sever side helps too

Erm... well, that got rid of the first error, now I get an "mscomctl.ocx" error upon startup. I've restarted the computer to see if that helped, but to no avail. A quick internet search shows that all the files producing problems are based around ActiveX so is it just that Microsoft has clamped down all files (I originally got a message asking if I was sure I wanted to run it, and that the Publisher information was not present).

Any help would be appreciated.

OK... solved.

I searched for "mscomctl.ocx", installed it from here: "http://www.geocities.com/nitin_speed/resources.htm".

Then I need "mswinsck.ocx", installed it from here: "http://www.runan.net/program/runtime/dl.cgi?file=mswinsck"

So, the program launched. But, when I type my username in it tells me to stop being silly and pick a shorter name. :huh:

I know it's beta, so I guess it will get fixed later. Sounds a cool idea for a program though.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
    • Another devilish issue surrounding these certificates is what can happen with old, unsuspecting PCs that nevertheless have Secure Boot enabled. In my case, it was a Dell with a 3rd-gen Core chip (so about 13 years old). As of the last few weeks, it was suddenly BSOD'g within about 5 minutes of booting. Turns out it was because of MS's "Secure-Boot-Update" scheduled task, which is scheduled to run 5 minutes after login. It's explained in gory detail here (this is not my post, but it was where I found the answer), but the short version is that this legacy system would need fairly elaborate, manual certificate intervention since MS's automatic cert update method cannot work. How to do that is linked late in the thread. https://www.bleepingcomputer.c...od-caused-by-scheduled-task Secure Boot wasn't at all important for this particular PC, so I disabled it to be done with the problem.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      95
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!