What Would You Like to See In the Beta Release Of iMessenger (Neowin Messenger)  

654 members have voted

  1. 1. What Would You Like to See In the Beta Release Of iMessenger (Neowin Messenger)

    • Skins
      59
    • Msn, Yahoo,Aim,Icq..Compatibility
      384
    • Fourm Area
      44
    • Inbuilt browser
      10
    • sounds
      9
    • Offline Posting
      42
    • Email Service
      6
    • Games
      19
    • Display Pictures (Like Msn)
      45
    • Emoicons
      36


Recommended Posts

StaticFish can you please declare the status of this project?

-EnIgMa-PenGuIn

First of all, appologies for taking so long to post back here.

Secondly, I hope the project isn't dead, and i'm positive it isnt. I'm just getting ready to start a new life. I'm leaving home for University in London, at the end of September for the next three years, and I have been getting ready for it in the last few weeks. As you can imagine its a pretty big step for an 18 year old. Especially a lazy one like me ;)

At the start of October I will be fully in University life, and have a decent internet connection too. This means I will be able to get right back on the project, and hopefully we can make it the minor success it has been up to now. I have had a great time working on it, and hearing feedback from you guys - and its not going to just be terminated!

Sorry this has taken so long, and thanks for the understanding.

Watch this space!

Dan

First of all, appologies for taking so long to post back here.

Secondly, I hope the project isn't dead, and i'm positive it isnt. I'm just getting ready to start a new life. I'm leaving home for University in London, at the end of September for the next three years, and I have been getting ready for it in the last few weeks. As you can imagine its a pretty big step for an 18 year old. Especially a lazy one like me ;)

At the start of October I will be fully in University life, and have a decent internet connection too. This means I will be able to get right back on the project, and hopefully we can make it the minor success it has been up to now. I have had a great time working on it, and hearing feedback from you guys - and its not going to just be terminated!

Sorry this has taken so long, and thanks for the understanding.

Watch this space!

Dan

ahhh yes i know the transition well.... uni, gotta love it

take your time dude ^_^ and nice to see ya :p

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
thanks guys means a lot to me :)

NeowinMessenger has a future! Be sure of that. I was hoping to get it integrated into Aerobrowser sometime.. just seen the news :(

Just reading back a few posts.. and Yeah.. aerobrowers integration will diffinitely work now.

Wow I've read all 31 pages and I have to say...congrats staticfish, even if the project never does get finished due to workloads from uni you made it much farther than Jase. I really like the simplistic layout of the neowin messenger, unfortunatly I have not been able to connect but will try at another time....either way good job mate and congrats again on getting farther than Jase had :)

Wow I've read all 31 pages and I have to say...congrats staticfish, even if the project never does get finished due to workloads from uni you made it much farther than Jase. I really like the simplistic layout of the neowin messenger, unfortunatly I have not been able to connect but will try at another time....either way good job mate and congrats again on getting farther than Jase had :)

I don't feel like reading all 31 pages, but did Jase even do anything?

We can't really know for sure...by the looks of it no :no:

Jase

Vs.

Static Fish

Jase - talked about the project...and by the seems of it did nothing but TALK

Static Fish - talked about it and made the project come alive, and above all didn't give it a stupid name like iMessanger

Jase - Showed a screenshot of it...a screenshot, that actually someone else had worked on...not him

Static Fish - No screenshot but who needs one ? he's pumped out quite a few alpha's now, again Static wins

Jase - Again with the name...iMessanger, thats one of the most blasphemous names I'd give to a messanger that is not associated with apple...ever

Static Fish - Named it so that people would definatly recognize where it came from and what its for

This is all the evidence I need to say that StaticFish pwns Jase

Guys...

Thank you all for the kind words and support through the project. I am now fairly settled in university, but there are a few roadblocks that would prohibit me developing much further (or at least at a considerable rate)

One of these things is the internet connection. Although its a fast internet DSL connection, many ports have been blocked on the university connected both internally and externally. This wouldnt normally be a problem, but as you may know, getting good packets down the highly unreliable port 80 is a nightmare. It can be done, but it would be a major step back.

Another problem (in some ways connected to the first) is that I only have access to one machine in my room now, as I left my laptop at home to save space. It is difficult to create an application like this using two machines networked; and it would be impossable to use one. Some of you may remember me private messeging you over MSN to try and get me to test something at one time. This is because I was using two machines, and I needed a third to see a certain affect, or fix a bug.

The last reason it would be hard for me to continue with the project, is the amount of work and lectures I have to attend and submit. Although I love Neowin (and this is certainly one of the best communities I have ever been part of) I cannot afford for it to take over my studies.

I would like to say a big thank you to the people who have helped me test certain features and support me through the project. These include EnIgMa-PenGuIn, and matt74441 for the great support, RSi for the bandwidth and hosting he gave to the neowin messenger server, and all of the others I have forgotten to mention. Thanks!

--

Finally, of course I would not like the project to completly die. Quite the contrary - I would love to be able to log into Neowin Messenger soon! So heres the deal. I'll give you the Neowin Messenger and Neowin Messenger Server VB6 source code. It's everything i wrote for the project. In return you must not complain about the bad structure, misspellings of variables, shabby code, and lack of comments! :p

http://www.staticfish.co.uk/NeowinMessengerSource.zip

Take care,

StaticFish (Dan)

Well, I will say this, You tried your best and thats all we can ask of anyone (Y).

I enjoyed testing out this software and although im sad to see it falter, its nice to see

the open source philosophy come into play.

Thanks for your all your efforts Staticfish :happy:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!