I'm converted! (windowblinds)


Recommended Posts

I just tried WB and DAMN! It is amazing! :woot: I was always just using visual styles with the modded UXTheme thinking windowblinds was just an unneeded pay program, but I decided to give it a try. I am VERY impressed. So many features and the visual results are great, so I bought it. Just commenting. Enjoy! :yes:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/162235-im-converted-windowblinds/
Share on other sites

personally i hate everything stardock.. i dont like the idea of crap running in the backround.. and to me their visual styles look like crap half the time.. IMO

ok, everyone is entitled to their own opinons and all .. but if you use msstyles .. you have **** running in the background using a lot more mem than WB... it's called svchost.exe, you should check it out sometimes ..

also Windows Blinds is supposed to take less CPU as it does not constantly redraw the skins. You really must try making some WB skins with "always on top" and such buttons, then you'll get much more featured titlebars, without Windows Blinds you would have to run seperate program to show always on top and such...

personally i hate everything stardock.. i dont like the idea of crap running in the backround.. and to me their visual styles look like crap half the time.. IMO

Of course that is your opinion and you are entitled to it....but that wasn't the point of this thread.

I have been a loyal WB user since the early 3.x days and just love. To me it is the single best program I have invested in.

If you love WB now...just wait for ver 4.3 to be released. It is got some great new features being added to it.

If you are looking for a great WB theme that isn't busy and looks professional...I suggest trying the watercolor theme by Binary or if you are a OS X fan then try the OS X theme by Xero.

There are loads of great looking WB themes if you look for them... a good place to start is wincustomize: Link

And to Xer34.....just remember that there is A LOT of crappy looking visual styles out there also. So don't just bash WB based upon what some authors create. Plus your reason about the wbload.exe being an extra resource in the background is incorrect. Wbload is used instead of the theme service running. So if you use the theme service (which is combination of the uxtheme.dll and svchost.exe) then you are using around 5-6 MB of resources. When you disable the theme service and use wbload.exe you use about 2 MB of resources.

usually it's called "stylexpservice" not svchost. Correct me if I'm wrong but Scvhost is a windows XP process.

That process is pnly running if you use the stylexp program. Which if you do use it is running on top of the theme service. So you are actually running two theme services and using extra resources.

ok, everyone is entitled to their own opinons and all .. but if you use msstyles .. you have **** running in the background using a lot more mem than WB... it's called svchost.exe, you should check it out sometimes ..

I just switched to WB 4.2 (from styleXP 2.x), I didn't un-install styleXP, before installing WB I switched the style back to windows classic, then disabled the themes service, and did an install.

WB seems to be slightly faster but i wanted to make sure i have it optimized. I still have 4 svchost.exe's running... should i be concerned?

thanks,

post-62-1083265146.jpg

I just switched to WB 4.2 (from styleXP 2.x), I didn't un-install styleXP, before installing WB I switched the style back to windows classic, then disabled the themes service, and did an install.

WB seems to be slightly faster but i wanted to make sure i have it optimized. I still have 4 svchost.exe's running... should i be concerned?

thanks,

svchost.exe is a general win32 process that XP uses to control a lot of services.

I actually have 5 of them running on my machine....nothing to be too concerned with.

Although, you should go through your active services and disable the ones you know you won't use. You can free up resources.

Please do not get confused like kona does! If you use the TaskManager included with Windows, it does not give you accurate informations about your running processess. You must download for example CurrProcess if you want to see what is really running on your system. Kona when you use styleXP it adds the stylexpservice on top of the other processess that does all the skinning

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • But building your own.. what? You can't build anything like the Steam Machine yourself. Even trying to get close costs a good deal more. Even just the CPU cooler in their price comparison is as big as the entire Steam Machine. If you want a regular gaming PC, then by all means, build that. If you want a a small console-like PC for the living room that is good for gaming, I'm not sure what else is a better deal. In the GN review, they only mentioned a small form factor Dell, which is like twice the size and hundreds of dollars more expensive.
    • Those are some popular multiplayer games. But hardly "all". Just those that don't work on Linux currently due to specific anti-cheat implementations. I think it's also fair to point out the literally thousands of games that don't work on the PS5. And it's not locked at 1080p. That's the default, which you can change.
    • Ubuntu Livepatch arrives on Arm64 to eliminate system reboots for kernel updates by Paul Hill Canonical has just announced that its Livepatch service now supports computers with Arm64 processors. For those who are not familiar, Livepatch allows users to apply important kernel updates without any service interruption or rebooting. While home users will benefit from this, it’s even more important for critical machines that absolutely should not be going offline at all. The feature is available as part of Ubuntu Core 26 for Arm64 and Ubuntu Core 20 and onwards for AMD64. According to Canonical, this will improve the security of systems that aren’t security-maintained daily or weekly, and it helps organizations work towards Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) compliance. If you are familiar with Ubuntu, you probably know that most packages can be updated without having to restart the system. There is one big exception to this, and that’s the kernel; it typically requires you to reload the system to boot into the new kernel. With Livepatch, Canonical has done something so that you don’t need to restart to begin using the new kernel. Aside from Ubuntu Core 26, users with Arm64 chips running Ubuntu 26.04 LTS can also use Livepatch. If you want to learn more about Livepatch, check out its product page. There, you can also find a button to join Ubuntu Pro (it’s free for several home devices) so that you can enable Livepatch. By linking your computer to Ubuntu Pro, you will also extend the life of your Ubuntu install from five years to ten years. If you are running Ubuntu, let us know in the comments if you have been looking forward to this feature on your ARM-based computer. If you’ve had a compatible AMD64 machine for a while and never used this feature, let us know why in the comments!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      500
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      206
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!