I'm converted! (windowblinds)


Recommended Posts

WindowBlinds users are much MUCH more tolerant than MSStyle "advocates".

By the line "alot of people are very defensive about the theming software they use" i meant people who use wb or msstyles and like to argue over it, like i said in my first post, i didnt post to start arguments. that was only my opinion, and i never put down or argued with anybody who disagreed, it's just not my nature, i really dont give a crap what theming software anybody uses and wont argue for one over the other, like i said before, if you use wb fine, i dont care, if you use msstyles then fine, i still dont care, it has no effect on me at all.

So could people stop bringing me into stuff about this cause i dont care and have better things to do with my time than reply to people who disagree with my opinions. And yes i know i brought myself into this and for that im kicking myself

Also, AthleticTrainer1981 where did you get that mac skin, i have been looking for it can cant find it (Also to everybody else, see how im looking for a WB skin, so no more crap about me being a msstyles fanboy, ok?)

Also, AthleticTrainer1981 where did you get that mac skin, i have been looking for it can cant find it (Also to everybody else, see how im looking for a WB skin, so no more crap about me being a msstyles fanboy, ok?)

that is the OS X Panther theme by Xero that can be found over at wincustomize

Link: OS X panther at wincustomize

ahh i hate WB makes we want to vom and the fact that it works on 9x pcs makes it worse.

EDIT OK AthleticTrainer1981

1. I hate it because I don?t think windows 9x should be themed the way xp can be done why? Because its not meant to be.

2. people say its safer to use than mssthemes. I don?t think it is when i use it it always crashes.

3. most of the themes are awful looking,

4. Why pay for it when given some time you could get the same effect manually using reshacker,

5. its not user friendly and Im an advanced user.

Happy?

Edited by Banzai
ahh i hate WB makes we want to vom and the fact that it works on 9x pcs makes it worse.

EDIT OK AthleticTrainer1981

1. I hate it because I don?t think windows 9x should be themed the way xp can be done why? Because its not meant to be.

2. people say its safer to use than mssthemes. I don?t think it is when i use it it always crashes.

3. most of the themes are awful looking,

4. Why pay for it when given some time you could get the same effect manually using reshacker,

5. its not user friendly and Im an advanced user.

Happy?

no i am not happy at all. here's why to answer your questio1. I hate it because I don?t think windows 9x should be themed the way xp can be done why? Because its not meant to be.e.

that's the whole point of the program. to also make other people skin their computer, its main purpose is still2. people say its safer to use than mssthemes. I don?t think it is when i use it it always crashes.hes.

my computer is on 24/7 and i have been running windowblinds for 2 months now, it hasn't crashed once. be careful with what you say. :rol3. most of the themes are awful lookingking

each to their opinion. you may think they are awful but other may like them. have you ever seen opulence, vector-cell, mini OS, Kwek Hoe, etc...? If you haven't http://www.guiolympics.com is the place t4. Why pay for it when given some time you could get the same effect manually using reshacker,ker,

you pay for it to show the authors that you respect their software and that you sponser them to continue doing this. why pay for xp while you could still be usi5. its not user friendly and Im an advanced user. er.

oh come on now. not user friendly? its all self explained, you dont even have to search for anything anymore. i remember it last year, then it was hard. damn it advanced yo:rolleyes:olleyes:

Banzai, you're in a wb forum here and most of what you said is just rubbish. if you don't like it don't use but dont start critising other themes and the software itself with untrue:no:ts. :no:

5. its not user friendly and Im an advanced user.

Ummm... wait a second... if you're an advanced user, what do you need user-friendliness for?

Pretty little interfaces are for n00bs who can't figure out "advanced interfaces" aren't they? (Frankly using a uxtheme hack requires figuring out what version of Windows you're running, which is beyond your average user's abilities... Windowblinds requires approximately four clicks to skin your computer - 1 to install, 1 to open up the display properties, 1 to select the skin you want, and 1 to apply it.)

Ummm... wait a second... if you're an advanced user, what do you need user-friendliness for?

Pretty little interfaces are for n00bs who can't figure out "advanced interfaces" aren't they? (Frankly using a uxtheme hack requires figuring out what version of Windows you're running, which is beyond your average user's abilities... Windowblinds requires approximately four clicks to skin your computer - 1 to install, 1 to open up the display properties, 1 to select the skin you want, and 1 to apply it.)

Even the Advanced WB Config is very easy to use (how I apply all my skins).

Now, I hear that WB 4.3 + SkinStudio will allow me to port MSStyles to WB!  Now this would be soo cool!  I totally prefer MSStyle themes like Aluminum  Alloy, Milk, etc.  than most WB themes.  GUI Olympics has some good fresh new WB themes though.

