-
Posts
-
By darkpuma · Posted
Because Win7 was beautiful, much faster and more functional. Win10 (glossing over 8 as many do) was slightly faster in some cases, more functional in some cases, but some people such as myself hated how it looked and decided it wasn't worth the upgrade. Some people liked (or were ok with) the look, and thus it is a good upgrade. Win11 is like 10, but is less functional. It literally has nothing going for it, and I use it every day at work so I'm quite familiar with it. -
By darkpuma · Posted
I switched my mom from Chrome to Firefox and she had a serious meltdown. She even managed to figure out how to reinstall Chrome, which really surprised me. What finally got her to switch was Chrome no longer being supported on Win7 and me putting a Chrome skin on FF, and setting it up identically. -
By sagum · Posted
Feels very much like most other gnome based Linux distros. There is minimal amounts that are influenced by Windows 11, maybe just enough to make people who are switching comfortable enough with the idea. As far as I can tell its mainly just turning the 'taskbar' panel as a 100% sized static panel, rather than the default dynamic sized. Turning it from the Mac OS Dock into the Windows taskbar. The Arc Menu - that I assume you're taking not with from the screenshots, is indeed the Windows 11 style one, but it has lots of other options too, from the more traditional gnome, Windows 7 etc. Still free to install what ever Window Manager you want once you're comfortable enough with Linux though. -
By darkpuma · Posted
Wow, and here I'm still happily using 1080p... -
By Gerowen · Posted
Added an extra filter to Fail2Ban. I thought about just adding this to my existing aibots filter, but for the time being I'm keeping it separate because it's "possible" real humans may trigger this one so as long as it doesn't start filling my inbox I'd like to get notified about these so I can adjust it as necessary in the future. I'm still holding close to 10k unique IP addresses at any given time that have been banned via the "aibots" filter that looks for certain user agent strings of known AI scrapers. However, I've been getting an increasing amount of traffic trying to scrape the site with sanitized user agent strings that just look like normal web browsers, however... Because I enabled authentication I can now see that they're racking up lots of 401 (unauthorized) responses in the Apache "access.log" file, but they're not triggering anything in the Apache "error.log" file, which is where failed attempts to log in would appear. Basically, if an actual human tried to log in with an invalid username and password they don't immediately go into "access.log" as a 401, they go into "error.log" with a status message such as "user FOO not found". The only way to trigger a 401 simply by visiting the site, as far as I'm aware, is to hit "Cancel" on the login prompt, or otherwise try to access files directly without properly authenticating. So, given the fact I'm getting a few thousand 401 errors a day from sanitized user agent strings that don't show up in "error.log", which means no attempt at logging in properly, I added another jail/filter set to Fail2Ban to immediately ban anybody who triggers a 401. This feels a bit nuclear so I may need to adjust it in the future, but as far as I'm aware so far no real humans are being inconvenienced so all I'm doing is wasting the time of some AI scraper bots. Example log entry 61.170.149.70 - - [25/Jun/2025:20:01:04 -0400] "GET /content/mdwiki_en_all_maxi_2024-06/A/Neuroregeneration HTTP/1.1" 401 3287 "https://kiwix.marcusadams.me/content/mdwiki_en_all_maxi_2024-06/A/Neuroregeneration" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/114.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/114.0.1823.43" Contents of /etc/fail2ban/filter.d/apache-401repeat.conf #Fail2Ban filter for bots and scrapers that try to access #files directly without entering credentials for apache2-auth #and therefore trigger lots of 401 errors without triggering #the apache-auth jail. # #Marcus Dean Adams [Definition] failregex = ^<HOST> .+\" 401 \d+ .*$ Contents of /etc/fail2ban/jail.d/apache-401repeat.local [apache-401repeat] enabled = true ignoreip = 10.1.1.1 port = 80,443 filter = apache-401repeat maxretry = 1 bantime = 672h findtime = 10m logpath = /var/log/apache2/access.log Oh, and all this traffic is AFTER I explicitly banned Alibaba's IP ranges that were absolutely blowing me up day and night. Observation; two of the IP addresses that have triggered this jail in the 30 or so minutes since I turned it on were owned by Microsoft. Wonder if they're doing their own AI scraping/probing, or if that's just an Azure VM owned by somebody else.
-
-
Recent Achievements
-
Phillip0web went up a rank
Rising Star
-
Epaminombas earned a badge
One Month Later
-
Bert Fershner earned a badge
One Year In
-
ChrisOdinUK earned a badge
Reacting Well
-
Steviant earned a badge
One Year In
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Tell a friend
Question
SnowBlizzard
I got Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003 Enterprise Architect Version CD for my academic use. However, if I install Enterprise Architect Version, it require .NET Framework 1.1, Java SDK, and other components to be installed before VS .NET Enterprise Architect can be installed... These components consumed alot of space and resource on my computer...I don't want these components... I prefer Professional Version...So is it possible to modify the version from "Enterprise Architect" to "Professional"? Then I can have "Professional Version" so that I don't need to install these unnecessary components... Anyone who know how to modify the version i.e changing the setup files or system files to install as "Professional Version"?
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/165417-visual-studio-net-2003/Share on other sites
15 answers to this question
Recommended Posts