To enjoy GUI on the next level buy WB 4.3 then download the themes from the GUI Olympics

------------

Greenskid -

Aluminum Alloy, Milk, Smoothstripes, Panther and just about every OS X theme out there have been made as Windowblinds skin. They aren't msstyles themes at all!

In addition, the Windowblinds versions HAVe the widgets in the upper left corner where they're supposed to, and WITH correct hover (all three buttons should show the x - + when any of them are hovered over). Msstyles can't do this. Windowblinds versions of the skins are also available in 0px and 1px borders (more accurate to the original OS X theme).

Go and check out the Stardock > Windowblinds section on www.aqua-soft.org for all your Windows --> OS X theming desires.

ahh i hate WB makes we want to vom and the fact that it works on 9x pcs makes it worse.

EDIT OK AthleticTrainer1981

1. I hate it because I don?t think windows 9x should be themed the way xp can be done why? Because its not meant to be.

2. people say its safer to use than mssthemes. I don?t think it is when i use it it always crashes.

3. most of the themes are awful looking,

4. Why pay for it when given some time you could get the same effect manually using reshacker,

5. its not user friendly and Im an advanced user.

Happy?

1. No one ever said you had to have Win 9x skinned, it's all up to what you want.

2. And look through neowin at all the horror stories people have had with getting the modified uxtheme to work, plenty of problems there. When was the last time you heard of WB not installing correctly. It is the poorly coded theme that can crash programs, same thing with msstyles.

3. Have you looked through guiolympics lately? Try flipping through wincustomize. Some very good themes there. I can name plenty of aweful looking msstyles also.

4. By using your opinion, why drive when given enough time you can walk there. People use WB and msstyles because they have lives and don't have the time to manually reshack every file to make a skin.

5. WB is very user friendly. You apply themes using display properites, just like applying an msstyles.

Your arguments are pointless that aren't backed up with any facts. I can come back with you with just as many reason why I don't use msstyles, but what's the point? I use WB because it worlds for me and I like it and I don't like msstyles.

-- Autumnmist

Thanks for that info about the OSX windowblinds themes. :)

--

Oh, does anyone know if WindowFX can add a shadow the Taskbar when its positioned at the top of the screen?

I am currenlty using yzShadow and also yzToolbar. WB 3.4 means I can throw away yzToolbar, however if WindowFX can replace yzShadow (for taskbar) then I'll just go and update my ObjectDesktop from Stardock.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • But building your own.. what? You can't build anything like the Steam Machine yourself. Even trying to get close costs a good deal more. Even just the CPU cooler in their price comparison is as big as the entire Steam Machine. If you want a regular gaming PC, then by all means, build that. If you want a a small console-like PC for the living room that is good for gaming, I'm not sure what else is a better deal. In the GN review, they only mentioned a small form factor Dell, which is like twice the size and hundreds of dollars more expensive.
    • Those are some popular multiplayer games. But hardly "all". Just those that don't work on Linux currently due to specific anti-cheat implementations. I think it's also fair to point out the literally thousands of games that don't work on the PS5. And it's not locked at 1080p. That's the default, which you can change.
    • Ubuntu Livepatch arrives on Arm64 to eliminate system reboots for kernel updates by Paul Hill Canonical has just announced that its Livepatch service now supports computers with Arm64 processors. For those who are not familiar, Livepatch allows users to apply important kernel updates without any service interruption or rebooting. While home users will benefit from this, it’s even more important for critical machines that absolutely should not be going offline at all. The feature is available as part of Ubuntu Core 26 for Arm64 and Ubuntu Core 20 and onwards for AMD64. According to Canonical, this will improve the security of systems that aren’t security-maintained daily or weekly, and it helps organizations work towards Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) compliance. If you are familiar with Ubuntu, you probably know that most packages can be updated without having to restart the system. There is one big exception to this, and that’s the kernel; it typically requires you to reload the system to boot into the new kernel. With Livepatch, Canonical has done something so that you don’t need to restart to begin using the new kernel. Aside from Ubuntu Core 26, users with Arm64 chips running Ubuntu 26.04 LTS can also use Livepatch. If you want to learn more about Livepatch, check out its product page. There, you can also find a button to join Ubuntu Pro (it’s free for several home devices) so that you can enable Livepatch. By linking your computer to Ubuntu Pro, you will also extend the life of your Ubuntu install from five years to ten years. If you are running Ubuntu, let us know in the comments if you have been looking forward to this feature on your ARM-based computer. If you’ve had a compatible AMD64 machine for a while and never used this feature, let us know why in the comments!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      206
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!